Email Form Submitted
We greatly appreciate your informing us about your experience in using the Library!
We greatly appreciate your informing us about your experience in using the Library!
We greatly appreciate your suggesting links to free resources to include in the Library!
© Copyright Carter
McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC
Although there is a conventional difference between the terms “customer”
and “client,” this topic refers to “customers” as meaning
both. Also, although a product is a tangible offering and a service is an intangible
offering, this topic often refers to “products” as meaning both. The
activities of customer relationship management apply to any type and size of
organization, so the term “organization” refers to that wide variety,
as well. Before reading this topic, you might read about the Relationship
Between Managing Supply Chain, Operations, Quality, Customer Relationships and
Customer Service.
Suggested Pre-Reading
You Are Probably Doing Some CRM Now, But …
What is a CRM System?
What Are the Main Benefits of a CRM?
Types of CRM Functions
Types of CRM Systems
Preparation
1. Clarify Organizational Goals and Measures
2. Align CRM Goals With Organizational Goals
3. Clarify How Customers Will Be Treated Differently
4. Decide What Organizational Design Changes Are
Needed?
5. Select the Best CRM Software
Redesign Your Organization As Needed for CRM
Start Cultivating a CRM Culture
Delegate CRM Goals to Teams and Employees
Train Employees About CRM
Manage Your CRM Teams and Employees
Manage Your CRM Software
Evaluate Your CRM System
Also consider
Customer
Service Management
Operations
Management
Quality Management
Supply
Chain Management
Related Library Topics
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) ensures that the ongoing relationship
between your organization and its customers is always very valuable to everyone
involved. That was easier to do in the past when an organization was expected
to provide a product or service, and the rest was up to the customer.
That has changed dramatically. Today, customers can instantly access opinions
about your organization and its products. Also, they can instantly order products
and services from anyone else around the world.
So before reading the following guidelines and resources in this topic about
CRM, it would be very useful for you to first get some understanding of the
proactive, systematic, high-quality process required to ensure ongoing, great
customer service today.
All About Customer
Service: Overview and Numerous Resources
If you work in an organization, then you are probably already involved in some
form of CRM now. This is true whether your organization serves customers who
are internal or external to your organization, or both.
What do you do now to ensure a great ongoing relationships with your various
customers? For example, how do you keep track of information about them? Highlights
from your conversations? Their feedback about your services? Your plans about
serving them into the future? Schedules of when to contact them and what to
say?
For example, do you have a central database that organizes that information?
Do you use spreadsheets with customer information? Do you resort to using the
contacts list in your phones? Are there multiple people involved in serving
customers? If so, then how do you all ensure you are effectively sharing the
right information at the right times? How are you reminded of when to contact
certain customers and for what purpose?
The answers to those kinds of questions comprise some of your activities in
CRM. CRMs can be implemented and utilized in a rather informal, sporadic and
reactive approach. Or, they can be implemented in a proactively planned and
highly integrated approach. If your organization plans to grow and develop to
the next life
cycle, then you are far better off to use the latter approach. Fortunately,
there are many highly practical and affordable guidelines and tools that can
help you.
A system is a recurring cycle of activities, including:
Thus, a system is a recurring loop of components — in a continuous cycle of
improvement. Customer relationship management is best done as a system; otherwise,
the management tends to be highly reactive and sporadic, often resulting in
a patchwork of disconnected and ineffective activities.
The purpose of a CRM system is to take a recurring, comprehensive and systematic
approach to ensuring a mutually fulfilling relationship between your organization
and all of its customers. The system works with any type and size of organization
that has customers, whether internal, external or both. Here are two additional
perspectives:
The CRM guides and supports customers through the various phases of the customer
relationship phases, as well as the phases in the sales pipeline.
The Three
Phases of CRM
Five
Customer Relationship Stages for Full Engagement
The more you understand your customers — their types
and needs,
what they value,
their activities with your organization — then the more likely they will remain
loyal to your organization. Here is a list of some of the overall benefits of
a CRM system:
If yours is a small or medium-sized organization, then you might be mistakenly
thinking that a CRM system is much too complex and expensive for your organization.
If so, then you might benefit from reading this article.
Top
Five Myths About CRM Debunked
The CRM system works by pulling together information about your customers from
a variety of different sources that you specify in order to automate:
By automating these functions with CRM software, you can organize information
from your documents, notes, phone calls, emails, chats and forums. You can program
some CRM software to monitor certain social media tools to notice comments regarding
your organization and its products and services.
Thus, CRM systems can give you a clear picture of each of your customers to
help you cultivate a strong relationship with each as you support them through
the customer
life cycle.
When considering which type of CRM system might be best for your organization,
it helps to consider from among three main types including the following. You
will notice that they correspond closely to the above-mentioned types of CRM
functions.
