What Would Love Do Now?

olleagues-hugging-each-other-

I had a challenging conversation recently with a business woman. She was really upset about something I had done, and as I was trying to fix the problem, she screamed at me. It’s not fun to have someone scream at you, especially when you are trying to help them. Ever have one of those conversations?

Luckily for me I have practiced NVC for several years. I listened empathically to her screaming until she slowed down enough for me to calmly state what was happening. She stormed away as I went to work on the issue. I felt a bit numb and did my best to fix the situation.

Afterwards, when I knew the problem hadn’t been fixed, I went into a lot of fear around what her response was going to be. I also was mad at myself for what I had done a couple weeks earlier to fix the problem, which only made the problem worse. I tried to think of the next right course of action to take.

I had a hard time thinking clearly for the next couple of hours. I felt a lot of fear and dread about the problem not being fixed. I had a hard time focusing on my work and imagined all sorts of awful scenarios that could occur. It was quite a drama play going on in my head. I was aware of how much I was scaring myself. I stopped and reminded myself I didn’t need to go down the path of fear.

To calm down and collect myself, I watched some inspiring videos and posts on FB. I had to sort out what was the next right course of action to take to remedy the situation.

Then I remembered my all-time favorite advice. “When you are uncertain what is the right course of action to take, ask yourself this: What would Love do now?”

So there I was at the fork in the road. I could keep going down the path of fear or I could find out what would Love do now. I reflected on this question as I moved through my day. I got a few ideas of how I wanted to handle the business woman next time I spoke to her. I started to calm down and forgive myself for what I had done earlier. I started to give myself some compassion and affirm that it would all work out. I remembered not to sweat the small stuff.

The situation is still not over. I just need to reminder to follow the path of Love. I can keep choosing Love (capital Love for spiritual love, kindness, compassion) rather than stay mired in fear and dread.

If you need to sort out a dilemma or make a difficult choice, consider the question “What would Love do now?”. Practice using this phrase next time someone gets upset with you or you get upset with yourself.

It never hurts to keep choosing Love over fear.

********************

For more resources, see our Library topic Spirituality in the Workplace.

——————

Visit Linda’s website- www.lindajferguson.com for information about her coaching work, keynote presentations, seminar topics, and books.

Linda’s new book, “Staying Grounded in Shifting Sand” is available in paperback or ebook – Click here to order.

“Like” – https://www.facebook.com/LindaJFerguson – if you want to get notices of other blog posts and updates of Linda’s work.

Click this link to order Linda’s 10th Anniversary edition of “Path for Greatness: Work as Spiritual Service”.

SE: Empowering Mission-Driven Entrepreneurs (Marc Lane)

Picture-of-male-and-female-entrepeurs-smiling-to-a-camera

Marc Lane, arguably the most prolific writer in the social enterprise sector, last year wrote another one of his useful books, entitled: Social Enterprise: Empowering Mission-Drive Entrepreneurs. It’s a good book to glance through, and even more important, to have nearby on your bookshelf for when you have a legal question about social enterprise. For a lawyer, he writes pretty well — which is high praise!

Continue reading “SE: Empowering Mission-Driven Entrepreneurs (Marc Lane)”

The Value of How-To Versus Commentary in Training

Group-of-workers-in-a-business-training
I believe I tend more toward commentary.

I decided to mull this over this morning. If you’ve been to this site before you can certainly find both. I believe I tend more toward commentary.

“How-to” is easier to come by and you don’t have to really know anything about training just where to find a piece where someone else tells you how they do it. Essentially, we have gone from a testimonial (which may be best practice) and taken the real meaning out of it and made something someone thinks there is an easy way to do a job. This isn’t the proverbial rocket science; nor is it, “anything you can do I can do better.”

I have written articles containing the words “how-to” simply to draw in an audience I would like to change. I see nothing wrong with “how-to”s if they offer a certain amount of latitude, and offer options beyond the words on he page. Sometimes that’s the problem with the blog system: authors anxious to put something out don’t realize the importance.

I see nothing wrong with “how-to”s if they offer a certain amount of latitude, and offer options beyond the words on the page.

Don’t waste our time. I’m not a know-it-all when it comes to training, but I do know training from being in the trenches and being in the management pool. I am also a psychologist and devout people observer.

I never claim to have all the answers but offer considerations–even other ideas I may not agree with at the moment. It is a changing world, a changing workforce.

