Management Function of Organizing: Overview of Methods

A Woman Giving Presentation to Colleagues

Management Function of Organizing: Overview of Methods

Assembled by Carter McNamara, MBA,
PhD

This topis is in regard to the management function of organizing resources.
Organizing can be viewed as the activities to collect and configure resources
in order to implement plans in a highly effective and efficient fashion. Organizing
is a broad set of activities, and often considered one of the major functions
of management. Therefore, there are a wide variety of topics in organizing.
The following are some of the major types of organizing required in a business
organization.

Sections of This Topic Include

Organizing Yourself (your office, files, etc.)
Organizing / Designing Tasks, Jobs or Roles
Organizing Staff
and Your Office

Organizing Various Types of Groups
Organizing Communities (typically a nonprofit goal)
Are You Personally Ready for New Venture?
Guidelines to Reorganize
a Current Organization

Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizing

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which
have posts related to Organizing. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts.
Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog
or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Library’s Career
Management Blog

Library’s
Coaching Blog

Library’s Human Resources
Blog

Library’s Leadership Blog
Library’s Spirituality
Blog

Library’s Supervision
Blog

Also consider

Principles and Guidelines for Organizational Design

Related Library Topics


Organizing Yourself and Your Office

Setting
Up Office Facilities (this section is in “Facilities Management”)

Organizing
Yourself (this subtopic is in “Personal Productivity”)

You Can Do It: No Fail Ways to Finally Get Yourself Organized
How
to Build Your Dream Office

Also consider
Personal
Development

Personal
Productivity

Personal
Wellness

Organizing a Task, Job or Role

Task
and Job Analysis

Job
Description

Employee
Performance Planning (the overall process ensures ongoing, effective
organizing)

Time
Management

Organizing Various Groups of People and Organizations

Committees
of Boards of Directors

Committees
in general

Meetings
Teams
Facilitation
Organization Charts as a Management Tool

Also consider
Guidelines, Methods and Resources for Organizational Change Agents
Organizational
Performance

Community Organizing

THE
CITIZEN’S HANDBOOK

Organizer’s
Online Toolkit

Community Assessments
Association for
Community Organization

Citizen’s
Handbook

4
Ways to Instill The Power of One

Sue Hoechstetter
on Resources for Evaluating Community Organizing


For the Category of Management:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may
want to review some related topics, available from the link below.
Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been
selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Related Library Topics

Recommended Books


What Makes Each Organization Unique

Group Of People Discussing About Work

What Makes Each Organization Unique

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Sections of This Article Include


Factors That Determine an Organization’s Uniqueness

The following list includes some major considerations for you to address when attempting to identify the unique aspects of an organization. The factors are all highly related to, and influenced by, each other.

Culture of the Organization

You work differently with an organization, depending on the organization’s culture. An organization’s culture is similar to its overall “personality.” For example, some organizations operate in a highly “business-like” fashion with extensive formality of rules. Other organizations pride themselves on operating in a highly informal, relaxed fashion.

Style of the Top Leadership

There is a variety of leadership styles, ranging from highly involved to detached. Autocratic leadership means decisions are made from the top down, and often based on the personality of the top leaders. In contrast, participative leaders aim to involve as many people in decisions as is practical and decisions are often made by consensus.

Life Cycle of the Organization

The particular life cycle of an organization can make a big difference in how change should be carried out because organizations often operate differently during different life cycle stages. For example, the nature of their planning, policies and procedures can change substantially between stages.

Size of the Organization

The larger the organization, the sometimes more complex the nature of its issues and the more complex the actions needed to address those issues. Size is in terms of the number of divisions, products and services, and personnel because those features are most often associated with specific organizational issues.

Strategies and Structures of the Organization

In this context, strategies refer to the overall approaches used by the organization to effectively meet the needs of its stakeholders. Those approaches include how the organization identifies the needs and then works to meet them. The structures are the result of the organization’s overall strategies and include, for example, organizational design, policies, plans, procedures and roles.

Rate of Change in the External Environment

Certain types of organizations are in the midst of tremendous change, for example, technologies, health care and transportation. Often, the faster the rate of change in the external environment, the more rapid are the decisions and actions in the internal environment.

So Are Nonprofits and For-Profits Really Very Different?

Notice that none of the above factors is directly in regard to the nature of the products and services provided by the organization. There is often a misunderstanding that products and services make a big difference. Usually, they do not.

For example, many people assert that there is a big difference between nonprofits and for-profits. However, they often are comparing small, start-up nonprofits in their first life cycle with large, established for-profits in a mature life cycle. Instead, small nonprofits are much more like small for-profits than large nonprofits. Similarly, large nonprofits are much more like large for-profits than small nonprofits.

For example, notice the model of life cycles at https://staging.management.org/organizations/life-cycles.htm#example. Then think about small nonprofits and for-profits and about how similar their features often are during the start-up phase.

Others assert that nonprofits are different because they are much more diverse. However, for-profits are increasingly diverse, as well, as the work force becomes increasingly diverse.

Others assert that nonprofits are unique in that they do fundraising. However, for-profits are constantly focused on potential sources of funding and many regularly borrow money from different sources, especially if it ultimately would be profitable to do so.

Others assert that nonprofits are unique because they have volunteer and (usually) unpaid Board members. However, the legal requirements and best practices between nonprofit and for-profit corporations are very similar in the operations of the Boards of Directors.

This Article is in a Series About Understanding Organizational Structures and Design

This article is the second in the series which includes:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems

4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational Culture
6. Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design
9. Basic Guidelines for Organizational Design
10. Wrap Up: Grasping the Big Picture in Organizations (video)


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizations

In addition to the information on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Two Basic Types of Organizations: For-Profit (Business) and Nonprofit

Group Of People Having A Discussion While Seated On The Floor

Two Basic Types of Organizations: For-Profit (Business) and Nonprofit

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.
Adapted from the Field Guide to Consulting and Organizational Development and
Field Guide to Consulting and Organizational Development with Nonprofits.

Sections of This Topic Include

Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Types of Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to Types of Organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Also consider


NOTE: Many people would argue that a nonprofit organization is also a business organization, if they believe that a business is an organization that provides value to consumers and gets suitable value in return.

For-Profit (Business) Organizations

A for-profit organization exists primarily to generate a profit, that is, to take in more money than it spends. The owners can decide to keep all the profit themselves, or they can spend some or all of it on the business itself. Or, they may decide to share some of it with employees through the use of various types of compensation plans, e.g., employee profit sharing.

(We’ll read later about the legal forms of a for-profit, including sole proprietorships, partnerships and corporations. More information is available back in the main category Understanding Organizations.

