One Social Network PR Strategy That’s Right on Target

Remember the scene in Network where the news anchor Howard Beale (played deliciously by Peter French) shouts his famous line, “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!”? This past summer thousands of Target shoppers expressed that same sentiment online when they found out their favorite general store had donated piles of cash ($150,000) to an organization that supports Minnesota gubernatorial candidate Tom Emmer, whose tax policies Target said it liked, but who also holds anti-gay views and a few other controversial opinions, according to the Star Tribune:

“Emmer opposes gay marriage and abortion, supports Arizona’s immigration law, and previously has proposed chemically castrating sex offenders and steering state money away from AIDS prevention programs.” Insert your political reaction thought balloon here….

Of course big companies make donations all the time to politicians both sides of the aisle to cover their ah, clout with law makers. But the reaction to Target’s influence-peddling gift met an almost immediate Social Network avalanche and a tsunami of trad media as well. Some 58,000 Facebook friends joined together and called for a national boycott, plus the story generated more negative news coverage in August than five years worth of PR expenses paid to big flak companies to try and prevent that from ever happening. Once this Emmer thing went viral, it was all over for the Bullseye except for the back peddling.

On the other hand, the Jet Blue story about their employee slipping out on the job down the emergency chute was more contained by the low-cost airline, due to some extent by the way true Blue handled the story online, if you believe this analysis from Social Times below (and I do because in the age of sensational news reporting and crowd sourcing where almost anything can become “newsworthy” if enough people are paying attention to it, you need to take the air out of some stories quickly):

“The majority of media analysts felt JetBlue was sitting on a ticking PR time bomb by keeping silent. Finally, two days later, JetBlue posted 140 words on their blog with a mixture of tongue-in-cheek, self-depreciation and a reference to the cult movie Office Space.

How did JetBlue fare in the court of everyone’s opinion on the social web? Sit back and learn, because JetBlue nailed it. Its response was notable for four things:

  1. Acknowledging the weirdness of the situation rather than its seriousness may have kept the social media conversation away from topics that could have turned critical of JetBlue.
  2. Using a tone consistent with the JetBlue brand reinforced the brand as sufficiently resilient to weather this storm.
  3. Refraining from firing off a quick defense before they knew against what they were defending may have prevented the airline of having to defend itself at all.
  4. Responding only in their blog almost guaranteed wide distribution across social media.”

On the other hand – even though we have used both hands already and do not really have a third hand – can you really compare the two situations, an errant employee and an errant political donation? You decide and send me the verdict.

Yes, my friends, as that Arizona politician John McCain often says (although you wonder if he’s really their friends, like on Facebook,) that is the kind of PR strategy – or some shape of it — that every company large and small needs to have available for handling issues in a social media world. You can read the whole Social Times post here:

http://www.socialtimes.com/2010/08/jetblue-social-media/

Given the pervasive nature of communications online, you should start planning that strategy now. And, of course, don’t forget to bet on your favorite political racehorse by writing a fat check. It’s not too late. Just ask Target, which has yet to reconcile its widely accepted policy (in the business world) of spreading dollars around like fertilizer to party front runners without a visible thought to the social or ethical implications.

—————————

For more resources, see the Library topic Public and Media Relations.

—————————

Martin Keller runs Media Savant Communications Co., a Public Relations and Media Communications consulting company based in the Twin Cities. Keller has helped move client stories to media that includes The New York Times, Larry King, The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric, plus many other magazines, newspapers, trade journals and other media outlets. Contact him at kelmart@aol.com, or 612-729-8585

Impress Funders With Your Grant Proposal

a-funder-impressed-after-a-grant-proposal

(Writing a “Wow” Needs Statement)

So, how do you capture and hold the attention of the funder reading your proposal?

The first section of each proposal, after an introduction or executive summary, is the Needs Statement. That is where the proposal writer presents and justifies the request for funding.

The funder, of course, will be interested only if the applicant’s research had determined, and can demonstrate, that the project being presented is central to the funder’s agenda. Assuming that to be the case, the Needs Statement is the foundation upon which the entire proposal rests.