One thing I have noticed is that the marketplace seems focused on groups rather than the whole. Maybe it is the mark of getting older that I see a lot of pandering and assumptions made to a younger audience with toys and anxious to place the toys instead of trainer. Question is always: does it do the job better because the trainer is now out of the picture. Ouch!

Workers are getting older, those that still have jobs are suspicious by anything brought in by the young that doesn’t seem well thought out. So, how much is just disregarded. Hence: the “how-to,” but it’s start.

Every “how-to” should be balanced with “where do we go from here.” What next? So, mayby that’s the next step, but I have a feeling it’s going to be the gadgets–so much fun and “gee whiz.”

So, here’s my advice and commentary:

  • Use the “how-to” as a starting point, keeping in mind that your company may have distinctions, but think hard before you modify. You could have missed something.
  • Note the source of the “how-to” to give you some idea of credibility.
  • Again, don’t let this be the only the thing you read on the subject. Look at what other companies are doing; the subject matter doesn’t even have to be related to yours to have good ideas you can use, and lastly, while we are on the internet,
  • read the commentary for what it’s worth.
  • Make sure you can tell the difference from grousing and sharing of ideas.

I’m keeping it brief and saying just enough I hope. Commentary versus how-to. It doesn’t really matter. What does matter is the way we use the material. Sorry I’ve been away for awhile, and I’m sure you kept busy without me. I still managed to publish my futuristic novel, In Makr’s Shadow, this trip. You can purchase it rather inexpensively on Smashbooks as well as any other major e-book outlet a little later. It’s about a time when we don’t think we are smart enough to keep from destroying our own world, and leave it all up to artificial intelligence. Don’t forget my back-to-the-base, The Cave Man Guide to Training and Development. You can find the books in the same place for a pittance. Meanwhile there is my own website to tell you what I do and links to all I write, including dramatic criticism.

Happy training.

For more resources about training, see the Training library.

Talent Management: Leverage Your Top Talent Before You Lose them

Group-of-working-having-conflict-due-to-workplace-crisis

Do you have an exceptional performer on your team — a person who stands head and shoulders above everyone else?

If you do, it can be a wonderful gift for a manager to have an employee whom you can count on to get the right results; who thinks about what else needs to be done without being told; who doesn’t need to be pushed or motivated; who is always asking to do more.

Too often managers unintentionally hinder or discourage their star performers. This counter-productive behavior is not ill-intended. It’s often because the manager isn’t sure how to motivate someone who is so exceptionally talented. If you are lucky enough to have such high-performers on your team, try these three things to motivate.

1. Push them to the next level.
Stretch and challenge stars. Find out what they are good at and what they need to learn and craft assignments accordingly.
2. Let them shine.
Don’t hide your stars. Give them visibility. Let others know what they are doing. When they look good, you do too.
3. Let them go.
Top performers need room to grow. If it makes sense for their career development, let them move on. They will appreciate it.

Why Do It?

First, it’s remarkably satisfying and gratifying to see someone grow their skills and abilities and know you had some small role to play in it. You’ll get emails and have connections with these folks for years to come. One of those gifts that just keep giving.

Second, you are far more likely to get the opportunity to move on from your current role and do something new because you are more likely to have clear successors. One of your goals, as a manager or leader, should be to work yourself out of a job. As one manager said to me:

“I get bored doing the same thing… so I make every effort to grow and recognize people who I supervise. If they shine, it shows that I’m a good manager of talent and then it opens door s to better assignments.”

Management Success Tip

It’s true that most people must work to survive and money is certainly a motivator — but up to a point. . Money gets people in the door but it’s not what makes them stay or do their best work.
For your employees to achieve great things, they need to experience purpose, recognition and involvement. See the video “Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us.”

Do you want to develop your Management Smarts?

Are You Connecting With the Right People?

A business woman and her colleagues having a handshake with a new client

Friends, colleagues and family can be great resources for career planning and career advice. But we also need relationships with a variety of individuals and groups to help us succeed.

For example, we need people who can offer information or expertise; who are influential or can provide political insights; who will give us candid feedback to help us grow; and who can provide the big picture that we need.

In How Many Networks Do you Have, I suggested developing three distinct ones – your work network, your wisdom network and your “out of the box” network. Now I’m suggesting that you examine relationships within those networks and determine which ones are the most valuable.

A Relationship Audit

Assigning your relationships into categories may seem cold and impersonal. Yet, I would say most of us do it intuitively, especially in the workplace. The hard truth is we can’t be everywhere at once. We can’t be all things to all people. Our time and energy are scarce resources so we need to allocate them wisely.