Nonprofit Organizations

(The following information, in large part, was developed by Putnam Barber, President of the Evergreen State Society in Seattle, Washington)

A nonprofit organization exists to provide a particular service to the community. The word “nonprofit” refers to a type of business — one which is organized under rules that forbid the distribution of profits to owners. “Profit” in this context is a relatively technical accounting term, related to but not identical with the notion of a surplus of revenues over expenditures.

Most nonprofits businesses are organized into corporations. Most corporations are formed under the corporations laws of a particular state. Every state has provisions for forming nonprofit corporations; some permit other forms, such as unincorporated associations, trusts, etc., which may operate as nonprofit businesses on slightly (but sometimes importantly) different terms.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) gets involved because corporations are, in general, required to pay federal corporate income taxes on their net earning (another technical term, pointing to a slightly different way to the idea of a surplus of revenue over expenses).

Section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code lists several circumstances under which corporations are exempt from these taxes. Section 501(c)(3) — the famous one — describes corporations (1) serving charitable, religious, scientific or educational purposes (2) no part of the income of which “inures to the benefit of” anyone.

Tax-exempt nonprofit corporations can, and do, operate in all other particulars like any other sort of business. They have bank accounts; own productive assets of all kinds; receive income from sales and other forms of activity, including donations and grants if they are successful at finding that sort of support; make and hold passive investments; employ staff; enter into contracts of all sorts; etc.

There are some specialized tax rules and accounting practices that apply to nonprofit corporations. If they are of a certain size, they are required to disclose many details of their operations to the general public and to state regulators and watchdog agencies using IRS form 990. This form shows any salaries paid to officers or directors and to the five highest-paid employees and contracts if any receive over $50,000 in the tax year (at the time of this writing in 1998). The form also requires the organization to divide its expenses into “functional categories” — program, administration and fund-raising — and report the totals for each along with the amounts expended on each program activity.

To understand more about nonprofits, see
Field Guide to Consulting and Organizational Development With Nonprofits (for consultants and internal leaders in USA and Canada)

Additional Perspectives on Nonprofit Organizations


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


How All Social Organizations Are the Same: They’re All Systems

Two Men and Woman Discussing Work

How All Social Organizations Are the Same: They’re All Systems

Much of the content of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.
Adapted from the Field Guide to Consulting and Organizational Development.

Sections of This Article Include


Recently, management studies has come to view organizations from a new perspective: a systems perspective. This systems perspective may seem quite basic. Yet, decades of management training and practices in the workplace have not followed from this perspective.

Only recently, with tremendous changes facing organizations and how they operate, have educators and managers come to face this new way of looking at things. This interpretation has brought about a significant change (or paradigm shift) in the way management studies and approaches organizations.

First, What is a System?

Despite the complexity of organizations as explained in the topic What is an Organization?, it helps a great deal to think of organizations as systems. When reading the following paragraphs about systems, think of an organization that you know — or even about other systems, such as automobiles or plants.

Simply put, a system is an organized collection of parts that are highly integrated in order to accomplish an overall goal or outcome. The system has various inputs which are processed to produce certain outputs, that together, accomplish the overall goal desired by the system. There is ongoing feedback among these various parts to ensure they remain aligned to accomplish the overall goal.

For example, in an organization, the inputs might be funding, people, facilities and technologies. (For an actual organization, the list of inputs would be much longer and more specific.) Processes would be, for example, using the money to train people, developing and marketing products and services, and measuring customer satisfaction. Outputs would be the, for example, the number of products and services that were sold. The overall goals, our desired outcome, would be highly satisfied customers sufficient that they pay a suitable price and the organization remains financially viable.

A pile of sand is not a system. If one removes a sand particle, you’ve still got a pile of sand. However, a functioning car is a system. Remove the carburetor and you no longer have a working car.

Systems range from very simple to very complex. There are numerous types of systems. For example, there are biological systems (for example, the heart), mechanical systems (an automobile), human/mechanical systems (riding a bicycle), ecological systems (predators and prey) and social systems (departments and groups).

For more information about systems in general, see Systems Thinking, Systems Tools and Chaos Theory.

Tools to Depict a System

There are a variety of tools to depict the inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes in systems, as well as the recurring cycle (or loops) of activities within them. One of the most straightforward to use is a logic model. The model can be very useful when planning or analyzing a system. It can also be very useful for describing the system to others. Here is an example of a logic model for an educational program, which is itself a system as depicted in the logic model.

Inputs

Processes

Outputs

Free articles and other publications on the Web
– Collaborators
– Free Management Library
– Funders
– Self-directed learners
– Volunteers
– Computers
– Web
– Supplies
– Provide peer-assistance models in which learners support each other
– Provide free, online training program: Basics of Self-Directed Learning
– Provide free, online training program: Basic Life Skills
– Provide free, online training program: Passing your GED Exam
– 30 groups that used peer models
– 100 completed training programs
– 900 learners who finished Basics of Self-Directed Learning
– 900 learners who finished Basic Life Skills
– 900 learners who passed their GED to gain high-school diploma

The next columns in a logic model are the outcomes that the outputs go into and produce.

Short-term outcome(s)
(new knowledge)

Intermediate outcomes
(new skills)

Long-term outcomes
(new abilities and perceptions)

– High-school diploma for graduates
– Increased interest to attend advanced schooling
– Increased confidence that learner can manage formal learning programs
– Full-time employment for learners in jobs that require high-school education
– Independent living for learners from using salary to rent housing
– Strong basic life skills for learners
– Improved attitude toward self and society for graduates
– Improved family life for families of graduates
– Increased reliability and improved judgment of learners

In the above example, the educational program is continually get feedback from people in the program as well as the students who participate in it. The feedback is used especially to improve the quality of the inputs and the processes in the system. Thus, there is a recurring loop of activities in the system.

These articles can explain more about logic models and systems tools.

Critical Role of Feedback in a System

Any system that does not have continual and useful feedback shared among its various subsystems will likely produce low-quality outcomes or will fail altogether. That is true for all systems, including social systems like organizations and mechanical systems like automobiles.

In an organization, feedback should continually be collected and evaluated from those it serves, but also between the various parts of the organization. If a certain team in an organization is not getting sufficient feedback from its supervisors, then the team will not optimally perform.

If the supervisors are not getting sufficient feedback from executives, then supervisors will not perform well either. This is why internal communications are critical to the success of any organization.

Many leaders and managers intuitively know those connections and the importance of communications. However, that understanding is made much more clear and important when they can see that the communications are, in essence, the “life’s blood” of the system. That is why significant change in organizations always requires ongoing communications in the organization from the top down and from
the bottom up. See Organizational Communications

So Why is it Important to Look at Organizations as Systems?

