Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations

Person Holding Gray Twist Pen and White Paper on Brown Wooden Table

Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Sections of This Article Include


Introduction

The organization’s structure, or design, is the overall arrangement of the organization’s various roles, processes and their relationships in the organization. The design of an organization is a means to accomplishing the organization’s overall goal — the structure is not an end in itself. In systems theory terms, the design ensures that the appropriate inputs go through the necessary processes to produce the required outputs to produce the intended outcomes.


Broad Overview of Primary Legal Forms of For-Profit Organizations

For-profit businesses are usually of three primary legal forms, including unincorporated, corporations and limited liability companies. There are other forms of businesses, too, for example, nonprofit, franchises, government-owned corporations, cooperatives, limited liability corporation (“L3C”), etc. The three primary
forms are explained below. (More information is available in the topic Enterprise Law.)

A corporation is a privately owned corporation or a publicly held corporation, depending on whether the corporation is owned privately or by the public at large.

Business people should seek the counsel of a lawyer when determining what legal form of business they should choose.

1. Unincorporated (sole proprietorships or partnerships)

Most small for-profit businesses are unincorporated. As an unincorporated organization, you can be a sole proprietor or in a partnership. A sole proprietorship is owned by one person or a marriage. Business activity is viewed by the IRS as your personal activity, for example, business income and taxes are viewed as your personal income and taxes. The sole proprietor is personally liable for the business.

A partnership can be a general partnership or a limited partnership. A general partnership is viewed by the IRS essentially as two or more sole proprietors equally responsible for the business. The terms of sole proprietorship apply fully to each partner. In limited partnership includes one or more general partners and one or more limited partners. Limited partners are liable for activities of the business to the extent of their investment.

2. Corporations (C Corporations and S Corporations)

A corporation is formed as its own legal entity, apart from the individuals who own and/or formed the organization. (The corporation can be either for-profit or nonprofit. More on nonprofits later on below.). The principals of a for-profit business decide to incorporate mostly to shield them for personal liability for activities of the business and/or to sell stock in the business. A corporate Boards of Directors oversees policy and strategy for corporations, whether for-profit or nonprofit. Principals and board members of for-profit corporations typically have little or no liability for operations of the corporation, unless the owners or board members broke federal and/or state laws in running the corporation.

Theoretically the for-profit and nonprofit corporation exists forever, past the death of its owners. For-profit corporations can be a C Corporation or Subchapter S Corporation. More about these in the topic Enterprise Law.)

3. Limited Liability Companies (LLC)

The LLC is a relatively new form that combines the advantages of a corporation (minimum personal liability, selling stock, etc.) with those of a sole proprietorship and partnership (sharing management decisions, profit, etc). The LLC is an increasingly popular form of organization.


Broad Overview of Primary Legal Forms of Non-Profit Organizations

As noted above, for-profit businesses are usually of three legal forms, including unincorporated, corporations and limited liability companies. There are other forms of businesses, too, for example, nonprofit, franchises, government-owned corporations, cooperatives, etc. The following link provides more information about nonprofits, including their many legal forms.
What is a Nonprofit?


Traditional Organizational Structures and Design in Businesses

See the organization charts depicted in Traditional Organizational Structures and Design in Businesses.

Functional Structure

Most organizations start out with a functional structure, or a small variation of this structure. This is the basic “building block” for other structures. It is useful because it recognizes that there are different types of recurring management functions (Manufacturing, Sales, Marketing, etc.) in the organization and it also ensures coordination of these activities by a central office.

Divisional Structure

This structure is typically for well established organizations that have multiple and often complex products such that each product requires its own functionally designed structure. Similar to the functional structure, it recognizes that there are different types of product lines, each of which requires different its own functional structure of different management functions.

Matrix Structure

This is referred to as a matrix because it is essentially a grid with rows and columns. The different rows represent different management functions and the columns represent different products. In this structure, highly skilled personnel in each management function are shared across different product lines. Thus, each person reports to a functional manager and a product manager.


Traditional Organizational Structures and Design in Nonprofits

See the organization charts depicted in Traditional Organizational Structures and Design in Nonprofits.

Functional Structure With Non CEO

New nonprofits often start by having no paid staff, including no paid CEO. The CEO might even be a member of the Board of Directors — a practice that is often frowned upon by key stakeholders because a CEO reports to the Board of Directors and, thus, there is an inherent conflict of interest in having a CEO on the Board. Thus, the CEO usually is not on the Board later on. Staff members are all volunteers.

Functional Structure With a CEO

The CEO reports to the Board of Directors and is not on the Board. Staff members are paid as is the CEO. In this structure, different employees might begin being associated with certain different programs.

Program-Based Structure With a CEO

In this structure, the nonprofit has different programs each of which has employees dedicated to operating a certain program for the nonprofits clients. The manager of each program reports to the CEO.

If the nonprofit continues to expand with each program expanding as well, then it might evolve into a divisional structure as explained in the above section.


New Structures of Organizations

Driving Forces Causing New Structures

In organizational design, there is a guideline that “form follows function”. In other words, the structure of the organization is a strategy to work toward the purpose and priorities of the organization. There are numerous driving forces that are causing organizations to re-think their priorities, for example, driving forces such as increasing diversity in the workforce, expanding markets around the world, and the public’s increasing demands for more transparency and accountability for how organizations operate.
Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design

In addition, to become more adaptable to the rapidly changing environments outside and inside of organizations, organizations are resorting to different structures in how they operate.

B-Corporations

From the B-Corp website “Certified B Corporations are a new kind of business that balances purpose and profit. They are legally required to consider the impact of their decisions on their workers, customers, suppliers, community, and the environment. This is a community of leaders, driving a global movement of people using business as a force for good.”
B-Corp as a Competitive Edge

This Article is in a Series About Understanding Organizational Structures and Design

This article is the sixth in the series which includes:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems

4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational Culture
6. Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design
9. Basic Guidelines for Organizational Design
10. Wrap Up: Grasping the Big Picture in Organizations (video)


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.


Additional Perspectives on Forms of Organizations


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm

Serious young businesswoman working with report in office

Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm

© Copyright Carter
McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC
.

Sections of This Article Include

Driving Forces of Change
Traits of the New Paradigm

Also consider
Related Library Topics


Driving Forces of Change

Around the 1960s and on to today, the environment of today’s organizations
has changed a great deal. A variety of driving forces provoke
this change. Increasing telecommunications has “shrunk”
the world substantially. Increasing diversity of workers has brought
in a wide array of differing values, perspectives and expectations
among workers. Public consciousness has become much more sensitive
and demanding that organizations be more socially responsible.
Much of the third-world countries has joined the global marketplace,
creating a wider arena for sales and services. Organizations became
responsible not only to stockholders (those who owned stock) but
to a wider community of “stakeholders.”