So we need to conduct a relationship audit. For example, look at your current work network. Who are the people in it and how important are they? Here are three ways to decide on how to manage these relationships to get the most benefit.

1. Invest: is your strategy for critical relationships that are especially important for getting your job done. These could be good working relationships that you want to maintain, problematic relationships that are so vital you need to give them special attention, or relationships with people on whom can be influential in getting you to the next level

2. Hold: is strategy for relationships that are fine and don’t need special attention or effort at this time. This doesn’t mean they’re unimportant, just that they’re clicking along fine and you don’t have to invest additional resources in the now.

3. Divest: is your strategy for relationships that aren’t so critical or important. You may spend less time, less energy or fewer resources. Warning: Be careful. It’s usually better to adopt the hold strategy then to burn bridges. Burning bridges can be appropriate however in cases where there may be legal, ethical or dangerous consequences.

Once you have identified critical relationships, now it’s time to identify critical gaps – ones that don’t exist but ought to or ones that you need to pay more attention to.

  1. Does your list appear a little sparse for specific kind of relationships? (Internal – up down, sideways) or (external – recruiters, customers, suppliers, professional colleagues?
  2. Do you have relationships with other functions, department, teams or groups important to you? For example, can provide key information, money, political support and so on?
  3. Has there been a change of leadership at the top? How can you get on their radar?
  4. What are you doing to nurture the critical ones you have so that they don’t die on the vine?

Career Success Tip:

In this time of change, paying attention to the quality of your interactions and engagement with both external and internal relationships will be a key factor in maintaining and growing your professional career. But remember it’s not just to focus on what you can get but what you can give to each of these strategic relationships.

Do you want to develop Career Smarts?

Professional Fund Raisers & Up Front Fees

Two fundraisers discussing an up-front- fee

A note from a reader:
Hank, I am a volunteer for a nonprofit organization that has been approached by “professional fund raisers” that are looking for “up-front” fees to raise money for us.

In my experience, and I have paid out thousands of dollars to these individuals that promise you the moon and when it comes time to deliver … the excuses abound.

The professional fundraisers say it is unethical to pay a percentage on the money raised. Is it not unethical to take money from a non profit and not deliver?
========================

My immediate reaction to the phrase “professional fund raiser” is one of anger and disgust — feelings that are directed at both the “fund raisers” and those who hire them.

It’s okay for an organization to hire a fundraising professional to work with them to create/implement/maintain a productive, cost-effective fundraising program. It is an extremely bad idea for NPOs to hire outsiders to raise money for them.

No outsider can speak with the conviction and passion for an organization’s mission as can board members, staff, volunteers and the people served by the NPO.

Outsiders, if they are asking people for money on a face-to-face basis, can, of course, fake it. So the organization has to decide if that’s who they are … people that hire others to “fake it.”

If outsiders are raising the money, two questions that must be asked are: (1) how much of the money that is raised will actually get to the NPO; and, (2) will the people giving the money or paying to attend an event be informed, as is their right, of how much of their money will go in the “professional’s” pocket and how much to the nonprofit ??

Also, the “fund raiser’s” fee should be agreed upon in advance – based on the time and effort needed to make it happen (not based on dollar goals or dollars raised), and included in a contract that specifies what services will be provided in what timeframe.

No “fund raiser” should have their full fee paid up-front. That’s just bad business, and you’d certainly not want your donors to know that you do that.

If those “professional fund raisers” can guarantee that “X” dollars can/will be raised, then they should have no problem putting that guarantee in a contract. The NPO will then have recourse (with State support) if the goal is not met !!

And, FYI, most States have an office (usually the Secretary of State) that oversees and regulates fundraising, and many require that copies of contracts with “fund raisers” be provided to the State for approval. Many also publish lists of “professional fund raising” companies and their track records in their States.

There are a few “professional fund raisers” that operate ethically, that raise money at a fairly low cost-per-dollar-raised, but the majority of the firms that I’ve seen listed on State reports forward too little of the money raised to the NPOs; and, high fundraising costs raise ethical questions, and suggest that the nonprofit is poorly managed.

Too many nonprofits are created by well-meaning people who have no clue about what’s involved in running/maintaining an organization; and, nonprofit organizations with leaders who won’t take the time to learn what they should be doing, and then won’t do what they should, should probably not survive. Hiring an outside “fund raiser” is the often leadership’s way of not having to do what nonprofit leaders are supposed to do.