In the past, when an organization was struggling, managers typically focused on fixing one part. For example, when there were continual shortages of money, then they worked to get more money. Soon, they realized that they were still running out of money because they still were spending too much and perhaps not earning enough. So they would cut costs, while doing more marketing in order to get more revenue.

Then they would realize that they were not getting more customers because customers were reporting that the quality of their products and services was very poor. So then the mangers would attend to improving quality. Then the managers might realize that they could not improve quality without getting more internal expertise, which requires yet more money. That, in turn, requires he top executives to really believe that more money is really going to make a difference -t his time.

Today’s managers have learned to have a systems perspective. They work to improve their organizations, not by examining what appear to be separate pieces of the organization, but by recognizing the larger patterns in interactions.

Closed Systems Fail — Open Systems Flourish

What is a Closed System?

Any organization has to regularly exchange useful feedback among its own parts if it is to thrive. However, an organization can do that and still fail if it does not exchange that kind of feedback with its customers — people who are outside of the organization.

An organization that does not exchange feedback with its immediate outside environment is called a closed system. You might be able to think of some examples of organizations that quit listening to the opinions of those outside of it and, as a result, their products and services continued to be lower quality.

Or, you might be able to think of organizations that, while they continued to have high-quality products and services, their organization was perceived as operating in a highly unethical manner. Yet, the organization ignored the opinions of those outside stakeholders and eventually the organization’s sales and profit suffered.

What is an Open System?

So an open organizational system is one that regularly exchanges useful feedback with all of its important external stakeholders, for example, its customers, collaborators, leaders in the community and researchers in the industry.

Those kinds of communications often requires careful planning, implementation and monitoring. Inexperienced or unwise leaders and managers might see that effort as a distraction from focusing on their own visions and ideas. While that will seem passionate and productive for a while, it soon will fail. An
example of this situation if what some people refer to as Founder’s Syndrome where an organization is operating more to the personality of someone in the organization than to its mission to serve others. See Founder’s Syndrome.

Here is a depiction of a logic model of an open systems view of an organization.

System Within Each Management Function

Description of Various Subsystems — You Will Recognize Them

There are numerous examples of subsystems in organizations. Think of any recurring processes, such as the management functions of strategic planning, marketing and financial management.

  1. For example, the inputs to financial management might be the budget plans from other departments.
  2. The processes in financial management might be continually monitoring the income and expenses occurred during operations.
  3. The outputs might be financial reports to management. (In that situation, management is really an internal customer to the Finance Department.)
  4. The reports help achieve the goal of continually informed managers who, in turn, make wise decisions in the organization.
  5. Management’s decisions might affect the budgets of the various departments.
  6. Those budgets change the inputs to the financial management system.

Similarly,

  1. The outputs of the recurring strategic planning process are inputs to the recurring program or product planning processes.
  2. The outputs of the program and product planning processes are inputs to the financial planning process.
  3. The outputs of that process are the inputs to the fundraising process (in the case of nonprofits).

How You Can Integrate and Depict Relationships Between Subsystems

That loop, or system, of activities continues as long as the organization is in operation. Similar loops occur in each of the major functions in an organization. Here are depictions of some common subsystems in an organization.
Examples of Systems View of Management Functions

You can use logic models to show the integration and alignment of various subsystems in an organization by “chaining” the logic models. See How to Chain Logic Models

This diagnostic model also explains the relationships between each of the management functions in a for-profit organization.
Systems-Based Model to Diagnose For-Profit Organizations.

This model explains the relationships in a nonprofit organization.
Systems-Based Model to Diagnose Nonprofit Organizations.

Suggested Exercise

Here is a template for a logic model. You might think of a system in your work or personal life and diagram the system in the template.


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizations

In addition to the information on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations

Person Holding Gray Twist Pen and White Paper on Brown Wooden Table

Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Sections of This Article Include


Introduction

The organization’s structure, or design, is the overall arrangement of the organization’s various roles, processes and their relationships in the organization. The design of an organization is a means to accomplishing the organization’s overall goal — the structure is not an end in itself. In systems theory terms, the design ensures that the appropriate inputs go through the necessary processes to produce the required outputs to produce the intended outcomes.


Broad Overview of Primary Legal Forms of For-Profit Organizations

For-profit businesses are usually of three primary legal forms, including unincorporated, corporations and limited liability companies. There are other forms of businesses, too, for example, nonprofit, franchises, government-owned corporations, cooperatives, limited liability corporation (“L3C”), etc. The three primary
forms are explained below. (More information is available in the topic Enterprise Law.)

A corporation is a privately owned corporation or a publicly held corporation, depending on whether the corporation is owned privately or by the public at large.

Business people should seek the counsel of a lawyer when determining what legal form of business they should choose.

1. Unincorporated (sole proprietorships or partnerships)

Most small for-profit businesses are unincorporated. As an unincorporated organization, you can be a sole proprietor or in a partnership. A sole proprietorship is owned by one person or a marriage. Business activity is viewed by the IRS as your personal activity, for example, business income and taxes are viewed as your personal income and taxes. The sole proprietor is personally liable for the business.

A partnership can be a general partnership or a limited partnership. A general partnership is viewed by the IRS essentially as two or more sole proprietors equally responsible for the business. The terms of sole proprietorship apply fully to each partner. In limited partnership includes one or more general partners and one or more limited partners. Limited partners are liable for activities of the business to the extent of their investment.

2. Corporations (C Corporations and S Corporations)

A corporation is formed as its own legal entity, apart from the individuals who own and/or formed the organization. (The corporation can be either for-profit or nonprofit. More on nonprofits later on below.). The principals of a for-profit business decide to incorporate mostly to shield them for personal liability for activities of the business and/or to sell stock in the business. A corporate Boards of Directors oversees policy and strategy for corporations, whether for-profit or nonprofit. Principals and board members of for-profit corporations typically have little or no liability for operations of the corporation, unless the owners or board members broke federal and/or state laws in running the corporation.

Theoretically the for-profit and nonprofit corporation exists forever, past the death of its owners. For-profit corporations can be a C Corporation or Subchapter S Corporation. More about these in the topic Enterprise Law.)

3. Limited Liability Companies (LLC)

The LLC is a relatively new form that combines the advantages of a corporation (minimum personal liability, selling stock, etc.) with those of a sole proprietorship and partnership (sharing management decisions, profit, etc). The LLC is an increasingly popular form of organization.


Broad Overview of Primary Legal Forms of Non-Profit Organizations

As noted above, for-profit businesses are usually of three legal forms, including unincorporated, corporations and limited liability companies. There are other forms of businesses, too, for example, nonprofit, franchises, government-owned corporations, cooperatives, etc. The following link provides more information about nonprofits, including their many legal forms.
What is a Nonprofit?