As a result of the above driving forces,
organizations were required to adopt a “new paradigm,”
or view on the world, to be more sensitive, flexible and adaptable
to the demands and expectations of stakeholder demands. Many organizations
have abandoned or are abandoning the traditional top-down, rigid
and hierarchical structures to more “organic” and fluid
forms.

Today’s leaders and/or managers must
deal with continual, rapid change. Managers faced with a major
decision can no longer refer back to an earlier developed plan
for direction. Management techniques must continually notice changes
in the environment and organization, assess this change and manage
change. Managing change does not mean controlling it, rather understanding
it, adapting to it where necessary and guiding it when possible.

Managers can’t know it all or reference resources for every situation. Managers
must count on and listen more to their employees. Consequently, new forms of
organizations are becoming more common, e.g., worker-centered teams, self-organizing
and self-designing teams.

Traits of the New Paradigm

Marilyn Ferguson, in The New Paradigm: Emerging Strategic for
Leadership and Organizational Change
(Michael Ray and Alan
Rinzler, Eds., 1993, New Consciousness Reader), provides a very
concise overview of the differences between the old and new paradigm.
(The following is summarized.)

Old Paradigm

New Paradigm

promote consumption at all costs appropriate consumption
people to fit jobs jobs to fit people
imposed goals, top-down decision making autonomy encouraged, worker participation
fragmentation in work and roles cross-fertilization by specialists seeing wide relevance
identification with job identity transcends job description
clock model of company recognition of uncertainty
aggression, competition cooperation
work and play are separate blurring of work and play
manipulation and dominance cooperation with nature
struggle for stability sense of change, of becoming
quantitative qualitative as well as quantitative
strictly economic motives spiritual value transcends material gain
polarized transcends polarities
short-sighted ecologically sensitive
rational rational and intuitive
emphasis on short-term solutions recognition that long-range efficiency must take into account
harmonious work environment
centralized operations decentralized operations when possible
runaway, unbridled technology appropriate technology
allopathic treatment of symptoms attempt to understand the whole, locate deep underlying causes
of disharmony

This Article is in a Series About Understanding Organizational Structures and Design

This article is the seventh in the series which includes:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What
Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems

4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in
Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational
Culture

6. Legal Forms and Traditional
Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational
Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New
Organizational Structures and Design
9. Basic Guidelines for Organizational
Design
10. Wrap
Up: Grasping the Big Picture in Organizations (video)


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizations

In addition to the information on this current page, see the following blogs
which have posts related to organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see
various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the
blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Library’s
Consulting and Organizational Development Blog

Library’s
Leadership Blog

Library’s
Nonprofit Capacity Building Blog


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Related Library Topics

Recommended Books


How to Conduct a Basic Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis

Female employee raising hand for asking question at conference in office boardroom

How to Conduct a Basic Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

This Article is in a Series About Analyzing Organizations

This article is the eighth in the series which includes:

1. How to Conduct a Basic Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis

Sections of This Article Include

What is an Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis?

How is an Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis Done?


What is an Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis?

An organizational analysis is an evaluation of the quality of some or all of
the activities within an organization and preferrably the quality of feedback
exchanged with key stakeholders, as well. The style of the analysis ranges from
intuitive and spontaneous to planned and orderly depending on the reasons for
the analysis. There are several important reasons, including:

  1. To identify the causes of current and significant issues to soon resolve
    within the organization.
  2. As part of a strategic planning process in order to identify important internal
    priorities to address over the coming years.
  3. In preparation for an upcoming significant change, for example, a merger
    with another organization or a strategy to globalize the organization into
    other countries.
  4. In preparation for approaching funders and, thus, the need for presenting
    a forthright and credible analysis so the funder understands the true situation
    within the organization.

How the Analysis is Done — the Role of Diagnostic
Models

What is a Diagnostic Model?

An analysis could collect a vast range of information. However, unless there
is some framework around which to know what information to collect and how to
make judgments about that information, the analysis will likely become a very
overwhelming and confusing endeavor. This is where a diagnostic model is very
useful. A good diagnostic model will:

  1. Suggest some standard of performance about how a high-quality organization
    should be operating, including about the quality of its overall intended outcomes,
    practices within the organization and how those practices are integrated with
    each other.
  2. Suggest what types of information need to be collected in order to compare
    the current performance of the organization with the suggested standard of
    performance.
  3. Facilitate the comparison of the current performance of the organization
    to the preferred standard of performance in order to generate recommendations
    to improve the performance of the organization.

So How is an Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis Done?

Here are the typical phases of a well-planned organizational analysis.

  1. Clarify the reason and, thus, the focus of the analysis, for example, to
    resolve a certain major issue in the organization, such as recurring shortfalls
    of cash that threaten the sustainability of the organization.
  2. Select the best diagnostic model needed to assess the quality of the various
    best practices around ensuring sustainability, including of the finances.
    Numerous diagnostic models are listed at
  3. Reference the model in order to identify what types of information should
    be collected around those best practices.
  4. Select the best tools to collect the necessary information. Various criteria
    for screening tools are listed in the article How
    to Select from Among Public Data Collection Tools
    .
  5. Collect the necessary information, including to organize it into any categories
    suggested by the diagnostic model.
  6. Analyze the information in order to compare the current performance of the
    organization to the standard of performance suggested by the diagnostic model.
  7. Generate an analysis report that explains the major findings of the analysis
    and the recommendations regarding how to improve the organization’s practices
    around ensuring sustainability.

The manner in which those recommendations are implemented are out of the scope
of the activities in an organizational analysis and are more a matter of the
activities in guiding and supporting organizational change. See Guidelines,
Methods and Resources for Organizational Change Agents
.


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to New Forms of Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which
have posts related to New Forms of Organizations. Scan down the blog’s page
to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in
the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post
in the blog.

Library’s
Consulting and Organizational Development Blog

Library’s
Leadership Blog

Library’s
Nonprofit Capacity Building Blog

Also consider
Organizational Structures and Design
Materials Apply to Nonprofits and For-Profits


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Related Library Topics

Recommended Books


Basic Overview of Nonprofit Organizations

People in the Office

Basic Overview of Nonprofit Organizations

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.
Adapted from the Field Guide to Leadership and Supervision in Business
and Field Guide to Leadership and Supervision for Nonprofit Staff.