As to the last two points in the email….
• You can’t lose money on a fundraising professional. You can ignore their good
    advice/direction, but you will have gotten value for the fee you paid.
• If a nonprofit is paying a “fund raiser” in advance, it’s the organization, as much as it is
    the “fund raiser,” that is acting unethically.
• Taking money without delivering what was promised sounds to me like “fraud.”
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Have a comment or a question about starting, evaluating or expanding your fundraising program? With over 30 years of counseling in major gifts, capital campaigns, bequest programs and the planning studies to precede these three, I’ll be pleased to answer your questions. Contact me at Hank@Major-Capital-Giving.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

If you would like to comment/expand on the above, or would just like to offer your thoughts on the subject of this posting, we encourage you to “Leave a Reply” at the bottom of this page, click on the feedback link at the top of the page, or send an email to the author of this posting.

The Cloud And Mobile Tech Writing

A young lady working with her laptop

The cloud (virtual software service) and mobile devices are now being used more and more as a means to provide users easier access to documentation and training. What does that mean for Technical Writers? It means more opportunities, work, imagination, and knowledge,

More opportunities will exist for the Technical Writer to become involved in working with the latest authoring tools and applications to create the written material (from requirements, specifications, compliance, training, marketing material, etc.), the latest mediums (mobile devices, i.e., tablets and smart phones) used to display the work, and the latest service technology (the cloud). The Technical Writer‘s passion for learning will be quenched in this area..

More work will exist for the Technical Writer, because many corporations, public and private, now want to place their documents on the cloud, but in what fashion and how will they all be managed, organized, tracked, and remain secure, which documents should be cloud based for archiving and which ones should not (i.e., sensitive matter), and which ones need to be easily accessed? Will training and marketing material and proposals go onto the cloud for easier accessibility, but not specifications? To answer this, the Technical Writer will have to interview all stakeholders up front before creating any documents for the cloud or mobile devices.

More imagination will be needed by the Technical Writer to organize, categorize, and manage the material in such a way that the users can access what they want and need efficiently. Should an application be created up front so that the user can easily view what he is searching for and then present all related documents, or should they be listed within simple folders by project or both or should the company invest in new applications such as content management systems? Throughout the process, the Technical Writer as a visual and user experience designer has to ensure ease of navigation and graphically friendly interfaces to provide what the user wants and needs.

More knowledge will be required by the Technical Writer to grasp the new technology, and to also remember the requirements of the organization and its stakeholders. The Technical Writer will need to understand the technology’s capabilities, understand how it fits within the business structure (and system architecture) of the company, and be able to convey it to others, especially when writing Request For Proposals. This is emphasized because without this knowledge, the writer will not be able to document nor communicate the business reasoning, process, scope, nor desired outcome of the project.

Throughout this whole process, consistency and order must be maintained. One of the attributes of being a good Technical Writer is that of maintaining consistency and accuracy. To accomplish this, the Technical Writer will need to perform functions as an analyst and a project manager in order to keep the goal in sight. This will not be an easy task, but if done in small steps, is achievable.

Dane Elicits Pain About Obama’s Public Speaking

president Barack Obama addressing the public

Editorial by Jonathan Bernstein

Does being the chief resident of the White House erode your public speaking ability?

Is it time to find some new speech writers?

Are you making so many speaking mistakes that they become trends noticeable not just back home, but even by a DANISH TV station?

Yes, yes and YES, Mr. Obama. English, apparently, doesn’t have to be your native language for a journalist to recognize some ridiculous redundancy in what you’ve told world leaders on international television broadcasts.

Disclosure: I voted for you Mr. President, and as a Speech Communications major and public relations professional, have long admired your eloquence – not just when using the teleprompter that has resulted in much teasing, but also off the cuff. Empirically, I have observed a steady deterioration in the originality and fire in your public speaking, but none so embarrassingly obvious as those showcased by host Thomas Buch-Anderson on this clip from the Danish TV show Detektor.

Seen it for yourself? Stopped laughing yet? Alright, let’s check the score card! We have five different countries told that they “punch above their weight,” a boxing analogy that would, of course, be completely meaningless to a high percentage of your audience. Then you told three that the U.S. “has no stronger ally” than them – akin to someone telling the same number of friends that each was your BEST friend. And at least seven more were told they were “one of our strongest allies,” another horse-race with no clear winner.