Traditional Organizational Structures and Design in Businesses

See the organization charts depicted in Traditional Organizational Structures and Design in Businesses.

Functional Structure

Most organizations start out with a functional structure, or a small variation of this structure. This is the basic “building block” for other structures. It is useful because it recognizes that there are different types of recurring management functions (Manufacturing, Sales, Marketing, etc.) in the organization and it also ensures coordination of these activities by a central office.

Divisional Structure

This structure is typically for well established organizations that have multiple and often complex products such that each product requires its own functionally designed structure. Similar to the functional structure, it recognizes that there are different types of product lines, each of which requires different its own functional structure of different management functions.

Matrix Structure

This is referred to as a matrix because it is essentially a grid with rows and columns. The different rows represent different management functions and the columns represent different products. In this structure, highly skilled personnel in each management function are shared across different product lines. Thus, each person reports to a functional manager and a product manager.


Traditional Organizational Structures and Design in Nonprofits

See the organization charts depicted in Traditional Organizational Structures and Design in Nonprofits.

Functional Structure With Non CEO

New nonprofits often start by having no paid staff, including no paid CEO. The CEO might even be a member of the Board of Directors — a practice that is often frowned upon by key stakeholders because a CEO reports to the Board of Directors and, thus, there is an inherent conflict of interest in having a CEO on the Board. Thus, the CEO usually is not on the Board later on. Staff members are all volunteers.

Functional Structure With a CEO

The CEO reports to the Board of Directors and is not on the Board. Staff members are paid as is the CEO. In this structure, different employees might begin being associated with certain different programs.

Program-Based Structure With a CEO

In this structure, the nonprofit has different programs each of which has employees dedicated to operating a certain program for the nonprofits clients. The manager of each program reports to the CEO.

If the nonprofit continues to expand with each program expanding as well, then it might evolve into a divisional structure as explained in the above section.


New Structures of Organizations

Driving Forces Causing New Structures

In organizational design, there is a guideline that “form follows function”. In other words, the structure of the organization is a strategy to work toward the purpose and priorities of the organization. There are numerous driving forces that are causing organizations to re-think their priorities, for example, driving forces such as increasing diversity in the workforce, expanding markets around the world, and the public’s increasing demands for more transparency and accountability for how organizations operate.
Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design

In addition, to become more adaptable to the rapidly changing environments outside and inside of organizations, organizations are resorting to different structures in how they operate.

B-Corporations

From the B-Corp website “Certified B Corporations are a new kind of business that balances purpose and profit. They are legally required to consider the impact of their decisions on their workers, customers, suppliers, community, and the environment. This is a community of leaders, driving a global movement of people using business as a force for good.”
B-Corp as a Competitive Edge

This Article is in a Series About Understanding Organizational Structures and Design

This article is the sixth in the series which includes:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems

4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational Culture
6. Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design
9. Basic Guidelines for Organizational Design
10. Wrap Up: Grasping the Big Picture in Organizations (video)


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.


Additional Perspectives on Forms of Organizations


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm

Serious young businesswoman working with report in office

Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm

© Copyright Carter
McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC
.

Sections of This Article Include

Driving Forces of Change
Traits of the New Paradigm

Also consider
Related Library Topics


Driving Forces of Change

Around the 1960s and on to today, the environment of today’s organizations
has changed a great deal. A variety of driving forces provoke
this change. Increasing telecommunications has “shrunk”
the world substantially. Increasing diversity of workers has brought
in a wide array of differing values, perspectives and expectations
among workers. Public consciousness has become much more sensitive
and demanding that organizations be more socially responsible.
Much of the third-world countries has joined the global marketplace,
creating a wider arena for sales and services. Organizations became
responsible not only to stockholders (those who owned stock) but
to a wider community of “stakeholders.”

As a result of the above driving forces,
organizations were required to adopt a “new paradigm,”
or view on the world, to be more sensitive, flexible and adaptable
to the demands and expectations of stakeholder demands. Many organizations
have abandoned or are abandoning the traditional top-down, rigid
and hierarchical structures to more “organic” and fluid
forms.

Today’s leaders and/or managers must
deal with continual, rapid change. Managers faced with a major
decision can no longer refer back to an earlier developed plan
for direction. Management techniques must continually notice changes
in the environment and organization, assess this change and manage
change. Managing change does not mean controlling it, rather understanding
it, adapting to it where necessary and guiding it when possible.

Managers can’t know it all or reference resources for every situation. Managers
must count on and listen more to their employees. Consequently, new forms of
organizations are becoming more common, e.g., worker-centered teams, self-organizing
and self-designing teams.

Traits of the New Paradigm

Marilyn Ferguson, in The New Paradigm: Emerging Strategic for
Leadership and Organizational Change
(Michael Ray and Alan
Rinzler, Eds., 1993, New Consciousness Reader), provides a very
concise overview of the differences between the old and new paradigm.
(The following is summarized.)

Old Paradigm

New Paradigm

promote consumption at all costs appropriate consumption
people to fit jobs jobs to fit people
imposed goals, top-down decision making autonomy encouraged, worker participation
fragmentation in work and roles cross-fertilization by specialists seeing wide relevance
identification with job identity transcends job description
clock model of company recognition of uncertainty
aggression, competition cooperation
work and play are separate blurring of work and play
manipulation and dominance cooperation with nature
struggle for stability sense of change, of becoming
quantitative qualitative as well as quantitative
strictly economic motives spiritual value transcends material gain
polarized transcends polarities
short-sighted ecologically sensitive
rational rational and intuitive
emphasis on short-term solutions recognition that long-range efficiency must take into account
harmonious work environment
centralized operations decentralized operations when possible
runaway, unbridled technology appropriate technology
allopathic treatment of symptoms attempt to understand the whole, locate deep underlying causes
of disharmony

This Article is in a Series About Understanding Organizational Structures and Design

This article is the seventh in the series which includes:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What
Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems

4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in
Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational
Culture

6. Legal Forms and Traditional
Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational
Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New
Organizational Structures and Design
9. Basic Guidelines for Organizational
Design
10. Wrap
Up: Grasping the Big Picture in Organizations (video)


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizations

In addition to the information on this current page, see the following blogs
which have posts related to organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see
various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the
blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Library’s
Consulting and Organizational Development Blog

Library’s
Leadership Blog

Library’s
Nonprofit Capacity Building Blog


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Related Library Topics

Recommended Books


How to Conduct a Basic Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis

Female employee raising hand for asking question at conference in office boardroom

How to Conduct a Basic Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

This Article is in a Series About Analyzing Organizations

This article is the eighth in the series which includes:

1. How to Conduct a Basic Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis

Sections of This Article Include

What is an Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis?

How is an Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis Done?


What is an Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis?