Applies to nonprofits unless otherwise noted.

Sections of This Topic Include

Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Nonprofit Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to Nonprofit Organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Also consider
Related Library Topics


Suggested Previous Reading

Note that the reader might best be served to first read the document Introduction to Organizations to understand the overall general nature of all organizations. As noted in that document, today’s leaders are faced with continual change in their organizations. Consequently, today’s leaders should have a strong sense of what their organizations are about. This document will accomplish that for nonprofit leaders.

An organization is a collection of resources arranged to accomplish an overall goal. The purpose of a nonprofit organization is to meet one or more needs in a community. Each nonprofit describes its overall purpose in a mission statement. (Very simply put, the word “nonprofit” means an organization that does not distribute a profit.)

Typical types of nonprofit services are advocacy, arts, civic, cultural, education, health and human service. Nonprofits range in size from extremely large (e.g., Red Cross, large hospitals, etc.) to extremely small (e.g., organizations that have no full-time personnel, and operate only with volunteers).

What is a “Nonprofit”?

Some Basics …

(by Carter McNamara)
Before you start your nonprofit, it’s helpful to realize that the phrase “starting a nonprofit” can mean many things. Read the following very basic information to begin thinking about what you mean when you set out to “start a nonprofit”.

– You can be a nonprofit organization just by getting together with some friends, eg, to form a self-help group. In this case, you’re an informal nonprofit organization.

– Consider incorporating your nonprofit so it exists as a separate legal organization in order to a) own its own property and its own bank account; b) ensure that the nonprofit can continue on its own (even after you’re gone); and c) protect yourself personally for operations of the nonprofit. You incorporate your nonprofit by filing articles of incorporation with the appropriate local state office. (An incorporated nonprofit requires a board of directors.)

– If you want to be exempt from federal taxes (and maybe some other taxes, too), you should file with the IRS to be a tax-exempt organization. (The IRS states that you must be a corporation, community chest, fund, or foundation to receive tax-exempt status. Articles of association may also be used in place of incorporation.) (Probably the most well known type of nonprofits is a the IRS classification of 501(c)(3), a “charitable nonprofit’.)

– Depending on the nature of your organization, you may also granted tax-deductible status from the IRS. Publication 526 lists the types of organizations to which donations are deductible.

– So, if you did all of these steps, you’d be an incorporated, tax-exempt nonprofit that could receive tax deductible donations.

– The particular steps you take depend on your plans for your organization, including the nature of its services. They also depend on how the IRS interprets the nature of your organization, including its services.

And Now Some Refinement on the Description of “Nonprofit”

(by Putnam Barber)
(Items in brackets “[!]” are added by Carter McNamara.)

The word “nonprofit” refers to a type of business — one which is organized under rules that forbid the distribution of profits to owners. “Profit” in this context is a relatively technical accounting term, related to but not identical with the notion of a surplus of revenues over expenditures.

Most [registered!] nonprofits businesses are organized into corporations [or associations!]. Most corporations are formed under the corporations laws of a particular state. Every state has provisions for forming nonprofit corporations; some permit other forms, such as unincorporated associations, trusts, etc., which may operate as nonprofit businesses on slightly (but sometimes importantly) different terms.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) gets involved because corporations are, in general, required to pay federal corporate income taxes on their net earning (another technical term, pointing to a slightly different way to the idea of a surplus of revenue over expenses).

Section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code lists several circumstances under which corporations [or unincorporated nonprofits!] are exempt from these taxes. Section 501(c)(3) — the famous one — describes
[nonprofit!] (1) serving charitable, religious, scientific or educational purposes (2) no part of the income of which “inures to the benefit of” anyone.

Tax-exempt nonprofit organizations can, and do, operate in all other particulars like any other sort of business. They have bank accounts; own productive assets of all kinds; receive income from sales and other forms of activity, including donations and grants if they are successful at finding that sort of support; make and hold passive investments; employ staff; enter into contracts of all sorts; etc.

There are some specialized tax rules and accounting practices that apply to nonprofit organizations. If they are of a certain size, they are required to disclose many details of their operations to the general public and to state regulators and watchdog agencies using IRS form 990. This form shows any salaries paid to officers or directors [for incorporated nonprofits!] and to the five highest-paid employees and contracts if any receive over $50,000 in the tax year.

The form also requires the organization to divide its expenses into “functional categories” — program, administration and fund-raising — and report the totals for each along with the amounts expended on each program activity.

Nonprofit organizations file for tax-exemption by using IRS Publication 557, “Tax-Exempt Status for Your Organization“.

To view various kinds of tax-exempt (Section 501) organizations, see IRS Tax-Exempt Organization Reference Chart

Key Roles

(by Carter McNamara)
· Clients – Everything in a nonprofit is ultimately directed to serving clients. Clients are the “consumers” or “customers” of the nonprofit’s services. Note that services can be in the form of tangible or intangible products.

· Board – The board is comprised of individuals from the community and, ideally, is representative of the organizations clients. Law and theory dictate that the board is in charge, and directly accountable for the overall direction and policies of the organization. Powers are given to the board by the Articles of Incorporation (or other governing document, for example, Articles of Association, Constitution, etc.).

The board can configure the nonprofit in whatever structure it prefers to meet the organization’s mission and usually does so via specifications in bylaws. Members of nonprofit boards are generally motivated by a desire to serve the community and the personal satisfaction of volunteering. Nonprofit board members may not receive monetary compensation for serving on the board.

See the library topic Boards for description of the overall responsibilities of a board, key board roles, how meetings are carried out, etc.

· Board Chair – A board chair’s role is central to coordinating the work of the board, executive director and committees. The chair’s role may have appointive power for committees, depending on what is specified about this role in the bylaws. The power of the board chair is usually through persuasion and general leadership. See the topic Board Chair for an overview of the board chair role.

· Committees – Typically, the board chooses to carry out its operations using a variety of board committees. The topic Description of Typical Committees for a description of typical board committees.

· Executive Director – The board typically chooses to have this one person who is ultimately responsible
to carry out the wishes of the board. The executive director is directly accountable for the work of the staff and supports the work of the board committees. For more information, see the library topic Chief Executive Role.

· Staff – Staff report to the executive director and may support the work of the committees.

· Volunteers – Volunteers are unpaid personnel who assist staff, serve on committees and generally work under the direction of the executive director. See the topic Volunteer Programs for an understanding of the role of volunteers.