How about you and your speechwriters starting to cross-reference new material with old – something rather easy to do with the same gadget on which I’m writing this editorial – and, as necessary, learn to use a thesaurus. Or more imagination. This sort of amateurism is an entirely unavoidable embarrassment that helps to create a crisis of confidence in your competence and sincerity.

——————————-
For more resources, see the Free Management Library topic: Crisis Management
——————————-

[Jonathan Bernstein is president of Bernstein Crisis Management, Inc., an international crisis management consultancy, and author of Manager’s Guide to Crisis Management and Keeping the Wolves at Bay – Media Training.]

History of Organization Development (Part 3 of 6) — A Timeline of Who Did What and When

Business-persons-in-an-organization-brainstorming-for-a-project.j

(Guest post from John Scherer, Co-Director of Scherer Leadership International, with Billie Alban, President of Alban & Williams, Ltd. This is the third blog post in a six-part series about the history of OD.)

Introduction to this Blog Series

In the first part of this series, we explored some of our ancient ancestors in the practice of changing the way people in groups and larger human systems get things done. In Part 2 we named some of the most significant people from psychology whose ideas have shaped our current way of doing Organization Development.

In this segment, we want you to see and even study the following OD Time Line, created by Billie Alban, that shows the major players and movements in the field, starting with Kurt Lewin in the mid-1940’s. (Hundreds of people have contributed to this field of OD. We had to make choices, and apologize to those who do not find their names listed.)

To see the timeline, click here.

The Origins of OD Time-Line

Colleague Billie Alban has done everyone who practices OD a huge service by creating what is known as ‘The OD Time-Line.’ Billie and her colleagues developed it for use in their now well-established practice of Large Scale Change (See Alban & Bunker, 1997). Barbara Bunker and myself (Billie Alban) developed the Time Line concept, and Sara Shea did the graphics.

The time-line shows:

a) What was happening as OD came into being—and evolved,

b) The core OD concepts and when they emerged,

c) The major contributors—theorists, researchers, writers, practitioners,

d) The significant external forces and events that paralleled—and impacted—the birth and early years of our field, and

e) The institutions that were first to adapt OD as part of their workplace culture.

How to Read and Use the Time Line

As you can see, the horizontal axis is time, with the decades rolling from left to right. Along the side, vertically, are Core Concepts. (Even though, for graphic reasons, they are shown to run across the page as discreet elements, they are often merging and blending with other elements. For instance, data feedback is also used in team building, and systems theory is applied in many of the core concepts.)

Action Research

Lewin’s now-classic postulate—’No research without action; no action without research’—defines this element on the chart. One of OD’s fundamental principles is the use of data-gathering as the basis for planning subsequent interventions.

The survey-feedback process was pioneered by Ron Lippitt and is a staple in every OD consultant’s repertoire today. Ron Lippitt and his brother, Gordon Lippitt, pioneered methods for feeding back the data and for ‘implication derivation,’ something they insisted needed to be done with the client, not for the client.

Rensis Likert developed a widely-used approach to action research using a scale of responses, allowing people to indicate how strongly they held a particular position on some item of organizational concern—thus quantifying ‘soft’ data.

Robert Blake and Jane Mouton’s Managerial Grid fast became a research tool of choice because of its strong and clear visual presentation, making it immediate useful to both the consultant and the client. (More about that in a later issue.)

If you look toward the end of this line you will note something called AAR, or ‘after action review’ something used by the US Army to analyze military engagements. The process grew, in part, from NTL’s work with Army pioneers and was based on a process called EIAG, developed by early Episcopalian NTL OD consultant/trainer, Nancy Geyer. In this model, first you Experience, something ‘happens’ or you do something. Next you Identify important points in that experience or action; you then Analyze that incident, using appropriate models or theories, and then you Generalize: What have I learned here that I need to apply to the next situation?

Survey feedback, although used initially by industrial psychologists, has been part of the OD field, and widely used, with teams as well as entire organizations. There are surveys that look at employee morale, perceptions of leadership, clarity about mission and strategy, physical plant, technology, etc. Likert’s scale, in a Profile of Organization Characteristics, demonstrated that when a ‘System Four ‘ method for making decisions was used (a participative process), it was more likely to reflect a successful organization and satisfied employees. Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid looked at the role of management in integrating concern for people with concern for productivity, using a system-wide approach. Data was collected from managers through surveys that were later used in workshops they attended to increase their ability to work with their subordinates, bosses and peers.