An organizational analysis is an evaluation of the quality of some or all of
the activities within an organization and preferrably the quality of feedback
exchanged with key stakeholders, as well. The style of the analysis ranges from
intuitive and spontaneous to planned and orderly depending on the reasons for
the analysis. There are several important reasons, including:

  1. To identify the causes of current and significant issues to soon resolve
    within the organization.
  2. As part of a strategic planning process in order to identify important internal
    priorities to address over the coming years.
  3. In preparation for an upcoming significant change, for example, a merger
    with another organization or a strategy to globalize the organization into
    other countries.
  4. In preparation for approaching funders and, thus, the need for presenting
    a forthright and credible analysis so the funder understands the true situation
    within the organization.

How the Analysis is Done — the Role of Diagnostic
Models

What is a Diagnostic Model?

An analysis could collect a vast range of information. However, unless there
is some framework around which to know what information to collect and how to
make judgments about that information, the analysis will likely become a very
overwhelming and confusing endeavor. This is where a diagnostic model is very
useful. A good diagnostic model will:

  1. Suggest some standard of performance about how a high-quality organization
    should be operating, including about the quality of its overall intended outcomes,
    practices within the organization and how those practices are integrated with
    each other.
  2. Suggest what types of information need to be collected in order to compare
    the current performance of the organization with the suggested standard of
    performance.
  3. Facilitate the comparison of the current performance of the organization
    to the preferred standard of performance in order to generate recommendations
    to improve the performance of the organization.

So How is an Organizational Evaluation and Diagnosis Done?

Here are the typical phases of a well-planned organizational analysis.

  1. Clarify the reason and, thus, the focus of the analysis, for example, to
    resolve a certain major issue in the organization, such as recurring shortfalls
    of cash that threaten the sustainability of the organization.
  2. Select the best diagnostic model needed to assess the quality of the various
    best practices around ensuring sustainability, including of the finances.
    Numerous diagnostic models are listed at
  3. Reference the model in order to identify what types of information should
    be collected around those best practices.
  4. Select the best tools to collect the necessary information. Various criteria
    for screening tools are listed in the article How
    to Select from Among Public Data Collection Tools
    .
  5. Collect the necessary information, including to organize it into any categories
    suggested by the diagnostic model.
  6. Analyze the information in order to compare the current performance of the
    organization to the standard of performance suggested by the diagnostic model.
  7. Generate an analysis report that explains the major findings of the analysis
    and the recommendations regarding how to improve the organization’s practices
    around ensuring sustainability.

The manner in which those recommendations are implemented are out of the scope
of the activities in an organizational analysis and are more a matter of the
activities in guiding and supporting organizational change. See Guidelines,
Methods and Resources for Organizational Change Agents
.


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to New Forms of Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which
have posts related to New Forms of Organizations. Scan down the blog’s page
to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in
the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post
in the blog.

Library’s
Consulting and Organizational Development Blog

Library’s
Leadership Blog

Library’s
Nonprofit Capacity Building Blog

Also consider
Organizational Structures and Design
Materials Apply to Nonprofits and For-Profits


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Related Library Topics

Recommended Books


Basic Overview of Nonprofit Organizations

People in the Office

Basic Overview of Nonprofit Organizations

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.
Adapted from the Field Guide to Leadership and Supervision in Business
and Field Guide to Leadership and Supervision for Nonprofit Staff.

Applies to nonprofits unless otherwise noted.

Sections of This Topic Include

Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Nonprofit Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to Nonprofit Organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Also consider
Related Library Topics


Suggested Previous Reading

Note that the reader might best be served to first read the document Introduction to Organizations to understand the overall general nature of all organizations. As noted in that document, today’s leaders are faced with continual change in their organizations. Consequently, today’s leaders should have a strong sense of what their organizations are about. This document will accomplish that for nonprofit leaders.

An organization is a collection of resources arranged to accomplish an overall goal. The purpose of a nonprofit organization is to meet one or more needs in a community. Each nonprofit describes its overall purpose in a mission statement. (Very simply put, the word “nonprofit” means an organization that does not distribute a profit.)

Typical types of nonprofit services are advocacy, arts, civic, cultural, education, health and human service. Nonprofits range in size from extremely large (e.g., Red Cross, large hospitals, etc.) to extremely small (e.g., organizations that have no full-time personnel, and operate only with volunteers).

What is a “Nonprofit”?

Some Basics …

(by Carter McNamara)
Before you start your nonprofit, it’s helpful to realize that the phrase “starting a nonprofit” can mean many things. Read the following very basic information to begin thinking about what you mean when you set out to “start a nonprofit”.

– You can be a nonprofit organization just by getting together with some friends, eg, to form a self-help group. In this case, you’re an informal nonprofit organization.

– Consider incorporating your nonprofit so it exists as a separate legal organization in order to a) own its own property and its own bank account; b) ensure that the nonprofit can continue on its own (even after you’re gone); and c) protect yourself personally for operations of the nonprofit. You incorporate your nonprofit by filing articles of incorporation with the appropriate local state office. (An incorporated nonprofit requires a board of directors.)

– If you want to be exempt from federal taxes (and maybe some other taxes, too), you should file with the IRS to be a tax-exempt organization. (The IRS states that you must be a corporation, community chest, fund, or foundation to receive tax-exempt status. Articles of association may also be used in place of incorporation.) (Probably the most well known type of nonprofits is a the IRS classification of 501(c)(3), a “charitable nonprofit’.)

– Depending on the nature of your organization, you may also granted tax-deductible status from the IRS. Publication 526 lists the types of organizations to which donations are deductible.

– So, if you did all of these steps, you’d be an incorporated, tax-exempt nonprofit that could receive tax deductible donations.

– The particular steps you take depend on your plans for your organization, including the nature of its services. They also depend on how the IRS interprets the nature of your organization, including its services.

And Now Some Refinement on the Description of “Nonprofit”

(by Putnam Barber)
(Items in brackets “[!]” are added by Carter McNamara.)

The word “nonprofit” refers to a type of business — one which is organized under rules that forbid the distribution of profits to owners. “Profit” in this context is a relatively technical accounting term, related to but not identical with the notion of a surplus of revenues over expenditures.

Most [registered!] nonprofits businesses are organized into corporations [or associations!]. Most corporations are formed under the corporations laws of a particular state. Every state has provisions for forming nonprofit corporations; some permit other forms, such as unincorporated associations, trusts, etc., which may operate as nonprofit businesses on slightly (but sometimes importantly) different terms.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) gets involved because corporations are, in general, required to pay federal corporate income taxes on their net earning (another technical term, pointing to a slightly different way to the idea of a surplus of revenue over expenses).