CRM
Types
Operational,
Analytical, Collaborative
An Introduction
to Different Types of CRM Systems
What
is CRM? 3 Types of Customer Relationship Management
Now, before you plan and implement your CRM system, is the best time to consider
the types of problems that can occur — not later on when you are in the middle
of trying to operate the system, while also trying to resolve problems in how
it is operating.
Why CRM Fails
Top 5 CRM
Software Pitfalls
Avoid the
Four Perils of CRM
Why
CRM Projects Fail & How To Avoid These Pitfalls
Top
10 CRM Implementation Pitfalls
The planning and implementation of a CRM system requires sufficient time, energy
and expertise, as well as a variety of different perspectives. That means a
well-qualified and designed CRM Team of the most suitable members from your organization.
The CRM Team would make recommendations to management about, for example:
It is best to draft a job description for the CRM Team to be used when explaining
the CRM Team’s role to upper management and suggesting who should be on it.
The description also gives guidance and direction to the CRM Team as it is doing
its job.
It is often best, as well, to train the members of the CRM Team about CRM. It might
be useful to hire an expert to do that training, as well as to being a resource
to the CRM Team as it does its job.
How
to Build the Perfect CRM Implementation Team
How
To Structure Your CRM Implementation Team
5 Important People
You Absolutely Need for CRM Success
Also see
Hiring
Consultants
Team
Building
Team
Performance Management
Here are some excellent articles that can give you and your CRM Team a good impression
of what is generally involved in planning and developing your CRM system. You
might read them in this order from general to more specific:
Top
4 CRM Implementation Considerations
How to Complete
a CRM Implementation in 5 Steps
How
to Create a CRM Strategy in 7 Steps
What are the organization’s overall goals regarding its sales, customers and
service? For example, are they to increase sales revenue, expand marketshare,
increase customer retention and/or reduce customer complaints? What is your
unique
value proposition to sell your products and services to different groups
of customers? What is your unique
selling proposition that separates you from your customers?
Strategic Planning
How to Do to Planning
Goals
and Objectives Should Be SMARTER
Define the CRM goals needed to help achieve the strategic goals. For example,
should you focus more efforts on various preferred groups of customers, such
as the most profitable customers, new customers, current customers and/or reducing
their complaints? As much as possible, associate the necessary SMART
objectives needed to implement each CRM goal. It is helpful to articulate a
fictional customer profile, or persona,
to most easily consider the nature of each group of customers.
When deciding CRM goals, it is often useful to consider various metrics, or
measures of progress, for a CRM system. The metrics themselves can become goals
to achieve.
The
CRM Metrics: How to Measure the Performance of CRM
How
to Measure CRM Success
CRM
Metrics: What Should You Monitor and Measure?
Also see
Action
Planning and Operational Planning
Strategic
Action Plans & Alignment
How can you best evolve each preferred group through the sales pipeline, while
maintaining strong customer relationships and services? For example, should
you sell directly to them or use a distributor? For each group, should you start
or enhance a call center, up-sell or cross-sell, focus on certain types of discounts
and/or improve quality management? Also, what are the most appropriate communications
channels for each preferred group?
All About Sales
How to Work With Others
A conventional rule in deciding the structure of something is “form follows
function.” In other words, the structure of the organization (its design
and roles) should be to what is most useful in implementing the organization’s
functions (its goals and methods to achieve those goals).
So what departments, teams and employees are now — and should be — involved
in dealing with customers, for examples, sales, marketing and customer service?
What roles are now — and should be — involved in using the CRM system, including
its software? What goals should each department, team and various employees
have in customer relationship management? What SMART objectives should be associated
with each goal?
Organizational
Structures and Design
Requirements
for Successful Organizational Change
In this type, you install the CRM software on your computer system, as well
as maintaining, troubleshooting and updating the software. You would either
use one of the free CRM tools (listed later on below) or buy or license a tool
from a vendor.
This type of software installation works best if you have available ongoing
technical skills for installation, troubleshooting and upgrades. You also will
need considerably more time to install the software as you climb the often steep
learning curve to understand the software and its installation. You are likely
to face occasional periods of downtime of the software as problems are solved
and upgrades are installed.
In this type, you subscribe or license the software from a vendor that makes
the software available to one or more people in your organization, depending
on the licensing agreement. The vendor manages all aspects of the software,
including installation, testing, training, troubleshooting and upgrades. This
works if you have a suitable budget. Fortunately, the price of CRM software
has continued to decrease over the years.
Itarian
lists a variety of questions to consider, including:
You should also consider:
Now you are ready to specify what you want the CRM software to accomplish for
you. It is best to write a software requirements specification (SRS), while
focusing now on the needs of your organization, and not on the particular software
tool that you might already prefer. Later on, you will take your SRS to the
various CRM software vendors for you to carefully decide if their software will
indeed meet your organization’s needs.
