There are strong feelings that consulting, facilitating, coaching and training are very different roles. I believe that a good consultant should be able to use any of the roles for different purposes. Here are some guidelines for what roles to use and when.
When You Might Resort to Facilitating
Collaborative organizational consulting is about working, as much as possible, in partnership with your clients to accomplish powerful, long-lasting change in your client’s organization. That usually requires a highly facilitative role in your consulting. Facilitating is helping a group of people to decide what results they want to achieve together, how they want to achieve them and then helping the group to achieve them. Styles range from directive to indirectly suggestive. The conditions that often exist in an organizational project and require the consultant to fill the facilitator role include:
- When the project needs ongoing trust, commitment and participation of clients.
Ongoing contributions usually do not come from clients during trainings or when receiving advice from experts. Instead, the buy-in of members comes from knowing that their beliefs and opinions are being solicited and valued. This can be especially important when a diverse group will be involved or impacted by the project. The essence of facilitation is to bring out those beliefs and opinions and to help members decide what they want to do and how they want to do it. - When working to address complex problems or major goals with clients.
The most accurate understanding of priorities in an organization often comes from considering the perspectives of as many members as possible. The most relevant, realistic and flexible strategies to address those priorities are developed and implemented from the active participation of members. Facilitation is the most powerful role from which to cultivate that participation.
When You Might Resort to Coaching
You might choose to fill the coaching role when the following conditions exist.
- An individual in the project seems stalled or troubled.
Coaching can be a powerful means to guide and support an individual to clarify current challenges or priorities, identify suitable strategies to address the challenges and then to actually implement the strategies. - To maximize an individual’s learning from experience.
Individuals learn differently. Coaching can be a powerful means to guide and support individuals to reflect on their experiences and then use that learning to improve effectiveness in life and work.
When You Might Resort to the Expert Advice Role
You might choose to fill the expert role when the following conditions exist.
- The project needs general knowledge that would likely be the same in any context.
There are certain types of general knowledge that would likely be the same, especially:
a) General frameworks from which to develop and/or operate systems, for example, performance management systems, financial systems or marketing systems.
b) Guidelines for conducting general practices, for example, planning, evaluation, organizational change, addressing ethical dilemmas, use of capacity building approaches or developing learning plans.
2. The project needs knowledge that is highly specialized and proceduralized. For example, installing computers, conducting market research, conforming to laws and regulations, designing and providing certain program services, financial processes and procedures, or use of specific tools for problem solving and decision making.
When You Might Resort to Training
Training is activities to help a learner or learners to develop or enhance knowledge, skills and attitudes to improve performance on current or future task or job. You might choose to fill the trainer role when the following conditions exist.
- Expert knowledge needs to be conveyed in a concise and timely manner.
There may be times in your project where members need to learn certain expert-based knowledge and need to do so in a highly focused and efficient manner. The knowledge might be any form of expert-based knowledge as listed in the above topic. - Knowledge needs to be conveyed to a group of people.
Training is often most useful when a group of people need to learn expert-based knowledge. This can be quite common in projects, for example, when training project members about the nature of organizational change, the project’s change plans or methods of data collection.
What do you think?
—————————
For more resources, see the Library topics Consulting and Organizational Development.
———————————————————————————
Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD – Authenticity Consulting, LLC – 800-971-2250
Read my weekly blogs: Boards, Consulting and OD, Nonprofits and Strategic Planning.
This is a great article and think it’s an important topic for consultants and the people who hire them. Actually, I just discovered this site; the whole thing is a pretty impressive volume of work. It’s also a useful contribution to address the fragmentation of learning, practice, and profession-building in the arena of organizational change and development. Given the turbulence of of our times and magnitude of our social and environmental challenges, the need for more effective organizational change and development practices will climb higher and higher. I appreciate efforts such as this that aid in creating shared language and identification of practitioner fields that should work together to produce greater, more sustainable results.
For some time now I have thought of myself as an OD consultant, who uses some combination of facilitation, training, coaching, and even mediation, to help organizations achieve their goals. This has been an evolutionary process. In 1991, I founded my own company, Collaborative Solutions, “to help organizations solve problems and create meaningful change.” I felt very strongly about assuming a facilitative role, “trusting the wisdom of the group”, and not taking a position on the substance or direction of their work.
I still stay out of the substance, but over the years I have shifted toward more of the “process consultant” role advocated by Edgar Schein. Many years ago I went through a stage of reading the foundational works of OD consultant pioneers and gained a deeper appreciation for their commitment to working in collaboration with clients and helping them build capacity for generating their own solutions. I saw that they worked simultaneously as consultants (with process expertise), as trainers (who help participants learn while doing), and as coaches (who work on an individual level to strengthen competencies).
The inherent need to work collaboratively to change an entire organization requires individuals to change as well. These are hard changes to make, as we all have long been operating according to the old hierarchical mental model and corresponding behavioral expectations. Any organizational change initiative would be well served by professionals who can perform in multiple roles — as consultants who can call upon their expertise with other efforts and provide insight and specific recommendations, but also as trainers who share specific strategies, and as coaches, who give individual’s encouragement and feedback. Developing abilities to contribute effectively in collaborative large-scale change processes really does requires ongoing consultative advice, training and coaching.
Good job! keep up the great work