The need can be conceptualized as the gap between a situation as it exists and some ideal state.

For example, an animal rights group documents the abuse of animals and proposes a project of public education to reduce such abuse by a projected percentage. The need always must be presented from the point of view of the population to be assisted (animals, in this case).

Inexperienced proposal writers often, mistakenly, substitute the needs of the applicant organization for the needs of those being served.

Strong proposals offer compelling solutions to be carried out by competent, solvent applicants. Funders will not be moved by “needs” that talk about how much the applicant’s endowment has shrunk. [That gets us back to the “readiness” issue of an earlier blog. (See: Grant Readiness)] Only organizations that can present strong credentials will be in a position to address the needs they document.

The Need Statement must be well structured and supported by research to make the case. The need should elicit a, “Wow! I never realized that!” response.

Depending on the subject, citations and data can be used as long as they don’t disrupt the narrative flow. Go back to the newspaper article to see how a skilled reporter builds a case and draws in the reader. Then apply that structure to your proposal need and compare it to the ample number of examples available on the web.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Watch for future (Grants) blogs in this series discussing the other elements of a grant proposal.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Have a comment or a question about starting or expanding your grants program? Email me at Andrew@GrantServices.com..

7 Sins of Social Enterprise

An office desk

As the term social enterprise gains traction in the marketplace, more and more organizations are using that term. There is a real risk that this expansion will dilute the meaning of social enterprise to the point that it means any organization that can claim social as well as financial goals, no matter how vague or meaningless. This has already happened in the environmental realm, where trash haulers call themselves recyclers and oil companies outdo each other claiming to be “greener” than the next.

On that point is a recent blog written by Dionne Chingkoe, where she lists the following “Six Sins of Social Enterprise.”

  1. The Sin of the Hidden Tradeoff – Much like a glittering generality, this sin involves presenting a person, product, firm, or service as social by highlighting a single social attribute. For example, an investment that touts a single social factor such as job creation cannot be classified in the same range as a deal with a wholly integrated social mission.
  2. The Sin of No Proof – As the name suggests, this sin refers to making claims that have no evidence to back them up. Over time, standardized metrics and a common language will be created, making it more evident when social enterprises are not making a measurable impact.
  3. The Sin of Vagueness – This sin involves feel-good language that’s so vague as to be meaningless. For instance, there is a growing trend in the private sector to publish CSR reports that do not contain specified goals or practices.
  4. The Sin of Irrelevance – Making a claim that’s truthful but unimportant or unhelpful.
  5. The Sin of Lesser of Two Evils – In the social enterprise context, this relates to a greater yet relevant debate on who can list on a social investment exchange. Can tobacco companies that train and employ marginalized people be considered social enterprises?
  6. The Sin of Fibbing – This really doesn’t require much of an explanation.

A comment from Jed Emerson mentions a 7th sin, hubris, which involves not only the hype sometimes heard around social enterprise — that it will solve the world’s problems and enable nonprofits/NGOs to stop chasing grant dollars — but also believing that hype. A certain amount of humility is a good thing, that we can actually create all the change we want to see in the world.

——–

Copyright © 2010 Rolfe Larson Associates – Fifteenth Anniversary, 1995 – 2010. Author of Venture Forth! Endorsed by the late Paul Newman of Newman’s Own. Read our weekly blogs on Social Enterprise and Business Planning. Subscribe to our free social enterprise listserv.

4 Rules of Non-Profit Capacity Building

Similar cubes with RULES inscription on windowsill in building

To ensure that capacity building by a non-profit will be successful and actually achieve the outcomes that it plans to accomplish, there are things it must do for this to happen.