How
to Create an SRS for CRM
CRM Software
Requirements for Your Business
How
to Define Your CRM Software Requirements
CRM
Requirements Example Document
Five
Levels of CRM Requirements
Specify
Your CRM Requirements
Free CRM Software
7 Best Free and
Open Source CRM Software Options
How
Can You Use Gmail as CRM Tool?
Evernote
The Free CRM With Something
for Everyone
Best Free CRM Software
for Business in 2019
Free CRM for Small Business
Fee-Based Software
CRM Software
Best CRM Software
2019: Comparison & Reviews
The 25 Best CRM Apps
for Every Business
CRM Tools
Customer
Relationship Management Software
For Small Organizations
“Most of the businesses out there will choose a CRM software to measure
the performance of their strategy. The good news in selecting a CRM Software,
is most of the complexity has been taken out of the process now. The best CRM
software solutions include SaaS (software as a service delivered online), and
innovations in this area improve everyday. This means there is no longer a costly
need of an in-house IT team and server space. At least this will be the case
for 97% of all businesses with less than 10 employees.” Thinkaboutcrm
For Nonprofits
Nonprofits can also use CRM software, for example, for tracking clients, program
outcomes, funders, results of fundraising, volunteers, memberships and their
membership levels.
How to
Choose the Best CRM for Your Nonprofit
6
Awesome Nonprofit CRM Options for Your Organization
Top
Nonprofit CRM Software
You are in a great position now to begin working with various vendors to get
the best software to meet your needs, as specified in your SRS. You might include
your specification in an overall Request for Proposal (RFP). You also might
bring the members of your Implementation Team with you when talking to the vendors.
Your
Definitive CRM Selection Guide and Checklist
How
to Choose Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Software
Choosing
CRM Software
23
Tips for Choosing the Right CRM Software
A
Step-By-Step Guide To Selecting The Right CRM Software
CRM
Vendor Evaluation Matrix
A
CRM Evaluation Checklist: What Should You Look For?
A
CRM RFP Guide and Template for Creating the Perfect Proposal
Also see
4
Reasons Business Contracts Fall Apart
US
Business Contracts
Consider the goals and objectives that you established during the CRM planning
for each department, team and employee associated with customer relationship
management. What teams and roles should exist? How should they be integrated
with each other? For example, which departments, teams and employees should
be collaborating with each other and how? What organizational design would best
facilitate that type of involvement and collaboration?
Understanding Organizational
Structures and Design
Work
Design and Job Design
Organizing
or Reorganizing an Organization and Its Employees
How to Know What
Positions and Jobs Are Needed
Research shows that long-lasting, successful change in an organization usually
requires a change in its culture. Unless the culture begins to change, it does
not matter how much advice and many tools that the organization gets. A change
in culture will determine whether they are actually used or not.
Great customer relationship management is a mindset. It is a way of thinking,
prioritizing and planning about customer relations in an organization. It guides
how decisions are made and how problems are solved regarding customer relations.
When many people in an organization have that mindset, then the organization
has a CRM culture.
CRM
Culture – How to Bring CRM Culture Successfully?
10
Steps to Implementing a CRM Culture in the Organization
Creating
a CRM Culture
Also see
Cultural
Change
Planning
Team Building
Consider the CRM goals and associated objectives that you decided during the
planning. Which goals should be delegated to which teams and employees? Make
sure that you make the assignments according to the team performance management
and employee performance management practices that are formally established
in your personnel policies.
Goal
Setting with Employees — What Should Employees Work On?
Team
Performance Management: Performance Planning Phase (Assigning Goals)
Also see
Personnel
Policies
It is critical that all employees have a mindset of great customer relationships,
especially as a result of having great relationships with customers. The relationship
requires skills customer service, including in building
trust, having empathy
for others, listening,
asking thoughtful questions
and sharing feedback.
Training also includes how to use the CRM software, for example, its purpose,
how to use it, how it integrates with other computer systems, and where to get
help. Good CRM software should come with ample documentation about how to use
it. If you licensed or bought the software, the vendor will very likely have
time-tested training and materials to use.
Keep
It Simple: Training New Employees on the CRM System
How
to Train Your Staff for CRM
The Importance
of Training in CRM Success
Also see
About
Training and Development
Also see
Cultural
Change
Planning
Team Building
You have already done the phases of setting goals and delegating them to the
appropriate teams and employees. Remaining tasks are to monitor and measure
progress toward those goals, implement performance improvement methods where
needed, and reward/compensate teams and employees accordingly.