Section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code lists several circumstances under which corporations [or unincorporated nonprofits!] are exempt from these taxes. Section 501(c)(3) — the famous one — describes
[nonprofit!] (1) serving charitable, religious, scientific or educational purposes (2) no part of the income of which “inures to the benefit of” anyone.

Tax-exempt nonprofit organizations can, and do, operate in all other particulars like any other sort of business. They have bank accounts; own productive assets of all kinds; receive income from sales and other forms of activity, including donations and grants if they are successful at finding that sort of support; make and hold passive investments; employ staff; enter into contracts of all sorts; etc.

There are some specialized tax rules and accounting practices that apply to nonprofit organizations. If they are of a certain size, they are required to disclose many details of their operations to the general public and to state regulators and watchdog agencies using IRS form 990. This form shows any salaries paid to officers or directors [for incorporated nonprofits!] and to the five highest-paid employees and contracts if any receive over $50,000 in the tax year.

The form also requires the organization to divide its expenses into “functional categories” — program, administration and fund-raising — and report the totals for each along with the amounts expended on each program activity.

Nonprofit organizations file for tax-exemption by using IRS Publication 557, “Tax-Exempt Status for Your Organization“.

To view various kinds of tax-exempt (Section 501) organizations, see IRS Tax-Exempt Organization Reference Chart

Key Roles

(by Carter McNamara)
· Clients – Everything in a nonprofit is ultimately directed to serving clients. Clients are the “consumers” or “customers” of the nonprofit’s services. Note that services can be in the form of tangible or intangible products.

· Board – The board is comprised of individuals from the community and, ideally, is representative of the organizations clients. Law and theory dictate that the board is in charge, and directly accountable for the overall direction and policies of the organization. Powers are given to the board by the Articles of Incorporation (or other governing document, for example, Articles of Association, Constitution, etc.).

The board can configure the nonprofit in whatever structure it prefers to meet the organization’s mission and usually does so via specifications in bylaws. Members of nonprofit boards are generally motivated by a desire to serve the community and the personal satisfaction of volunteering. Nonprofit board members may not receive monetary compensation for serving on the board.

See the library topic Boards for description of the overall responsibilities of a board, key board roles, how meetings are carried out, etc.

· Board Chair – A board chair’s role is central to coordinating the work of the board, executive director and committees. The chair’s role may have appointive power for committees, depending on what is specified about this role in the bylaws. The power of the board chair is usually through persuasion and general leadership. See the topic Board Chair for an overview of the board chair role.

· Committees – Typically, the board chooses to carry out its operations using a variety of board committees. The topic Description of Typical Committees for a description of typical board committees.

· Executive Director – The board typically chooses to have this one person who is ultimately responsible
to carry out the wishes of the board. The executive director is directly accountable for the work of the staff and supports the work of the board committees. For more information, see the library topic Chief Executive Role.

· Staff – Staff report to the executive director and may support the work of the committees.

· Volunteers – Volunteers are unpaid personnel who assist staff, serve on committees and generally work under the direction of the executive director. See the topic Volunteer Programs for an understanding of the role of volunteers.

Three Major Aspects of Nonprofit Structure

(by Carter McNamara)
Typically, the nonprofit operations are organized into major functions. These functions usually include central administration and programs.

· Governance – The governance function of a nonprofit is responsible to provide overall strategic direction, guidance and controls. Often the term “governance” refers to board matters. However, many people are coming to consider governance as a function carried out by the board and top management. Effective of governance depends to a great extent on the working relationship between board and top management.
· Programs – Typically, nonprofits work from their overall mission, or purpose, to identify a few basic service goals which must be reached to accomplish their mission. Resources are organized into programs to reach each goal. It often helps to think of programs in terms of inputs, process, outputs and outcomes. Inputs are the various resources needed to run the program, e.g., money, facilities, clients, program staff, etc.

The process is how the program is carried out, e.g., clients are counseled, children are cared for, art is created, association members are supported, etc. The outputs are the units of service, e.g., number of clients counseled, children cared for, artistic pieces produced, or members in the association. Outcomes are the impacts on the clients receiving services, e.g., increased mental health, safe and secure development, richer artistic appreciation and perspectives in life, increased effectiveness among members, etc.

· Central administration – Central administration is the staff and facilities that are common to running all programs. This usually includes at least the executive director and office personnel. Nonprofits usually strive to keep costs of central administration low in proportion to costs to run programs.

Management Skills Generally Unique to Nonprofits

The following link provides a wide list of areas of knowledge and skills needed in management activities. The link also lists skills that are somewhat unique to nonprofit management. The nonprofit-unique skills are also listed below.
Areas of Knowledge and Skills Needed in Management
What is Management? How Do I Manage?

Areas of Knowledge and Skills that are Generally Unique to Nonprofits

How to Manage Nonprofit-Specific Activities

Current Major Challenge: Devolution

(by Keri Poeppe)
“Devolution” is a word used a great deal these days among nonprofit funders and leaders. Essentially devolution is the short-hand word for a strong trend of cutbacks in federal funding to nonprofits (especially for programs such as welfare (AFDC and certain SSI programs) and the resulting changes in responsibility for administering such programs. Legislation passed by the Congress reduces (and in some cases) eliminates a federal commitment to automatically provide assistance to the poor.

Instead, blocks of funds (usually in reduced levels) will be passed through to states, allowing them to decide who will receive aid and who will not. Thus, devolution is associated with the end of what is often called “entitlements” to services previously guaranteed by the federal government.

While devolution provides opportunity for more local control and possibly less bureaucratic waste, human services programs will be at great risk due to reduced federal (and therefore state) funding. Nonprofits (which, on average, receive approximately 30 percent of their revenues from federal sources) will suffer significant loss of funds which may be very difficult to replace. Meanwhile, public demand for human services continues to increase.

Devolution brings many challenges to nonprofit leaders. They must operate more effectively in the face of reduced funding. They must consider substantial changes in the way they have operated. Concepts such as strategic alliances and restructuring will become commonplace.

Revenue: Fees and Fundraising

(by Keri Poeppe)

Fees

Fees may be associated with these services and billed to either the person receiving the service (e.g. the parent with a child in daycare) or to a third party such as a government agency that supports such services. Unlike the private sector where the price of a product or service must cover all costs, nonprofit agencies rarely meet all their costs based upon sales and fees. Instead nonprofits must engage in fundraising and seek additional revenue sources.

It is important to note that while many nonprofits provide services that are valuable to our community, it is often difficult to measure the actual results of their services. Changes in an individual’s or a community’s behavior may take years to be realized. Nonetheless, nonprofits are challenged to demonstrate results as donors become more savvy and funding sources become increasingly limited.