  • Consult with target population – Non-profits are created to fill a need, and so it is important that the initiative be driven by the people who will use the services provided by the non-profit. They are the experts on what the issues in the community are and hold the key to how these problems can be resolved.
  • Involve the community – It’s important for your target population to feel a sense of ownership of what your organization is trying to accomplish. So, encourage them to get involved by volunteering for events, as board members, as volunteer manpower to get things done that the organization can’t afford or in whatever capacity they wish to be involved.
  • Build Trust – The constituents of your organization must trust you to be willing to provide input and to participate. You build trust by not making hollow promises that you may not be able to deliver on, by following up to ensure that tasks being done by others are completed, and by building positive relationships with your clientele. If you show sincere interest and caring, you will begin to build trust.
  • Set achievable goals – Your target population will generate a whole list of issues they want dealt with. However, it is important that you choose your first issue as something that is achievable without it taking too much time. You want to be able to work with your constituents to achieve a goal quickly and successfully because success breeds success. The more people in the community that hear you and community members have successfully achieved goals; the more likely they are to buy into the organization and want to be a part of that success.

——————

For more resources, see our Library topic Nonprofit Capacity Building.

——————

What is the Google Sandbox Effect?

Google logo in a black background

Many internet experts agree that new websites are relegated to a “sandbox” by Google.

How Does the Sandbox Work?

The Google Sandbox, though not officially recognized or confirmed by Google, is widely recognized by webmasters worldwide as a type of ‘holding area’ in which new websites ‘do their time’ while they prove themselves worthy of Google ranking. When Google deems the website to be worthy – important and high quality – the site is removed from the sandbox and will show up in Google’s Search Engine Results Page (SERP).

Why did Google Create the Sandbox?

In 2004, it is believed that Google’s algorithm banned new sites from ranking in search results. This was intended to protect the integrity and quality of search results, to discourage spam sites from reaching the top of Google’s results page quickly.

How Can Websites Get Out of the Sandbox?

New websites start out with a page rank of ZERO. If Google deems a site worthy (quality, relevant), even a new site can show up in Google’s search results, but may take up to six months or more (by doing all the right work on Search Engine Optimization – SEO) to achieve its full potential.

What SEO Tactics Affect Google Rankings?

Although it is not an exact science, many SEO tactics affect a site’s placement:

  • Your content is duplicated on other sites
  • If your server is down while Google comes to index (spider/search) your site, it will not show up after that until the next time Google comes to index your site.
  • Your webmaster does not keep up with Google’s algorithm, and your site no longer meets the often-changing requirements.
  • Broken links on your site will greatly penalize your sites’ ranking.
  • How old is your domain name? If it is new, that will count against you. ‘Seasoned’ domain names are much stronger.
  • If your site goes after broad, popular keywords, it is best to change them to long-tail, narrow-niche keywords to decrease the competition and increase your site’s chances of being recognized.

For more information, see Sandbox Effect on Wikipedia

Do you have more tips to share on the Sandbox?

——————

For more resources, see our Library topics Marketing and Social Networking.

——————

You want to work in HR?

Group-of-people-standing-beside-a-white-board

I recently received an email from someone seeking advice on entering the field of HR as a career choice. This is a question I often get and so below is the advice I gave to someone with a degree in accounting. If you have a degree in HR, I would recommend that you also find some experience and education in business, finance and/or accounting. Understanding business is critical to a successful HR career if you really want to make an impact.

1. Find your passion.

2. Try an internship in an HR department. There are so many specialties within the field that this experience could prove valuable to you in determining what type of experience and education you will need to obtain and in which HR specialty. You can find certificate programs in a variety of specialties through local colleges and professional organizations. Take advantage of those.

3. You will definitely need to gain some experience. There are few ways to do this. You could seek out entry level administrative positions within HR or training departments. You could also look for opportunities within companies or organizations that you may currently work or have worked for previously. Retail and restaurant management positions can be a way to gain experience in many aspects of human resources such as hiring, recruiting, training, and supervising others. Recruiting firms and employment agencies also are a great way to get experience in that area and often hire new college graduates.

4. NETWORK. NETWORK. NETWORK. Join local or student SHRM chapters or other HR organizations in your area and get involved. Volunteer and join committees. You will be able to build a broader network and gain some experience by participating actively.