For teams:
Team
Performance Management: Performance Appraisal / Evaluation
Team
Performance Management: Development (Improvement) Planning Phase
For employees:
Giving
and Receiving Feedback
Evaluating
Performance (Performance Appraisals)
Rewarding
Performance
Addressing
Performance Problems
Performance
Improvement/Development Plans
Firing
Employees
Ensure all necessary collaborations are occurring among teams and stakeholders,
for example, cross-collaboration between marketing, sales and customer service
activities.
Monitor and evaluate the achievement of team and employee CRM-related goals,
and report the progress toward achieving the organizational and CRM goals.
Also see
What
is Supervision? How Do I Supervise?
The management activities specific to the CRM system include, for example to:
Evaluations should monitor various metrics, or measures, to decide how well
the CRM system is operating. (Various metrics were listed above in the section
2. Align CRM Goals With Organizational Goals .)
Evaluations should especially be in regard to measuring the extent of achievement
of the CRM goals that you had established for your customer service management
system.
Be sure to use the learning from your evaluation activities to improve the
next round of the planning of your CRM system. In that way, you are indeed treating
your CRM as a recurring system of integrated and tightly aligned activities.
Also see
How
to Design Successful Evaluation and Assessment Plans
CRM Glossary
CRM Definitions and Glossary
Customer Service Institute of America
International Customer Service Association
National Customer Service Association
North
American Customer Service Management Association
SOCAP International
In addition to the articles on this current page, also see the following blog
that has posts related to Customer Service and Satisfaction. Scan down the blog’s
page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts”
in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a
post in the blog. The blog also links to numerous free related resources.
Library’s
Customer Service Blog
To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may
want to review some related topics, available from the link below.
Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.
Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been
selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.
© Copyright Michael Nayor
There are many types of issues facing businesses, but what counts as a true crisis?
It’s not always immediately apparent when your organization is in the initial stages of a crisis. To this effect, I am pleased to bring you a guest blog submission by Michael Nayor, founder and CEO of crisis consulting firm The Rhodell Group, that investigates “What Really Constitutes a Business Crisis.”
A business crisis can be anything that can negatively effect a company’s reputation or bottom line. Many events at first blush may not appear to be serious. HP’s firing of Mark Hurd and the subsequent entanglement with Oracle was not a big deal in the scheme of things, even though internally it must have been a shocker. However, the death or resignation of a key person in any organization could very well be serious for any company depending on just how key that person really was. Natural catastrophes, product recalls, labor disputes, computer data losses. The list is endless. Some are temporary. Some can cause the demise of a company. Most can be handled with honesty and the realization that it may be necessary to absorb losses over the short haul in order to achieve a long and healthy business life.
Two distinct categories of crisis need to be recognized. In one we lump all those events over which we have no control, such as product tampering by outside forces or natural disasters. Even in these situations there are always some actions we can take: tamper-proof packaging, liability insurance, proper protocols. But generally these events can blind-side us.
The second category contains all those events that might have been avoided had we chosen to take the actions necessary to protect ourselves and the public. Some are obvious. We look at the BP oil spill and see things that surely could have been done. Other events are not so obvious and these are the ones that can be insidious. When a management believes it is doing the right thing but in fact is fueling a potential crisis we have the makings of a catastrophe. A couple of examples will make this abundantly clear.
Market share is usually very important to a company, oddly sometimes more important than the bottom line. There is always great competition for new customers. Many times the efforts and resources devoted to advertising, marketing and selling to new customers are at the expense of a company’s loyal customer base. This can even be seen at the local level. Where I live heating oil companies consistently offer new customers a deal for the first year in order to lure them in. This, of course, is done at the expense of old, loyal customers who have to make up the slack. The result is that many savvy oil customers these days do a lot of shopping each year to find the best deal. Loyalty is a thing of the past. On a national level the problem has gotten even more serious. A recent financial story in The New Yorker last month observed that there is almost universal recognition that customer service in this country has deteriorated. Such service is considered a “cost”. Companies are looking for the customers they don’t have so they are willing to spend on marketing and advertising but are not as interested in adding to their costs of service. The article made it sound a little like cynical dating. Companies are interested in luring you in but then once they have you, they don’t quite value you as much as the next potential customer they want to corral.
Lack of service is not just a pain for helpless consumers. In this internet age they can do something about it. This is how a company can sow the seeds of its own destruction, and inexorably create its own crisis. Companies and their products and services are being rated on the internet and consumers don’t hold back. They tell it like it is. Granted, competitors may be planting some of these negative comments but for the most part product and service evaluations are being taken at face value. The moral of the story: be faithful to those who brought you to the dance, or the consequences could be severe.