Three Major Aspects of Nonprofit Structure

(by Carter McNamara)
Typically, the nonprofit operations are organized into major functions. These functions usually include central administration and programs.

· Governance – The governance function of a nonprofit is responsible to provide overall strategic direction, guidance and controls. Often the term “governance” refers to board matters. However, many people are coming to consider governance as a function carried out by the board and top management. Effective of governance depends to a great extent on the working relationship between board and top management.
· Programs – Typically, nonprofits work from their overall mission, or purpose, to identify a few basic service goals which must be reached to accomplish their mission. Resources are organized into programs to reach each goal. It often helps to think of programs in terms of inputs, process, outputs and outcomes. Inputs are the various resources needed to run the program, e.g., money, facilities, clients, program staff, etc.

The process is how the program is carried out, e.g., clients are counseled, children are cared for, art is created, association members are supported, etc. The outputs are the units of service, e.g., number of clients counseled, children cared for, artistic pieces produced, or members in the association. Outcomes are the impacts on the clients receiving services, e.g., increased mental health, safe and secure development, richer artistic appreciation and perspectives in life, increased effectiveness among members, etc.

· Central administration – Central administration is the staff and facilities that are common to running all programs. This usually includes at least the executive director and office personnel. Nonprofits usually strive to keep costs of central administration low in proportion to costs to run programs.

Management Skills Generally Unique to Nonprofits

The following link provides a wide list of areas of knowledge and skills needed in management activities. The link also lists skills that are somewhat unique to nonprofit management. The nonprofit-unique skills are also listed below.
Areas of Knowledge and Skills Needed in Management
What is Management? How Do I Manage?

Areas of Knowledge and Skills that are Generally Unique to Nonprofits

How to Manage Nonprofit-Specific Activities

Current Major Challenge: Devolution

(by Keri Poeppe)
“Devolution” is a word used a great deal these days among nonprofit funders and leaders. Essentially devolution is the short-hand word for a strong trend of cutbacks in federal funding to nonprofits (especially for programs such as welfare (AFDC and certain SSI programs) and the resulting changes in responsibility for administering such programs. Legislation passed by the Congress reduces (and in some cases) eliminates a federal commitment to automatically provide assistance to the poor.

Instead, blocks of funds (usually in reduced levels) will be passed through to states, allowing them to decide who will receive aid and who will not. Thus, devolution is associated with the end of what is often called “entitlements” to services previously guaranteed by the federal government.

While devolution provides opportunity for more local control and possibly less bureaucratic waste, human services programs will be at great risk due to reduced federal (and therefore state) funding. Nonprofits (which, on average, receive approximately 30 percent of their revenues from federal sources) will suffer significant loss of funds which may be very difficult to replace. Meanwhile, public demand for human services continues to increase.

Devolution brings many challenges to nonprofit leaders. They must operate more effectively in the face of reduced funding. They must consider substantial changes in the way they have operated. Concepts such as strategic alliances and restructuring will become commonplace.

Revenue: Fees and Fundraising

(by Keri Poeppe)

Fees

Fees may be associated with these services and billed to either the person receiving the service (e.g. the parent with a child in daycare) or to a third party such as a government agency that supports such services. Unlike the private sector where the price of a product or service must cover all costs, nonprofit agencies rarely meet all their costs based upon sales and fees. Instead nonprofits must engage in fundraising and seek additional revenue sources.

It is important to note that while many nonprofits provide services that are valuable to our community, it is often difficult to measure the actual results of their services. Changes in an individual’s or a community’s behavior may take years to be realized. Nonetheless, nonprofits are challenged to demonstrate results as donors become more savvy and funding sources become increasingly limited.

Fundraising

As noted above, nonprofit managers (and the board of directors) must engage in fundraising in order to meet the fiscal needs of their organization. Generally, fundraising is not one of an executive director’s favorite tasks. It can be an all-consuming activity, tapping an executive director’s creative and social energy.

Executive directors are constantly challenged to strike a balance between the time they devote to fundraising and program management. Too little attention to one area can leave an organization bereft of cash or quality services.

There are several basic sources of funding in the nonprofit sector. The first is a grant. Grants may be given by government agencies, foundations or corporations, usually to operate a specific program. As noted earlier, agencies receiving government grants to operate human service programs base their reimbursement on fees for the services. Grants from foundations or corporations are generally provided up front and require a report on program activities and expenditures at the end of the grant period.

Nonprofit organizations will solicit individuals for funds, also. Individual donations may come from an organization’s membership or constituents (e.g. viewers of public television or residents of a neighborhood community). These are generally small donations, ideally from a large number of people. Sizable gifts may come from individuals who are referred to as major donors. Cultivating relationships with major donors requires the energy and resourcefulness of the board and director. Many nonprofits will hold special events to raise dollars. These vary from bake sales to major events.

Fundraising can be a full-time job (or a full-time obsession) for nonprofit executive directors. Executive Directors are challenged to balance their time between raising money and program management. If too much time is spent on fundraising, programs and staff may not get the direction and coaching they need. On the other hand, if fundraising takes a back seat to program management, the organization’s cash flow will suffer.

Two factors will enhance fundraising efforts. One is good programs. Programs that are meeting important community needs and demonstrating results will sell themselves. A board that is committed to its fundraising responsibilities will also be an asset to the organization. Board members who take their role in fundraising very seriously will promote the organization and help bring resources to it.

It is important to note, however, how the political climate can affect an organization’s fundraising. Foundations and corporations may choose specific issues or causes for priority in grantmaking. In the 1980’s organizations working with the elderly received major support from foundations and the government. These same organizations saw their support decrease as youth issues became a major focus in the 1990’s.

Unique Nature and Struggles of Traditional Small Nonprofits

(by Sandra Larson)

The Heart of the Matter: Leadership and Management

At the heart of any successful nonprofit is an effective chief executive and board of directors. These leaders must work as a team with vision, skill, and sufficient resources to accomplish the organization’s mission. While leadership is shared, critical management skills must rest with the chief executive. However, the board must be sufficiently skilled in management to assess the work of this director and assist in strategic decision making.

Values as the Bottom Line

Values are the driving force in a nonprofit. The bottom line is the realization of a social mission, not profits. This poses complex problems for the leadership team. How are programs agreed upon, progress monitored, and success measured? How are priorities set and consensus reached? How are staff rewarded and what control systems are applicable? Skilled consultants may be needed from time to time to assist the team in answering these qualitative, value-laden questions and focus on appropriate management systems.