5. Create a LinkedIn Profile. Make sure you join groups with which you have a shared interest. Group postings often include networking and educational event announcements and other topics of interests to you. Also, seek individuals who are in HR roles within the organizations for which you are most interested in working. Try to connect to them and watch their updates. You may find announcements of openings in their companies on their profile.

6. Attempt to connect with an HR person within an organization for which you want to work to set up an informational interview. Use the interview to learn what roles the company has within the department, what skills and experience is needed to work within those roles, and ask for ideas on how you can gain the skills and experience. Make sure you keep a business card when you leave the meeting so that you can properly thank them for their time with a note and keep in contact via LinkedIn or through email.

7. Watch your online presence. Google yourself and keep all of your information and postings professional. Seventy percent of employers will Google you!

A career in HR can be very rewarding, but like accounting it isn’t for everyone. It is important to figure out what aspects of work excite or motivate you. When you find a job you are passionate about, it doesn’t feel like a job. And that is the best career you can have!

What advice can you share?

For more resources, See the Human Resources library.

Sheri Mazurek is a training and human resource professional with over 16 years of management experience, and is skilled in all areas of employee management and human resource functions, with a specialty in learning and development. She is available to help you with your Human Resources and Training needs on a contract basis. For more information send an email to smazurek0615@gmail.com or visit www.sherimazurek.com.

Evaluating Your Major Gifts Prospects

board-members-evaluating-their-major-gift-prospects

Too many people (NPO board members, volunteers and staff) believe that “Evaluation” means determining what a potential donor should give!! That couldn’t be more wrong.

A formal evaluation process has two objectives: to identify a dollar amount that the prospective donor would be likely to be able to afford; and, to identify a (realistic) dollar figure that the donor will be asked to give – a figure that a donor might give if s/he were so motivated.

Though they may sound alike, they’re not the same thing !! And, they are not identified in the same timeframe.

The need to “evaluate” a potential donor ties into two circumstances:
(1) The Prioritization Figure: Since the members of a Major Gifts Committee (staff, board members and volunteers) don’t have an unlimited amount of time to chase every lead for potential major gifts, the list of those individuals must be prioritized, and those individuals with the highest dollar evaluations are placed at the top of the list … and get the most attention.

The focus, initially, is on determining if an individual should be on the Major Gifts Prospects List. Once you’ve determined that the other criteria have been met — see (https://staging.management.org/ blogs/fundraising-for-nonprofits/2010/06/15/who-is-a-major-gift-prospect/), you must come up with your first “evaluation:” Is this person capable of giving an amount equal to 1% or more of your fundraising goal … and where is s/he likely to fall on the “Gift Table” ?? — see (https://staging.management.org/blogs/fundraising-for-nonprofits/2010/09/07/constructing- the-gift-table/)

So, how do you come up with the number you use to prioritize your list of major gifts prospects? …by asking the person who suggested the name in the first place, by asking someone who knows the person fairly well, by getting a feel for the value of that person’s car/home/yacht/toys, by researching what that person has given/committed to other NPOs (just look at their annual reports, plaques in their lobby, stories in newspapers). In essence, the initial evaluation can be based on specific (publicly available) information or on “common knowledge.”

(2) The “Ask” Amount: When actually soliciting the gift/commitment, it is important that the prospect be asked for a specific dollar figure.* That figure must be consistent with the prospect’s ability to give, his/her business and family circumstances, the extent to which s/he may have become involved with the NPO and its mission/programs, the extent to which his/her “need” will be satisfied by making a gift of that amount, and the likelihood that s/he will say, “Yes,” to that amount.

The determination of that figure, therefore, must be part of a serious process. This figure must be based on solid information obtained from reliable sources … with the best source being the person who had been selected to “cultivate” and eventually solicit an individual. The actual determination of the “Ask” will be based on all the information available close-and-prior-to the actual solicitation.

*Oh, yes !! In case you were wondering why it is essential that a prospect be asked for a specific dollar figure, watch for my posting on “Asking For The Gift.”