Whether in politics, professional sports, or in business, “players” still believe that because of their importance they can ride out any issue or problem. They can’t. We can all easily tick off a dozen or so examples, but the latest is surprising. Johnson & Johnson has recently gone through a spate of recalls of tainted children’s Tylenol and Motrin. The Company has generally kept a low profile and even contracted with a third party to buy up Motrin off retail shelves rather than announce an actual recall. And for the last decade it has been settling with claimants for a variety of injuries and death allegedly due from Ortho Evra, a contraceptive patch made by its subsidiary, Ortho McNeil. It appears clear that the current management of J&J has not followed in the footsteps of the management that handled the Tylenol crisis of 1982 which is often cited as the quintessential example of crisis management in modern corporate history. Back then cyanide had been found in bottles of Tylenol in the Chicago area. J&J immediately issued public warnings, issued a product recall, created tamper-proof packaging, and before long was back in business. The Company was up-front and willing to bite the bullet in the best interests of the public. Unfortunately that does not appear to be the philosophy today. There is clearly a danger in believing one’s invincibility. The trust and respect of the public is at stake, and once lost, is very difficult to retrieve.
A crisis is not just the obvious explosion at a plant or a mine. Companies can and do create their own crises. Companies must evaluate their philosophy, their strategy and their honesty. They must take action to minimize their vulnerabilities but at the same time be prepared to take action in the best interests of the public if they value company longevity.
To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.
Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.
Also consider
In addition to the articles on this current page, also see the following blogs that have posts related to Crisis Management. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog. The blog also links to numerous free related resources.
By Jonathan L. Bernstein (Update � 2016 by Jonathan Bernstein. All rights reserved.)
Crisis: Any situation that is threatening or could threaten to harm people or property, seriously interrupt business, significantly damage reputation and/or negatively impact the bottom line.
Every organization is vulnerable to crises. The days of playing ostrich – burying your head in the sand and hoping the problem goes away – are gone. You can try, but your stakeholders will not be understanding or forgiving because they’ve watched what happened with Volkswagen, Chipotle, FIFA, and Lance Armstrong.
If you don’t prepare, you will incur more damage. When I look at existing crisis management-related plans while conducting a vulnerability audit (the first step in crisis preparedness), what I often find is a failure to address the many communications issues related to crisis or disaster response. Experience demonstrates that organizational leadership often does not understand that in the absence of adequate internal and external communications:
The basic steps of effective crisis communications are not difficult, but they require advance work in order to minimize damage. So if you’re serious about crisis preparedness and response, read and implement these 10 steps of crisis communications, the first seven of which can and should be undertaken before any crisis occurs.
If you’re being proactive and preparing for crises, gather your Crisis Communications Team for intensive brainstorming sessions on all the potential crises that could occur at your organization.
There are at least two immediate benefits to this exercise:
In some cases, of course, you know a crisis will occur because you’re planning to create it – e.g., to lay off employees, or to make a major acquisition.
There is a more formal method of gathering this information I call a “vulnerability audit,” about which information is available here.
This assessment process should lead to creating a Crisis Response Plan that is an exact fit for your organization, one that includes both operational and communications components. The remaining steps, below, outline some of the major topics that should be addressed in the communications section of the plan.
A small team of senior executives should be identified to serve as your organization’s Crisis Communications Team. Ideally, the organization’s CEO will lead the team, with the firm’s top public relations executive and legal counsel as his or her chief advisers. If your in-house PR executive does not have sufficient crisis communications expertise, he or she may choose to retain an agency or independent
consultant with that specialty. Other team members are typically the heads of your major organizational divisions, as any situation that rises to the level of being a crisis will affect your entire organization. And sometimes, the team also needs to include those with special knowledge related to the current crisis, e.g., subject-specific experts.
Let me say a word about legal counsel. Historically, I used to have to do a lot of arm-wresting with attorneys over strategy and messaging. They were focused strictly on the court of law and, of course, a crisis manager is focused primarily on the court of public opinion. More and more lawyers understand that the organization in crisis can be destroyed in the court of public opinion years before the legal process plays out. And attorneys have also come to understand that, while “no comment” translates as “we’re guilty or hiding something” to the public, there are a lot of ways to say very little without compromising legal matters, while still appearing responsive to those seeking more information.
Remember this – entire countries and causes have had their ambitions thwarted, or aided, as a consequence of their trials in the court of public opinion.
Categorically, any organization should ensure, via appropriate policies and training, that only authorized spokespersons speak for it. This is particularly important during a crisis. Each crisis communications team should have people who have been pre-screened, and trained, to be the lead and/or backup spokespersons for different channels of communications.
All organizational spokespersons during a crisis situation must have:
The Right Skills
I’ve met senior-level corporate executives who could stand up in front of a 1,000-person conference audience without a fear and perform beautifully – but who would get virtual lockjaw when they knew a camera was pointed their way for a one-on-one interview.
I’ve also known very effective written communicators who should probably never do spoken interviews because they’re way too likely to “step in it” using that format. These days, spokesperson responsibilities invariably include online communication, and social media is a very easy place to make a mistake.