Fundraising

As noted above, nonprofit managers (and the board of directors) must engage in fundraising in order to meet the fiscal needs of their organization. Generally, fundraising is not one of an executive director’s favorite tasks. It can be an all-consuming activity, tapping an executive director’s creative and social energy.

Executive directors are constantly challenged to strike a balance between the time they devote to fundraising and program management. Too little attention to one area can leave an organization bereft of cash or quality services.

There are several basic sources of funding in the nonprofit sector. The first is a grant. Grants may be given by government agencies, foundations or corporations, usually to operate a specific program. As noted earlier, agencies receiving government grants to operate human service programs base their reimbursement on fees for the services. Grants from foundations or corporations are generally provided up front and require a report on program activities and expenditures at the end of the grant period.

Nonprofit organizations will solicit individuals for funds, also. Individual donations may come from an organization’s membership or constituents (e.g. viewers of public television or residents of a neighborhood community). These are generally small donations, ideally from a large number of people. Sizable gifts may come from individuals who are referred to as major donors. Cultivating relationships with major donors requires the energy and resourcefulness of the board and director. Many nonprofits will hold special events to raise dollars. These vary from bake sales to major events.

Fundraising can be a full-time job (or a full-time obsession) for nonprofit executive directors. Executive Directors are challenged to balance their time between raising money and program management. If too much time is spent on fundraising, programs and staff may not get the direction and coaching they need. On the other hand, if fundraising takes a back seat to program management, the organization’s cash flow will suffer.

Two factors will enhance fundraising efforts. One is good programs. Programs that are meeting important community needs and demonstrating results will sell themselves. A board that is committed to its fundraising responsibilities will also be an asset to the organization. Board members who take their role in fundraising very seriously will promote the organization and help bring resources to it.

It is important to note, however, how the political climate can affect an organization’s fundraising. Foundations and corporations may choose specific issues or causes for priority in grantmaking. In the 1980’s organizations working with the elderly received major support from foundations and the government. These same organizations saw their support decrease as youth issues became a major focus in the 1990’s.

Unique Nature and Struggles of Traditional Small Nonprofits

(by Sandra Larson)

The Heart of the Matter: Leadership and Management

At the heart of any successful nonprofit is an effective chief executive and board of directors. These leaders must work as a team with vision, skill, and sufficient resources to accomplish the organization’s mission. While leadership is shared, critical management skills must rest with the chief executive. However, the board must be sufficiently skilled in management to assess the work of this director and assist in strategic decision making.

Values as the Bottom Line

Values are the driving force in a nonprofit. The bottom line is the realization of a social mission, not profits. This poses complex problems for the leadership team. How are programs agreed upon, progress monitored, and success measured? How are priorities set and consensus reached? How are staff rewarded and what control systems are applicable? Skilled consultants may be needed from time to time to assist the team in answering these qualitative, value-laden questions and focus on appropriate management systems.

Nonprofit Personnel are Often Highly Diverse

Diversity is reflected, not only by different races and ethnic groups, but ultimately by different values and perspectives. This strong diversity is a major benefit to the nonprofit because input from a wide variety of perspectives usually ensures complete consideration of situations and new ideas. However, nonprofit personnel must ensure they cultivate and remain open to the various values and perspectives.

Problems are Especially Complex for the Small Nonprofit

The majority of nonprofits have small staffs and small budgets, e.g., less than $500,000, which compounds the leadership and management problems they face, especially given their charters and the magnitude
of community needs with which they deal. Those new to nonprofits may react that, because nonprofits tend to be small in size, issues in nonprofits should be simple in nature. On the contrary, the vast majority of organizations (regardless of size) experience similar issues, e.g., challenges in planning, organizing, motivating and guiding. However, when these issues are focused in a small organization, the nature of the organization becomes very dynamic and complex.

Sufficient Resources to Pay Leadership May Be Lacking

With lack of sufficient moneys, attracting and retaining paid management also can be problematic. Hard work with little career development opportunity encourages turnover of chief executives and staff. This can stall the organization’s work. Expertise that is brought in to advise the management may be lost once that leadership leaves.

Lack of Managerial Training is Problematic for the Small Nonprofit

Many nonprofit managers have been promoted primarily out of non-management disciplines and do not have the managerial skills that are needed to run a nonprofit organization. Training and consultation can do much to help these new leaders/managers gain the skills they seek and help them up a myriad of learning curves that rainbow out in front of them.

Chief Executives Wear Too Many Hats

A nonprofit chief executive has to be a current expert in planning, marketing, information management, telecommunications, property management, personnel, finance, systems design, fundraising and
program evaluation. Obviously this is not possible, regardless of size. A larger organization may be able to hire some internal experts, but this is certainly not the case for the smaller organization.

Furthermore, the technology of management progresses today too rapidly for the non-specialist to keep abreast of new thinking and expertise, whatever the size. Outside expertise therefore is often a must for both the large and small organization.

Too Small to Justify or Pay for Expensive Outside Advice

Most nonprofits, even larger ones, often hesitate to spend money on administrative “overhead” such as consultants or other outside experts because this is seen as diverting valuable dollars from direct service. Of course, most nonprofits have no choice. They don’t have enough money to even consider hiring consultants at for-profit rates. Low-cost, volunteer-based assistance often is an appropriate solution.

One-shot Assistance Often is Not Enough

While most consultant organizations want to teach managers “how to fish” rather than give them a “fish,” “fishing” (management skills) is not something that often can be learned in one consultation. Especially in more technical arenas such as computerization, learning comes while grappling with an issue or management problem over a period of time. Building internal management capacity takes more time than a one-shot consultation. Repeat help therefore is not a sign of failure but of growth — a new need to know has surfaced.

Networks are Lacking

Everyone outside the nonprofit sector observes, “Why don’t those chief executives get together more, share more ideas, undertake cooperative ventures?” There are many reasons. First of all, running a successful organization (delivering the quality service that fulfills the organization’s mission) isn’t enough.

Most nonprofit directors run a second business — raising money to support the first. Both are complex and very time-consuming activities, especially when the director wears all the management hats. Second, developing networks or researching joint ventures is time-consuming, expensive and risky.

Nonprofits Usually Have Little Time and Money

Funders do not seem to think research and development activity justifies new expenditures; at least many are hesitant to fund what might not succeed. While nonprofits may be more entrepreneurial than funders, they have little capital to risk. Collaborative planning will be enhanced by computerization and telecommunications, but these investments also are difficult to fund.

In some ways, affordable consultants can substitute for expensive, up-front research and development costs, at least at the feasibility level. In many cases, they can carry an organization through the needed planning to actually develop a new system of collaboration, merger, or automation.