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Have a comment or a question about starting, evaluating or expanding your fundraising program? With over 30 years of counseling in major gifts, capital campaigns, bequest programs and the planning studies to precede these three, I’ll be pleased to answer your questions. Contact me at AskHank@Major-Capital-Giving.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Have you seen The Fundraising Series of ebooks ??
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
If you would like to comment/expand on the above, or would just like to offer your thoughts on the subject of this posting, we encourage you to “Leave a Reply” at the bottom of this page, click on the feedback link at the top of the page, or send an email to the author of this posting.

Twitter Works

Twitter Logo on Smartphone Screen

Twitter continues to prove its worth as a crisis management tool, often surpassing traditional media sources because of its flexible and easily accessible nature. In a recent blog post, Jessica Ziegler, social media strategist and Vestor Logic’s Director of Social Web Design, described how Twitter took the lead during last week’s Colorado wildfires:

From where I sat it took a while to get any of that information. The TV station websites were on it pretty quickly, but it was bare bones info, a few sentences. The newspaper sites had nothing until much later.

Enter Twitter. Immediately the hashtag #boulderfire was pumping out up-to-the-minute information and photos. The Twitter community in Boulder immediately rallied and began putting residents in contact with people who could help. They kept the information flowing in a constant stream.

By the next day local businesses began using Twitter to offer goods and services to residents displaced by the fire: offers of meals, places to temporarily house pets, hotel rooms. Soon messages of encouragement and thanks to the local firefighters and police began appearing.

Examples like this can be found with nearly every crisis and disaster these days. Whether the incident is local or worldwide, someone has started a hashtag and volumes of information, first hand reports and images are being distributed via Twitter long before traditional media can get on the story.

——————————-
For more resources, see the Free Management Library topic: Crisis Management
——————————-

[Jonathan Bernstein is president of Bernstein Crisis Management, Inc. , an international crisis management consultancy, and author of Keeping the Wolves at Bay – Media Training.]

J is for Joy

The words "choose joy" written on a paper

Bringing Joy to Work

“To bring joy to billions” is the mission statement of Rhonda Byrne, author of The Secret and her newly released book The Power. I know that I’m one of those billion people that she was intending to bring joy to. While her work has brought me joy, she has no idea that it has. And that is like most of our work. We have no idea the kind of joy it brings to others. Maybe you’re involved in creating a product or service that changes lives. Or maybe your product or service doesn’t change lives, but you are doing so by connecting intimately with your colleagues and customers. We’ll never know the kind of joy that we will bring to another person. We just have to trust we do and keep on being joyful in our work.

Lately I’ve been observing others bringing joy to their work, which elevates my joy. Here is what I’ve noticed. The loving arms of my son’s preschool teachers welcoming him for his first day of school. The passionate woman over the phone raising money for a cause she deeply believes in. The hugs and encouraging words two facilitators share with their participants, those struggling with chronic or life-threatening illnesses. The store clerk patiently waiting to serve her long line of customers with a smile. The employee inspired to start a special interest group at her organization that is changing people’s lives.
What does joy look like in your work? The latest project that I’ve been working on is bringing me so much joy! The following is the announcement that I sent to my database about it and it brings me joy to share it with you now.

Project GratOtude Has Arrived

Feeling gratitude and not expressing it is like wrapping a present and not giving it. – William Arthur Ward

Greetings,
Yesterday I celebrated my birthday and thought about what it might be like to leave the gifts I received unopened. I would miss out on the experience to share pure joy with those whom I receive gifts from and with others who receive mine. According to many different experts, the importance of gratitude is the key to living a fulfilling, joyful life. While this might seem obvious, very few people actually take the time to work on integrating gratitude into their daily lives.

Recently I received a huge gift of inspiration to start a movement encouraging people to be more grateful, naming it Project GratOtude.
Today on Sept. 13 I am unwrapping this present and giving it to you on the same day that Oprah is beginning her farewell season.
Project GratOtude is dedicated to honor Oprah because she is one of my greatest teachers on the subject of how to give big and dream big.