Nonprofit Personnel are Often Highly Diverse

Diversity is reflected, not only by different races and ethnic groups, but ultimately by different values and perspectives. This strong diversity is a major benefit to the nonprofit because input from a wide variety of perspectives usually ensures complete consideration of situations and new ideas. However, nonprofit personnel must ensure they cultivate and remain open to the various values and perspectives.

Problems are Especially Complex for the Small Nonprofit

The majority of nonprofits have small staffs and small budgets, e.g., less than $500,000, which compounds the leadership and management problems they face, especially given their charters and the magnitude
of community needs with which they deal. Those new to nonprofits may react that, because nonprofits tend to be small in size, issues in nonprofits should be simple in nature. On the contrary, the vast majority of organizations (regardless of size) experience similar issues, e.g., challenges in planning, organizing, motivating and guiding. However, when these issues are focused in a small organization, the nature of the organization becomes very dynamic and complex.

Sufficient Resources to Pay Leadership May Be Lacking

With lack of sufficient moneys, attracting and retaining paid management also can be problematic. Hard work with little career development opportunity encourages turnover of chief executives and staff. This can stall the organization’s work. Expertise that is brought in to advise the management may be lost once that leadership leaves.

Lack of Managerial Training is Problematic for the Small Nonprofit

Many nonprofit managers have been promoted primarily out of non-management disciplines and do not have the managerial skills that are needed to run a nonprofit organization. Training and consultation can do much to help these new leaders/managers gain the skills they seek and help them up a myriad of learning curves that rainbow out in front of them.

Chief Executives Wear Too Many Hats

A nonprofit chief executive has to be a current expert in planning, marketing, information management, telecommunications, property management, personnel, finance, systems design, fundraising and
program evaluation. Obviously this is not possible, regardless of size. A larger organization may be able to hire some internal experts, but this is certainly not the case for the smaller organization.

Furthermore, the technology of management progresses today too rapidly for the non-specialist to keep abreast of new thinking and expertise, whatever the size. Outside expertise therefore is often a must for both the large and small organization.

Too Small to Justify or Pay for Expensive Outside Advice

Most nonprofits, even larger ones, often hesitate to spend money on administrative “overhead” such as consultants or other outside experts because this is seen as diverting valuable dollars from direct service. Of course, most nonprofits have no choice. They don’t have enough money to even consider hiring consultants at for-profit rates. Low-cost, volunteer-based assistance often is an appropriate solution.

One-shot Assistance Often is Not Enough

While most consultant organizations want to teach managers “how to fish” rather than give them a “fish,” “fishing” (management skills) is not something that often can be learned in one consultation. Especially in more technical arenas such as computerization, learning comes while grappling with an issue or management problem over a period of time. Building internal management capacity takes more time than a one-shot consultation. Repeat help therefore is not a sign of failure but of growth — a new need to know has surfaced.

Networks are Lacking

Everyone outside the nonprofit sector observes, “Why don’t those chief executives get together more, share more ideas, undertake cooperative ventures?” There are many reasons. First of all, running a successful organization (delivering the quality service that fulfills the organization’s mission) isn’t enough.

Most nonprofit directors run a second business — raising money to support the first. Both are complex and very time-consuming activities, especially when the director wears all the management hats. Second, developing networks or researching joint ventures is time-consuming, expensive and risky.

Nonprofits Usually Have Little Time and Money

Funders do not seem to think research and development activity justifies new expenditures; at least many are hesitant to fund what might not succeed. While nonprofits may be more entrepreneurial than funders, they have little capital to risk. Collaborative planning will be enhanced by computerization and telecommunications, but these investments also are difficult to fund.

In some ways, affordable consultants can substitute for expensive, up-front research and development costs, at least at the feasibility level. In many cases, they can carry an organization through the needed planning to actually develop a new system of collaboration, merger, or automation.

Nonprofits Need Low-Cost Management and Technical Assistance

Nonprofits are valuable community assets that must be effectively managed. The need to provide affordable, accessible management and technical assistance to nonprofit organizations is clear for all the reasons stated above: the complexity of the task, the lack of board and internal expertise, the lack of time and money, changing needs, the learning curve, and, finally the importance of the results to the community. What is well done is based on what is well run.

Typical Nature of Planning in Nonprofits

For most nonprofits, they don’t have a lot of time, money, or resources for sophisticated, comprehensive strategic planning. The focus is usually on the major issues facing the nonprofit and quickly addressing them. Typical major challenges for the facilitator are basic training of personnel about planning concepts and process, helping the nonprofit to focus and sustain its limited resources on planning, ensuring strategies are really strategic rather than operational/efficiency measures, and helping design small and focused planning meetings that produce realistic plans that become implemented.

General Resources


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design

People in the Office

Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Sections of This Article Include


Characteristics of the New Nature of Organizations

New forms of organizations are geared to make organizations more receptive, adaptive and generative — always focused on meeting the needs of stakeholders. New forms of organizations often exhibit the following characteristics:

1. Strong employee involvement
– input to the system starts from those closest to the outcome preferred by the system, from those most in-the-know about whether the organization is achieving its preferred outcomes with its stakeholders or not. This way, the organization stays highly attuned and adaptive to the needs of stakeholders.

2. Organic in nature
– less rules and regulations, sometimes no clear boundaries and always-changing forms

3. Authority based on capability
– ensures the organization remains a means to an end and not an end in itself

4. Alliances -takes advantage of economies of scale, e.g., collaborations, networks, strategic alliances/mergers, etc.

5. Teams – shares activities to take advantage of economies of scale at the lowest levels of activities and ensures full involvement of employees at the lowest levels

6. Flatter, decentralized organizations
– less middle management, resulting in top management exchanging more feedback with those providing products and services; also results in less overhead costs

7. Mindfulness of environments, changes, patterns and themes – priority on reflection and inquiry to learn from experience; develop “learning organizations”

New Organizational Structures and Design

Network Structure

This modern structure includes the linking of numerous, separate organizations to optimize their interaction in order to accomplish a common, overall goal. An example is a joint venture to build a complex, technical systems such as the space shuttle. Another example is a network of construction companies to build a large structure.