One of the first applications of computers to assist in the action research process was The People-Performance Profile, developed by John Scherer and Bob Crosby in 1978.[1] The PPP measured and fed back computer-scored information to the individual on personal factors (e.g. Exercise, Nutrition, Alcohol and Drug Use, Stress Management), to the work group (Decision-Making, Conflict Management, Problem-Solving, etc.), and top management (Strategic Planning, Physical Environment, Organizational Stress, etc.) In 1983 Ron Lippitt told the developers he considered the PPP and the high-involvement process used to share the data with clients, ‘One of the most significant contributions to action research since Lewin.’

The Internet

It will be interesting to see over time the impact of the Internet on Action Research and surveys. Many organizations are now surveying their employees in real time via the Internet, providing for the first time essentially instantaneous feedback on whatever elements need to be researched. One such survey of organizational culture, developed by a Dutch consultant Gert Hofstede, was a study of 130,000 IBM employees in 40 different countries!

Reference List of Books from This Series

For More Resources About Organization Development, see These Free Management Library Topics:

John Scherer is Co-Director of Scherer Leadership International, and Billie Alban is President of Alban & Williams, Ltd. This blog is an adaptation of their chapter in the ‘bible’ of the field of OD, Practicing Organization Development (3rd Edition, 2009, Rothwell, W.J., Stavros, J.M., Sullivan. R.L. and Sullivan, A. Editors). Many colleagues contributed, among them Warner Burke, John Adams, Saul Eisen, Edie Seashore, Denny Gallagher, Marvin Weisbord Juanita Brown and others. They have drawn heavily from Weisbord’s wonderfully rich, easy-to-read, and well-documented description of the origins of the field in Productive Workplaces (1987 and revised in 2012).

The post also had contributions from OD pioneers Ron Lippitt, John Adams, John Sherwood, Tom and Susan Isgar, Flo Hoylman, Rad Wilson and Juanita Brown, and also from OD pioneers Ron Lippitt, John Adams, John Sherwood, Tom and Susan Isgar, Flo Hoylman, Rad Wilson and Juanita Brown.

Panning for Gold

A-sack-of-gold-ores-poured-out.
A speaker shared the analogy of “Panning for Gold” as a metaphor for finding God’s love. Just like when you are trying to pan for gold there is a lot of dirt or muck that needs to be sifted through first before you can even see the gold hidden within. This is like our lives, the golden nuggets and sparkling gems are within us. Inside of each of us is God’s love just waiting for us to discover, a golden gem that will make our hearts and souls sparkle like never before. Yet most of us have filled our lives with a lot of muck so we get stuck. We might attempt to clean out the muck here and there, yet soon we stop because we are frustrated with the results when we don’t find “the gold” right away.
What I’m writing about is a great example. When I heard the speaker share this concept I took some time earlier to meditate on it and ponder what it meant in my life. What muck is getting me stuck, what’s blocking me from finding this gold all the time? The gold is there and we all have it, it’s just our choice if we are going to decide to try to find it, to pan for it. Once you do and you see what gems in your life you can uncover, you’ll get hooked to keep panning.
For me it’s like every day I’m so excited to see how God is going to speak to me. What gem am I going to discover today? I always can tell when I take the time to pan for it; which means for me that I take alone time to pray, read, meditate, write or any other spiritual rituals. It might be one of the speakers I heard that gets me excited to go deeper and sift through the muck. Or it might be something that came to me during my bible study time. I know when I’m ready to pan is when I can feel a great pull. It’s like I see the tip of something shining in my life that makes me want to go deeper and deeper. So I go within and search for the gold. The gold for me is often how to be more of what we are all called to be – more loving, more peaceful, more joyful.
The days that I choose not to go deeper and pan for the golden nuggets within are the days that I can tell I’ve missed out on something. I just feel off – less enthusiastic, less kind, less passionate, less gratitude, less patient and ultimately less inspired. I can see and feel the difference and I know others around me can too.
The good news is that the gold’s there and we all know what it’s like to feel this inside of us and how different we are because we have that inner peace, joy and love. We just need to take the time and make it a priority to go panning, not just once but daily. So even though we missed the actual panning days of the gold rush from long ago, we all have the opportunity to go within ourselves and find God’s golden gems just waiting to glow brightly in our lives.

***************************

For more resources, see our Library topic Spirituality in the Workplace.

——————

Janae Bower is an inspirational speaker, award-winning author and training consultant. She founded Finding IT, a company that specializes in personal and professional development getting to the heart of what matters most. She started Project GratOtude, a movement to increase gratitude in people’s lives.