Nonprofits Need Low-Cost Management and Technical Assistance

Nonprofits are valuable community assets that must be effectively managed. The need to provide affordable, accessible management and technical assistance to nonprofit organizations is clear for all the reasons stated above: the complexity of the task, the lack of board and internal expertise, the lack of time and money, changing needs, the learning curve, and, finally the importance of the results to the community. What is well done is based on what is well run.

Typical Nature of Planning in Nonprofits

For most nonprofits, they don’t have a lot of time, money, or resources for sophisticated, comprehensive strategic planning. The focus is usually on the major issues facing the nonprofit and quickly addressing them. Typical major challenges for the facilitator are basic training of personnel about planning concepts and process, helping the nonprofit to focus and sustain its limited resources on planning, ensuring strategies are really strategic rather than operational/efficiency measures, and helping design small and focused planning meetings that produce realistic plans that become implemented.

General Resources


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design

People in the Office

Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Sections of This Article Include


Characteristics of the New Nature of Organizations

New forms of organizations are geared to make organizations more receptive, adaptive and generative — always focused on meeting the needs of stakeholders. New forms of organizations often exhibit the following characteristics:

1. Strong employee involvement
– input to the system starts from those closest to the outcome preferred by the system, from those most in-the-know about whether the organization is achieving its preferred outcomes with its stakeholders or not. This way, the organization stays highly attuned and adaptive to the needs of stakeholders.

2. Organic in nature
– less rules and regulations, sometimes no clear boundaries and always-changing forms

3. Authority based on capability
– ensures the organization remains a means to an end and not an end in itself

4. Alliances -takes advantage of economies of scale, e.g., collaborations, networks, strategic alliances/mergers, etc.

5. Teams – shares activities to take advantage of economies of scale at the lowest levels of activities and ensures full involvement of employees at the lowest levels

6. Flatter, decentralized organizations
– less middle management, resulting in top management exchanging more feedback with those providing products and services; also results in less overhead costs

7. Mindfulness of environments, changes, patterns and themes – priority on reflection and inquiry to learn from experience; develop “learning organizations”

New Organizational Structures and Design

Network Structure

This modern structure includes the linking of numerous, separate organizations to optimize their interaction in order to accomplish a common, overall goal. An example is a joint venture to build a complex, technical systems such as the space shuttle. Another example is a network of construction companies to build a large structure.

Virtual Organization

This emerging form is based on organization members interacting with each other completely, or almost completely, via telecommunications. Members may never actually meet each other. See Virtual Teams

Self-Managed Teams

These teams usually include from 5-15 people and are geared to produce a product or service. Members provide a range of the skills needed to produce the product. The team is granted sufficient authority and access to resources to produce their product in a timely fashion. The hallmark of a self-managed team is that members indeed manage their own group, i.e., they manage access to resources, scheduling, supervision, etc. Team members develop their own process for identifying and rotating members in managerial roles. Often, authority at any given time rests with whomever has the most expertise about the current activity or task in the overall project. Often members are trained in various problem-solving techniques and team-building techniques. These teams work best in environments where the technologies to deliver the product or service are highly complex and the marketplace and organization environments are continually changing. Self-managed teams pose a unique challenge for the traditional manager. It can be extremely difficult for him or her to support empowerment of the self-managed team, taking the risk of letting go of his or her own control.

Learning Organizations

In an environment where environments are continually changing, it’s critical that organizations detect and quickly correct its own errors. This requires continuous feedback to, and within, the organization. Continual feedback allows the organization to `unlearn’ old beliefs and remain open to new feedback, uncolored by long-held beliefs.

In a learning organization, managers don’t direct as much as they facilitate the workers’ applying new information and learning from that experience. Managers ensure time to exchange feedback, to inquire and reflect about the feedback, and then to gain consensus on direction. Peter Senge, noted systems theorist, points out in his book, The Fifth Discipline (Doubleday, 1990, p. 14), that the learning organization is “continually expanding its capacity to create its future … for a learning organization, `adaptive learning’ must be joined by `generative learning,’ learning that enhances our capacity to create.”

Self-Organizing Systems

Self-organizing systems have the ability to continually change their structure and internal processes to conform to feedback with the environment. Some writers use the analogy of biological systems as self-organizing systems. Their ultimate purpose is to stay alive and duplicate. They exist in increasing complexity and adapt their structures and forms to accommodate this complexity. Ultimately, they change structure dramatically to adjust to the outer environment. (Some assert that self-managed groups are self-organizing systems, although others assert that self-managed groups are not because an ultimate purpose is assigned to team members).

A self-organizing system requires a strong current goal or purpose. It requires continual feedback with its surrounding environment. It requires continual reference to a common set of values and dialoguing around these values. It requires continued and shared reflection around the system’s current processes. The manager of this type of organization requires high value on communication and a great deal of patience — and the ability to focus on outcomes rather than outputs. Focus is more on learning than on method.

This Article is in a Series About Understanding Organizational Structures and Design

This article is the eighth in the series which includes:

1. What is an Organization?
2. What Makes Each Organization Unique
3. How They’re the Same: They’re Systems
4. Basic Overview of Life Cycles in Organizations
5. Basic Overview of Organizational Culture
6. Legal Forms and Traditional Structures of Organizations
7. Driving Forces and a New Organizational Paradigm
8. Emerging Nature and New Organizational Structures and Design
9. Basic Guidelines for Organizational Design
10. Wrap Up: Grasping the Big Picture in Organizations (video)


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to New Forms of Organizations

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to New Forms of Organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.

Also consider


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Various Ways to Look at Organizations (Metaphors)

People in a Meeting Sharing Ideas

Various Ways to Look at Organizations (Metaphors)

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Probably everyone in the workplace has their own conception
of what “organization” means. As with most highly complex
terms, everyone is right and everyone is wrong.

The concept of organizational culture
is much like an organizational “personality”. Organizations,
like people, have life cycles.

Many people view organizational
learning
much like we view organisms to be learning. Organizations
can accumulate and manage
knowledge
as well. There are a variety of books that describe
other traits of organizations much like traits of people, e.g.,
depressed organizations, addictive organizations, etc.

One of the most common ways to look at organizations is as
organizational systems. (This is the
view that was used in this library when describing the concept
of an organization.) This view is becoming common among professionals
who study, teach and write about organizations. Practitioners
who work with organizational management to improve organizations
also tend to view organizations as systems. Note that machines,
organisms, persons, groups, families, family dynasties are all
systems, too.

Two people can be looking at the very same organization, but
have completely different perspectives and language about the
same organization. Unless you know the various ways to view organizations,
you’ll miss all the perspectives — you’ll miss the more accurate
truth about the organization you’re studying. You’ll only see
“one view of the elephant — you’ll grab the elephant’s trunk
and think it’s a snake.”
Organizational
Lens — How Different People Can View the Same Organization Very
Differently


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Related Library Topics

Recommended Books