Come find out about this grass-roots effort to inspire ONE million people to make a difference through the Project GratOtude Challenge at www.projectgratOtude.com. Join our community and we’ll give you all the secrets and tools to be MORE GRATEFUL.

We’ve gotta GREAT feeling about what’s in store for all of us who are embarking on this Project GratOtude journey together. You will feel joy rising for yourself as you make a difference and others will catch your contagious energy!

With GratITude,
Janae Bower

p.s. I invite you to join this challenge, which will bring YOU joy through practicing gratitude: www.projectgratOtude.com

*******************
For more resources, see our Library topic Spirituality in the Workplace.

——————

Janae Bower is an inspirational speaker, award-winning author and training consultant. She founded Finding IT, a company that specializes in personal and professional development getting to the heart of what matters most.

Women and Senior Organizational Leadership

Four women working in a business meeting in a coffee shop

Women, Power, and Leadership

In Cathy Curran’s blog on July 7, Women, Power, and Leadership, she talks about how, in the past 40 years, women have become increasingly important players in the business and professional worlds, including positions of leadership. She says that while a glass ceiling still exists and, despite the fact that more and more women are getting past it, that women continue to underrepresented in leadership roles. Cathy states that one reason more women have not made the transition into leadership is because the socialization of women still does not prepare them to handle organizational power and influence. She contends that among all the leadership skills taught to prospective female managers and leaders, education in the successful use of personal and organizational power is lacking. Cathy suggests that some of the more individualistic – and traditionally more masculine — skills and qualities, such as independence in thought, action, and decision making, taking risks, and understanding competition, are ones that women will need to intentionally put more time into developing in order to make a successful transition into organizational leadership roles.

Gender Disparity in Senior Leadership

I certainly agree that the leadership traits prioritized by most organizations could largely be described as masculine or agentic (i.e. someone that demonstrates assertiveness, competitiveness, independence, courageousness). Not only that, but I would argue the majority of competency models in organizations continue to manifest a bias toward traditional leadership qualities and skills. Despite this, the number of women in the managerial and professional ranks in the United States has steadily increased in the past 30 years, and research now shows that women currently hold 51% of managerial and professional positions (Welle, 2004). It is interesting that while these numbers are significantly larger today than ever before, the movement of women into senior leadership positions continues to be incredibly slow. According to Welle, among Fortune 500 companies, only 16% of corporate officers, 14% of board directors, 5% of top earners, and just over 1% of CEOs are women.

Influence of Gender Stereotypes

What is the explanation for this continued disparity at the top? Recent studies reveal that although gender stereotypes are slowly but surely changing in the corporate ranks, women in these settings continue to be viewed as having more nurturing, supportive, and communal tendencies, and are evaluated more harshly than men if they demonstrate these qualities, especially in more senior leadership roles. Ironically, women managers, on the average, actually score higher than men on objective measures of agentic or traditional leadership qualities, but still are not well represented in executive positions (Duehr & Bono, 2006).

Bias at the Top

It appears that more traditionally feminine qualities, while more often valued and perceived as effective at middle manager levels, are not seen as having the same relative value for senior level positions, especially in larger companies. It seems clear that in a majority of corporations, the competencies most valued at senior levels of leadership continue to be the more traditionally masculine (e.g. being keenly focused on the financial bottom line, capacity for critical and strategic thinking, and the ability to make risky and independent decisions). There are of course many unfortunate ironies and outcomes associated with these biases. While many women appear to possess the traits viewed as important for senior leadership, they are frequently not perceived to have enough of these qualities, especially by the individuals that make decisions about senior leader advancement. If this is true, it would seem that further development in women of certain, more agentic qualities and talents, will be important — as Kathy Curran states – but it is likely that changes in perception, or a changing of the guard, may also need to take place. If the glaring gender disparity in executive positions is going to shift, there will likely need to be a perceptual shift within the ranks of those that make promotional and hiring decisions for these roles.