Matching potential spokespersons’ skills with their assignments as a member of the Crisis Communications Team is critical.
The Right Position
Some spokespersons may naturally excel at all forms of crisis communications – traditional media, social media, B2B, internal, etc. Others may be more limited. Only certain types of highly sensitive crises (e.g., ones involving significant loss of life) virtually mandate the chief executive be the lead spokesperson unless there is very good cause to the contrary.
The fact is that some chief executives are brilliant organizational leaders but not very effective in-person communicators. The decision about who should speak is made after a crisis breaks – but the pool of potential spokespersons should be identified and trained in advance.
Not only are spokespersons needed for media communications, but for all types and forms of communications, internal and external. This includes on-camera, at a public meeting, at employee meetings, etc. You really don’t want to be making decisions about so many different types of spokespersons while “under fire.”
Two typical quotes from well-intentioned executives summarize the reason why your spokespersons should receive professional training in how to speak to the media:
“I talked to that nice reporter for over an hour and he didn’t use the most important news about my organization.”
“I’ve done a lot of public speaking. I won’t have any trouble at that public hearing.”
Regarding the first example, there have hundreds of people skewered by CBS’ “60 Minutes” or ABC’s “20/20” who thought they knew how to talk to the press. In the second case, most executives who have attended a hostile public hearing have gone home wishing they had been wearing a pair of Depends. They didn’t learn, in advance, the critical differences between proactive PR, which focuses on promoting your organization, and crisis communications, which focuses on preserving your organization.
All stakeholders, internal and external, are just as capable of misunderstanding or misinterpreting information about your organization as the media. It’s your responsibility to minimize the chance of that happening.
Spokesperson training teaches you to be prepared, to be ready to respond in a way that optimizes the response of all stakeholders.
Notification Systems
Remember when the only way to reach someone quickly was by a single phone or fax number, assuming they were there to receive either?
Today, we need to have – immediately at hand – the means to reach our internal and external stakeholders using multiple modalities. Many of us have several phone numbers, more than one email address, and can receive SMS (text) messages or faxes. Instant Messenger programs, either public or proprietary, are also very popular for business and personal use. We can even send audio and video messages via email. And then, of course, there is social media. This may be the best/fastest way to reach some of our stakeholders, but setting up social media accounts for this purpose and developing a number of followers/friends/contacts on the various social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+) is not something you can do after a crisis breaks, because nowhere does news of a crisis spread faster and more out of your control than on social media.
Depending on how “techie” we choose to be, all of this type of communication – and more – may be received on or sent by a single device!
It is absolutely essential, pre-crisis, to establish notification systems that will allow you to rapidly reach your stakeholders using multiple modalities. The Virginia Tech campus shooting catastrophe, where email was the sole means of alerting students initially, proves that using any single modality can make a crisis worse. Some of us may be on email constantly, others not so. Some of us receive our cellphone calls or messages quickly, some not. If you use more than one modality to reach your stakeholders, the chances are much greater that the message will go through.
For a long time, those of us in crisis management relied on the old-fashioned “phone tree” and teams of callers to track people down. Fortunately, today there is technology – offered by multiple vendors for rent or purchase – that can be set up to automatically start contacting all stakeholders in your pre-established database and keep trying to reach them until they confirm (e.g., by pressing a certain number on a phone keypad) that the message has been received. Technology you can trigger with a single call or email.
Monitoring Systems
Intelligence gathering is an essential component of both crisis prevention and crisis response.
Knowing what’s being said about you on social media, in traditional media, by your employees, customers, and other stakeholders often allows you to catch a negative “trend” that, if unchecked, turns into a crisis.
Likewise, monitoring feedback from all stakeholders during a crisis situation allows you to accurately adapt your strategy and tactics.
Both require monitoring systems be established in advance. For traditional and social media, Google Alerts are the no-cost favorite, but there are also free social media tracking apps such as Hootsuite. There a variety of paid monitoring services that provide not only monitoring, but also the ability to report results in a number of formats. Monitoring other stakeholders means training personnel who have front-line contact with stakeholders (e.g., Customer Service) to report what they’re hearing or seeing to decision-makers on your Crisis Communications Team.
Who are the internal and external stakeholders that matter to your organization? I consider employees to be your most important audience, because every employee is a PR representative and crisis manager for your organization whether you want them to be or not! But, ultimately, all stakeholders will be talking about you to others not on your contact list, so it’s up to you to ensure that they receive the messages you would like them to repeat elsewhere.
While full message development must await the outbreak of an actual crisis, “holding statements,” messages designed for use immediately after a crisis breaks, can be developed in advance to be used for a wide variety of scenarios to which the organization is perceived to be vulnerable, based on the assessment you conducted in Step 1 of this process. An example of holding statements by a hotel chain with properties hit by a natural disaster, before the organization’s headquarters has any hard factual information, might be:
“We have implemented our crisis response plan, which places the highest priority on the health and safety of our guests and staff.”