Virtual Organization

This emerging form is based on organization members interacting with each other completely, or almost completely, via telecommunications. Members may never actually meet each other. See Virtual Teams

Self-Managed Teams

These teams usually include from 5-15 people and are geared to produce a product or service. Members provide a range of the skills needed to produce the product. The team is granted sufficient authority and access to resources to produce their product in a timely fashion. The hallmark of a self-managed team is that members indeed manage their own group, i.e., they manage access to resources, scheduling, supervision, etc. Team members develop their own process for identifying and rotating members in managerial roles. Often, authority at any given time rests with whomever has the most expertise about the current activity or task in the overall project. Often members are trained in various problem-solving techniques and team-building techniques. These teams work best in environments where the technologies to deliver the product or service are highly complex and the marketplace and organization environments are continually changing. Self-managed teams pose a unique challenge for the traditional manager. It can be extremely difficult for him or her to support empowerment of the self-managed team, taking the risk of letting go of his or her own control.

Learning Organizations

In an environment where environments are continually changing, it’s critical that organizations detect and quickly correct its own errors. This requires continuous feedback to, and within, the organization. Continual feedback allows the organization to `unlearn’ old beliefs and remain open to new feedback, uncolored by long-held beliefs.

In a learning organization, managers don’t direct as much as they facilitate the workers’ applying new information and learning from that experience. Managers ensure time to exchange feedback, to inquire and reflect about the feedback, and then to gain consensus on direction. Peter Senge, noted systems theorist, points out in his book, The Fifth Discipline (Doubleday, 1990, p. 14), that the learning organization is “continually expanding its capacity to create its future … for a learning organization, `adaptive learning’ must be joined by `generative learning,’ learning that enhances our capacity to create.”

Self-Organizing Systems

Self-organizing systems have the ability to continually change their structure and internal processes to conform to feedback with the environment. Some writers use the analogy of biological systems as self-organizing systems. Their ultimate purpose is to stay alive and duplicate. They exist in increasing complexity and adapt their structures and forms to accommodate this complexity. Ultimately, they change structure dramatically to adjust to the outer environment. (Some assert that self-managed groups are self-organizing systems, although others assert that self-managed groups are not because an ultimate purpose is assigned to team members).

A self-organizing system requires a strong current goal or purpose. It requires continual feedback with its surrounding environment. It requires continual reference to a common set of values and dialoguing around these values. It requires continued and shared reflection around the system’s current processes. The manager of this type of organization requires high value on communication and a great deal of patience — and the ability to focus on outcomes rather than outputs. Focus is more on learning than on method.

This Article is in a Series About Understanding Organizational Structures and Design

This article is the eighth in the series which includes:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems
4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational Culture
6. Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design
9. Basic Guidelines for Organizational Design
10. Wrap Up: Grasping the Big Picture in Organizations (video)


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to New Forms of Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to New Forms of Organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Also consider


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Various Ways to Look at Organizations (Metaphors)

People in a Meeting Sharing Ideas

Various Ways to Look at Organizations (Metaphors)

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Probably everyone in the workplace has their own conception
of what “organization” means. As with most highly complex
terms, everyone is right and everyone is wrong.

The concept of organizational culture
is much like an organizational “personality”. Organizations,
like people, have life cycles.

Many people view organizational
learning
much like we view organisms to be learning. Organizations
can accumulate and manage
knowledge
as well. There are a variety of books that describe
other traits of organizations much like traits of people, e.g.,
depressed organizations, addictive organizations, etc.

One of the most common ways to look at organizations is as
organizational systems. (This is the
view that was used in this library when describing the concept
of an organization.) This view is becoming common among professionals
who study, teach and write about organizations. Practitioners
who work with organizational management to improve organizations
also tend to view organizations as systems. Note that machines,
organisms, persons, groups, families, family dynasties are all
systems, too.

Two people can be looking at the very same organization, but
have completely different perspectives and language about the
same organization. Unless you know the various ways to view organizations,
you’ll miss all the perspectives — you’ll miss the more accurate
truth about the organization you’re studying. You’ll only see
“one view of the elephant — you’ll grab the elephant’s trunk
and think it’s a snake.”
Organizational
Lens — How Different People Can View the Same Organization Very
Differently


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Related Library Topics

Recommended Books


Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations

Business women shaking hands in a meeting

Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations

Much of the content of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Sections of This Article Include


What Are Organizational Life Cycles?

Simply put, organizations are social systems. They’re groups of people organized around a common purpose. Their activities include similar recurring practices, for example, strategic planning, business planning, product and service development, marketing, financial management and evaluations. Each activity usually includes formally or informally clarifying goals, taking steps toward those goals, deciding if the goals are being met or not, and adjusting activities to be even more effective and efficient in reaching the goals. The social systems can be focused primarily on the entire organization, teams, each product or service, or within a certain activity. Individuals themselves are systems, needing a clear purpose and activities to continually work toward that purpose.

Social systems go through common life-cycles ranging from, for example, from start-up to growth to maturity. For example, as people mature, they begin to understand more about the world and themselves. Over time, they develop a certain kind of wisdom that sees them through many of the challenges in life and work. They learn to plan and to use a certain amount of discipline to carry through on those plans. They learn to manage themselves. Meanwhile, they go through infancy, child-hood and early-teenage phases that are characterized by lots of rapid growth. People in these phases often do whatever it takes just to stay alive, for example, eating, seeking shelter and sleeping. Early on, many people tend to make impulsive, highly reactive decisions based on whatever is going on around them at the moment.

Why Are They Important to Understand?

Start-up organizations, team and internal practices are like this, too. Often, founders of the organization or program and its various members have to do whatever is necessary just to stay in business. Leaders make highly reactive, seat-of-the-pants decisions. They fear taking the time to slow down and do planning.

Experienced leaders have learned to recognize the particular life cycle that a system is going through. These leaders understand the types of problems faced during each life cycle. That understanding gives them a sense of perspective and helps them to decide how to respond to decisions and problems in the workplace and their lives and the workplace.

That understanding also suggests the priories that they need to soon address in order to evolve to the next stage. Systems that do not evolve often stagnate or decline between stages. Symptoms can be unclear priorities, unclear roles, increasing frustrations and conflict, and people leaving the organization. If the understanding of the life cycle is not known, then these problems are often not resolved.

When discerning the particular stage that a system is currently in, it does not depend on the age of the system. Rather, it depends on the nature of its current activities. For example, if the activities are mostly unplanned, high reactive and decisions are made primarily by certain personalities rather than by plans and policies, then that organization is operating more like an early stage organization.

Example of a Simple Organizational Life Cycle Model

Life cycles of social systems are so important to understand that there has been an increasing number of suggested frameworks and models for life cycles. Here is one simple model to further enhance your understanding of life cycles. In this example, the focus is on an organization-wide social system.

Some systems planners consider there to be an additional stage of decline that is after the maturity stage. That stage recognizes that not all systems are meant to exist forever. It also helps systems planners to avoid desperately staying in the maturity stage, lest the system “fails”.