“Our thoughts are with those who were in harm’s way, and we hope that they are well.” “We will be supplying additional information when it is available and posting it on our website.”
The organization’s Crisis Communications Team should regularly review holding statements to determine if they require revision and/or whether statements for other scenarios should be developed.
Reacting without adequate information is a classic “shoot first and ask questions afterwards” situation in which you could be the primary victim. However, if you’ve done all of the above first, it’s a “simple” matter of having the Crisis Communications Team on the receiving end of information coming in from your team members, ensuring the right type of information is being provided so you can proceed with determining the appropriate response.
Assessing the crisis situation is, therefore, the first crisis communications step you can’t take in advance. If you haven’t prepared in advance, your reaction will be delayed by the time it takes your in-house staff or quickly hired consultants to run through steps 1 to 7. Furthermore, a hastily created crisis communications strategy and team are never as efficient as those planned and rehearsed in advance.
With holding statements available as a starting point, the Crisis Communications Team must continue developing the crisis-specific messages required for any given situation. The team already knows, categorically, what type of information its stakeholders are looking for. What should those stakeholders know about this crisis? Keep it simple. Have no more than three main messages that go to all stakeholders and, as necessary, some audience-specific messages for individual groups of stakeholders. You’ll need to adapt your messaging to different forms of media as well. For example, crisis messaging on Twitter often relies on sharing links to an outside page where a longer message is displayed, a must because of the platform’s 140 character limit.
After the cowpies are no longer interacting with the air-circulating device, the question must be asked, “What did we learn from this?”
A formal analysis of what was done right, what was done wrong, what could be done better next time and how to improve various elements of crisis preparedness is another must-do activity for any Crisis Communications Team. I have developed a formal process for accomplishing this, but even a solid in- house brainstorming session can do the job.
When a healthy organization’s CEO or CFO looks at the cost of preparing a crisis communications plan, either a heavy investment of in-house time or retention of an outside professional for a substantial fee, it is tempting for them to fantasize “it can’t happen to us” or “if it happens to us, we can handle it relatively easily.”
Hopefully, that type of ostrich emulation is rapidly becoming a thing of the past. Yet I know when all is said and done, thousands of organizations hit by natural and man-made disasters will have suffered far more damage than would have occurred with a fully developed crisis communications plan in place. This has also been painfully true for scores of clients I have served over the past 30+ years. Even the best crisis management professional is playing catch up – with more damage occurring all the time – when the organization has no crisis communications infrastructure already in place.
I would like to believe organizations worldwide are finally “getting it” about crisis preparedness, whether we’re talking about crisis communications, disaster response or business continuity. Certainly, client demand for advance preparation has increased dramatically in the past decade, at least for my consultancy. But I fear there is, in fact, little change in what I have said in the past – that 95 percent of American organizations remain either completely unprepared or significantly under-prepared for crises. And my colleagues overseas report little better, and sometimes worse, statistics.
Choose to be part of the prepared minority. Your stakeholders will appreciate it!
The following links are to a wide variety of guidelines for successful crisis management that will avoid crisis management mess. Many of the articles include real-life examples of success.
Also consider
Copyright Jonathan L. Bernstein
As it stands today, crisis management is very much entwined with social media. Whether you like it or not, when trouble hits you’ve got to quickly meet your stakeholders in the places they frequent in order to maintain control of your story, and that means being ready. In an article for business2community.com,
David Vap provided some solid tips for getting your organization in position to handle social crises:
I especially like this list because of step two, “create a new social mindset in your organization.” Far too many businesses create social media accounts and install fancy managing programs but neglect proper training and education, not only stifling possible gains but also creating the risk of improper use, which raises the chance of crisis even further.
One of the best ways to learn is from the mistakes of others. The following links are to many examples of crisis management done poorly.
Also consider
To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.
Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.
© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.
NOTE: There can be very different styles in going through this project termination phase, ranging from a carefully specified and sequential set of activities to an unfolding and non-sequential arrangement. See the very Different Approaches in Consulting. For the sake of being highly informative with clear and well organized information, this topic will explain a rather orderly, but highly collaborative approach to project termination.
(This phase is sometimes referred to as the Separation Phase.)
See a video about project termination, including reasons to terminate, ethical considerations, legally terminating and managing relationships. From the Consultants Development Institute. |
The purpose of this phase of the consulting process is to ensure there is an
effective termination of the project. The activities of project termination
are very important to address even if the client asserts that the project has
been successful and suggests that no further activities are needed. The activities recognize key learnings from the project, acknowledge the client’s development, formalizes the end of the project, and identifies next steps for you and your client. It helps to avoid “project creep” where the project seems
to never end because the requirements for success keep expanding. It also helps to avoid an unethical dependency of the client on the relationship with you.