Start-Up Features

  • Has compelling, exciting vision and purpose
  • People are motivated by exciting, charismatic leaders
  • Board is usually a hands-on (working) Board
  • People are recruited because they’re excited and want to chip in
  • People chip in wherever they feel they’re needed
  • Decisions are often reactive and spontaneous. Plans, if developed at all, are often not implemented
  • Resources (money, facilities, etc.) are continually sought, sometimes in crisis situations
  • Occasional confusion, frustration and conflicts can exist about who’s doing what, how and when
  • People begin to talk about the need for more planning and procedures
  • If there’s strong resistance to change, then crises increase, for example, cash shortages, conflicts and people leaving

Priorities in Growth Stage

  • Focus is on strengthening internal systems to support growth, while expanding services and markets
  • Leaders focus on managing change as much as on generating new ideas
  • Board evolves to more of a policy-Board with continued focus on plans, policies and full participation
  • Different departments and teams are appropriately coordinated for efficiencies
  • Planning is regular and systematic, and focused on goals, roles and deadlines
  • Progress is regularly monitored for status, learning and continuous improvement
  • Regular and routine activities are proceduralized for reliability and efficiencies
  • Internal systems are developed to systematically obtain resources, based on plans
  • Performance management practices are focused on personnel and the organization

Priorities in Maturity Stage

  • Focus in on sustaining momentum and renewal, especially to avoid entrenching in bureaucracy
  • Focus is also on creativity and innovation – sometimes to start new ventures, that start new life cycles themselves
  • Management priorities are especially on succession planning and risk management
  • More learning is shared with other people and organizations
  • Leaders seek to successfully duplicate their business model elsewhere
  • People attend to even longer-range planning, for example, 3-5 years out
  • Priority continues to be on managing change and transformation
  • Some organizations consider terminating the organization if its vision is achieved

Product Life Cycles

The recurring activities to plan, develop, implement, evaluate and then adjust the plans for each product and service is a essentially a systematic recurring set of activities. It is a system and has a life cycle like many other systems. The phases in the system might be described by the above simple diagram of phases.

Experienced product managers understand the stages of development of a typical product or service, and know what the typical traits of each stage are. Thus, they know what priorities to address to evolve the product or service to maturity. They understand that problems that can occur if the next stage is not reached. Consider the following articles.

Additional Perspectives on Life Cycles

Also consider

This Article is in a Series About Understanding Organizational Structures and Design

This article is the fourth in the series which includes:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems
4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational Culture
6. Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design
9. Basic Guidelines for Organizational Design
10. Wrap Up: Grasping the Big Picture in Organizations (video)


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizations

In addition to the information on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Related Library Topics


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Understanding Organizational Structures and Design: What They Are and How They Work

Lady standing close to a while board in a meeting

Understanding Organizational Structures and Design: What They Are and How They Work

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Strongly Suggested Pre-Reading

Organizational Performance Management


Description

Be sure to read the description in Organizational Performance Management to understand that organizational structures are ultimately strategies to help increase the performance of the organization.

To successfully decide the best structures for your organization — or to improve the health of an already established organization — you need some basic understanding of organizational design. You should know what an organization really is, including its parts and how they all work together. Too often, this information is not understood. As a result, leaders and managers add or modify activities within their organizations and without meaning to, they adversely affect the other activities.

You should understand the parts that are the same across all types of organizations — and the parts that are highly unique between them. Otherwise, you might miss out on the vast free resources for assistance to you because you believe your organization and its problems are truly unique.

You should know how to recognize the typical features of a new and start-up organization (in its first life stage) as compared to a well established one (in its mature life stage). Without knowing that information, you can have unrealistic expectations of your start-up organization, resulting in increasing confusion,
frustration and conflicts. You won’t know what is needed to evolve to the next level.

You should be able to recognize the differences in cultures between organizations. Otherwise, you will not understand why other people have such different values and expectations than yours — and that theirs is not wrong.

You also should know about how organizations are changing significantly because of numerous driving forces today. These changes are also causing changes in the nature of the leadership and management within them. Those coming changes are likely to affect you.

This purpose of this series of articles is to convey the core concepts in all of that information to you. You should proceed through the series by going through the articles in the following order.

(Those who naturally prefer to focus on the “business side” in organizations, rather than the “human skills” side, might particularly appreciate this topic on organizational structures.)

Various (and Sometimes Contrary) Perspectives

Go Through This Series in This Order

This article is the first in the series which includes:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems

4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational Culture
6. Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design
9. Basic Guidelines for Organizational Design
10. Wrap Up: Grasping the Big Picture in Organizations (video)


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizational Theory

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to Organizational Theories. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Also consider


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Basic Dimensions in Organizations

Top View Photo of People Handshaking

Common Dimensions in Organizations

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

When we think about a house, we usually take certain features into consideration, e.g., how many rooms it has, the color of its walls, slope of its roof, etc. A person can consider the following dimensions when analyzing an organization.

Sections of This Topic Include

Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Dimensions of Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to Dimensions of Organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Also consider
Related Library Topics


Richard Daft in his book, Organizational Theory and Design (West Publishing, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1992), organizes these dimensions into categories of structural and contextual.

Structural dimensions:

Centralization
– the extent to which functions are dispersed in the organization, either in terms of integration with other functions or geographically

Formalization
– regarding the extent of policies and procedures in the organization

Hierarchy

– regarding the extent and configuration of levels in the structure

Routinization

– regarding the extent that organizational processes are standardized

Specialization

– regarding the extent to which activities are refined

Training

– regrading the extent of activities to equip organization members with knowledge and skills to carry out their roles

Contextual Dimensions

Culture
– the values and beliefs shared by all (note that culture is often discerned by examining norms or observable behaviors in the workplace)

Environment
– the nature of external influences and activities in the political, technical, social and economic arenas

Goals

– unique overall priorities and desired end-states of the organization

Size

– number of people and resources and their span in the organization

Technology

the often unique activities needed to reach organizational goals, including nature of activities, specialization, type of equipment/facilities needed, etc.


Additional Perspectives on Dimensions of Organizations


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


How to Design Your Organization

Woman Holding Portable Pad in a Group Meeting

How to Design Your Organization’s Structures

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

Assembled by Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD

Suggested Pre-Readings

Information about organizational design will have more context and meaning
if you have read the following articles and in this order:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems
4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational Culture
6. Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design

Sections in This Topic Include


General Principles of Organizational Design

The section after this one shares practical advice about designing the structure of your organization. However, it might be interesting first to read about the general principles that the practical advice is following.