Reasons Why Success Might Not Have Been Achieved
It is during this phase that you and your client should begin the process of separating from the consulting relationship – the relationship in which your client relied on you for guidance and materials to address the same type of problem that had occurred in their workplace. However, even if you had successfully helped your client to solve the problem and to adopt new practices and structures into their organization, then sometimes the client continues to ask you for additional assistance.
It may be because the client is consciously or unconsciously taking advantage of your expertise as long as it seems that you are still involved in the project. So the client might continue to add requirements to the original contract. This is called “project creep”. In that situation, it is very important to specify that you both should redo the contracting phase to generate a new contract or formally modify the existing contract in order to accommodate the new requirements from the client.
Or, the client might want to remain in some kind of relationship with you, personal or otherwise. So the client might suggest one or two new projects in which you could consult even if they do not require your particular expertise. That is called a client dependency on the consultant and it is highly unethical for the consultant to cultivate.
In that situation, if you do indeed have the expertise to help the client with the one or two new projects, then specify that you both should do the contracting phase for each of them. Otherwise, it would be unethical for you to contract to deliver services in which you have very little, if any, expertise to offer.
Regardless of the reasons for termination of the contract, you should formally terminate the project with a letter to your client. This practice is too often forgotten, yet it is meaningful to ensure that you and your client clearly recognize that the project has indeed been terminated. In a written document that is dated and signed to the client:
Include the following sentence: “If you do not agree with all of the contents of this document, then please respond in writing to me with your reasoning and within two weeks of the date on this document.” (This is not legal advice.) That useful phrase might protect you at some time in the future if your client ever decides that your project was not successful, after all.
Description
Goals for This Project Evaluation Phase
Some Evaluation Questions to Consider When Doing a
Results Evaluation
Reasons Why Success Might Not Have Been Achieved
When Clients Are Reluctant to Do Final Evaluation
If Desired Results Are Still Not Achieved, Cycle Back?
Some Useful Resources and Skills for This Phase
Also See These Closely Related Topics
All About Consulting
– Types, Skills and Approaches
Collaborative
Consulting for Performance, Change and Learning
Guidelines
and Resources for Contracting Phase of Consulting
Guidelines
and Resources for Discovery Phase of Consulting
Guidelines
and Resources for Action Planning Phase of Consulting
Guidelines
and Resources for Implementation Phase of Consulting
NOTE: There can be very different styles in going through this project evaluation
phase, ranging from a carefully specified and sequential set of activities to
an unfolding and nonsequential arrangement. See the very Different
Approaches in Consulting. For the sake of being highly informative with
clear and well organized information, this topic will explain a rather orderly,
but highly collaborative approach to project evaluation.
(This phase is sometimes referred to as the Evaluation and Adoption Phase,
although some practitioners separate the Adoption phase and consider it to be
focused especially on ensuring the client has adopted the new practices needed
to solve the client’s problem — and learned how to solve similar problems into
the future.)
See a video about project evaluation, including overcoming barriers, benefits of evaluation, evaluation planning, questions to ask and responses to results. From the Consultants Development Institute. |
By now, you and your client have made a consistent and focused attempt to implement
the action plans (perhaps combined into an Implementation Plan). The primary
purpose of this phase is to assess whether success was achieved in the project.
Success
is usually defined during the contracting
phase and sometimes at the end of the discovery
phase after recommendations have been approved by the client. The purpose
also is to ensure that your client’s organization has adopted the new
approaches and practices to avoid or manage similar situations in the future.
This is the phase of the consulting process that really pays off if you have
been working collaboratively with your client.
When projects do not achieve success, it is often one or more of the following
reasons:
Surprisingly, it can be a major challenge to get the client to undergo a final
evaluation of the results of the project, especially if it already seems clear
that the project has been successful. When that happens, consider the following
guidelines.
If, after having conducted most or all of the project evaluation, it is clear
that success has not been achieved, then consider the following guidelines.
The upcoming project
termination phase shares ideas when it seems the project needs to be terminated.
The
Evaluation of Organization Development Interventions: An Empirical Study
Best
Practice in Organization Development Evaluation
How to Measure
the Intervention Process?
Thinking
Differently about evaluating OD interventions
Evaluating
Organization Development Interventions
A
Framework To Evaluate Consulting Efforts
How to
Design Successful Evaluation and Assessment Plans
Basic
Guide to Program Evaluation (use to conduct evaluations during and at the end
of the project)
Evaluation Activities
in Organizations (all kinds)
Guidelines
and Resources for Termination Phase of Consulting
Overview
of the Field of Organization Development
Guidelines, Methods and Resources for Organizational Change Agents
Competencies
and Resources for Organizational Change Agents