© Copyright Jim Smith

Some years ago Albert Cherns, an important figure in the Norwegian work redesign efforts highlighted some important Principles of Social and Technical Systems Design. The Principles of Organization Design have been known for 30 years in the academic and consulting community. Knowing the principles and implementing them are clearly two different things. First, I will detail the principles and following that I will highlight what has made the implementation so difficult.

1. Complementarities

How we go about restructuring needs to be compatible with what we are trying to achieve by the restructuring. The process of design must be complementary with the objectives. This means the design and implementation process is critical. If you want flexibility and participation within the work group as an output of the design, then how you go about designing the organization has to be flexible, interactive and participatory.

If the completed work system will depend upon high levels of meaningful flexibility in accomplishing the work, then it is through a process of meaningful flexibility that the system needs to be built. The “means” have to be complimentary with the “ends”. In other words, if you want a system where people assume responsibility, then people have to be responsibly involved in creating the work system or you won’t get it. We do not get participative highly effective organizations by fiat.

2. Minimal Critical Specification

New technologies require people to learn and change. These abilities have to be developed through the work itself. Therefore, specify as little as possible concerning how tasks combine into jobs and how people are to interact within jobs. The creation of a well-designed work team must involve dialogue and decisions being made by the people involved. Most teams struggle from over-structure, which is based in job descriptions and compensation schemes, which result in “that’s not my job”. The trick in building a team that works is to specify no more than is absolutely necessary about the task or how jobs relate to the task, or how people relate to individual jobs. To build a high performance team the rule is to FIX as little as possible. This means to identify and specify no more than what is absolutely critical. Generally the critical information is about output expected. The vision of results is very important and has to be co-constructed with the group but more than anything you want to build an organic ability to learn and change into the team.

3. Variance Control

Support and reward groups that deal with errors at the point of origin. Effective teams need the legitimacy to find out where things go wrong and deal with variance where it occurs. The goal is to minimize exporting problems to others. The assumption that is safe to make is that people know what good work looks like. Exporting problems and unsatisfied customer needs is the mark of a team that lacks options.

4. Clear Goals and Flexible Strategies

Define what is expected in terms of performance early and clearly and then support adaptations toward appropriate means by which the group can achieve ends. (Do not over-specify.) This is an adaptability principle, which recognizes that we are designing living systems rather than machines. With living systems, the same ends can be reached by different means. There are a lot of ways to solve problems and meet a customers needs.

What is critical here is the definition and understanding of the end goal. The “What” is to be highly specified. The “How” is open to local decision and initiative. This enables learning and an increased sense of “efficacy” on the part of team members. Efficacy is the sense that we are effective as a team that we can make a difference and do the job well. Efficacy is fragile and needs to be supported by continuous learning and improvement. High performance teams constantly “tinker” with the means by which they accomplish their results. They seldom settle on “one best way”

5. Boundary Location and Control

Supervisors and managers have to grow to become more comfortable performing a role as a group resource, a beacon of coming changes and a coordinator across task group boundaries.

Traditional organizations group by: time, technology or territory. The weakness of this is that boundaries interfere with the desirable sharing of knowledge and experience and so learning suffers. The consistent social-technical message is if there are supervisors, they manage the boundaries as a group resource, insuring the group has adequate resources, coordinating activities with other groups and foreseeing coming changes. More and more these resource positions are disappearing as groups become more self-regulating. Often the presence of supervisors is an indication of a lack of success in a groups design, or unwillingness at higher levels to trust based upon a poor job of building the structure. When it is done right supervisors are superfluous at best and harmful at worse.

6. Information Flow

Teams have to be deeply involved to determine what and where information is needed for self-direction. There needs to be a management commitment to provide information for task performance and learning. Information has to be provided where it is needed for self-direction, learning, and task improvement. Control has to be subordinated to achievement.

7. Support Congruence

Goals, reward and support systems that integrate required behaviors have to be consistent. The reward and support systems have to be consistent with goals. Incentives have to be realigned to support team-based work structures. Individual based compensation systems are being modified continually to support many different team structures. Skill-based schemes and gain sharing are foundations for high performance.

8. Design and Human Values

Task and organization design has to be oriented toward improving both the technical and the human components of the organization. The process of design must address the need for variation and meaning in work. It has to take into account the needs for continuous learning, involvement in decision-making, help and support between colleagues, and meaningful relationship between work and outside society, a desirable future. A re-design enterprise will be successful only if it unites a process of organization development, which includes work restructuring combined with a planning process that is both interactive and participatory.

9. Incompletion

Design is a continuous commitment, a reiterative process. A design is a solution, which inevitably has to be changed, therefore it is critical to build learning and change ability into the team. Management has to appreciate that organization design toward high performance is a continuous process. What has to be learned is the process of design because it is a never-ending necessity. Deep in our organizations, people have to learn how to periodically re-fashion their organizational arrangements. Everything falls out of balance and has to be reviewed with an eye toward deciding upon changes necessary. In the early stages learning how to redesign is often more important than the design itself. The design will change over time and learning how to do it is a team life skill.

The basic message is that if you want people to assume responsibility for the work process you have to involve them in the work redesign process itself. Responsibility is the essence of self-management. To accept responsibility people have to define and make decisions. The tendency is for management to hand the operational people an output of redesign thinking done by others, and expect them to work it. Expecting also, the supervisors to supervise the implementation of a design which management has completed. The trick of organizing for real teamwork is getting everyone involved in the total systems improvement.

Practical Advice About Organizing or Reorganizing an Organization and Its Employees

The following article shares advice about preparing for organizing and re-organizing, and then the practical advice to doing any of that.
Organizing or Reorganizing an Organization and Its Employees .

Also see
Organizing (how to arrange resources in organizations so people can work well together)

Additional Guidelines for Organizational Design

Developing Organization Charts

Organization charts (or “org charts” as they affectionately are known) are graphical depictions of the official roles/positions in the organization and their relationship to each other, e.g., the top position and authority in the organization and then what other positions formally report to which other positions throughout the organization. Org charts are very common, especially in organizations with 5 or more people. The following guidelines will help you to understand org charts and how to develop them for your own organization.

This Article is in a Series About Understanding Organizational Structures and Design

This article is the ninth in the series which includes:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems
4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational Culture
6. Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design
9. Basic Guidelines for Organizational Design
10. Wrap Up: Grasping the Big Picture in Organizations (video)


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.