Four Ways to Lie – Required Reading for Vatican Officials

Speak truth written on wooden cubes

My clients, and my kids, have been told that there are four ways that they can be perceived as lying:

  1. Dishonesty by commission — literally saying black is white.
  2. Dishonesty by omission — leaving important information out of your communications.
  3. Dishonesty by understatement for the purpose of obfuscating the truth.
  4. Dishonesty by overstatement for the purpose of obfuscating the truth.

We have all been witnessing — first in the Church’s initial communication and handling of sexual abuses by priests in the United States, now by the Church’s bungling of what seems to be an even worse situation in Europe — dishonesty in all four categories.

There was a time when, to the vast majority of Christians, not just to Catholics, the word of the Vatican equated to the word of God, and even non-Christians had great respect for most statements coming out of the Vactican. But in the 21st Century, “consumers” are too savvy to believe that God directed his representatives on Earth to lie. The Vatican must put down the proverbial shovel before it digs its way to a place much less inviting than Heaven.

——————————-
For more resources, see the Free Management Library topic: Crisis Management
——————————-

Mission Impact: The One Bottom Line

A group of business men and women working on mission of the company

For centuries there was only one bottom line: profitability. Then people and companies interested in making the world a better place, not just making money, decided social impact should have equal billing. Fair enough. A bit later, environmental impact demanded a place at the table, so now we have three bottom lines. And from that the vibrant corporate social responsibility (CSR) movement emerged that in many ways has changed the way Wall Street, and even Main Street, does its business, or at least talks about the business it does.

The social enterprise movement has also generally incorporated that three bottom line perspective. Consider the definition we’re using here: “harnessing the power of the marketplace to solve critical social or environment problems.”

But I would argue that there really is only one bottom line that matters for a social enterprise. That’s the social impact as it relates to the mission of that organization. Sure, the venture has to be financially successful, even sustainable to use the current buzzword (for which I’m still searching for a meaningful definition; do you have one?), but without mission impact, there isn’t anything there. Or, to put it differently, as we point out to the nonprofits we work with, only go down this path to expand your organization’s mission impact. For social enterprise, making money is just a means to that higher end.

So while we’ll spend a fair amount of time talking about strategies for generating that revenue, which at times can be all-consuming, we’ll need to keep our eyes on the prize. For social enterprises, mission matters. Ultimately it’s the only thing that does.

10 Tips for SEO Reputation Management

[Guest Submission by Chesa Keane, continuation of theme from previous blog post]

  1. Focus on Google for search results; the other search engines will follow suit over time.
  2. Review your website for keyword placement and density (keyword/total word ratio); you won’t be found if the keywords are not present in the proper configuration (i.e. there are requirements for the number of keywords used in different parts of the code that creates the page).
  3. Update your website frequently; stale sites drop fast and fresh information keeps your site sticky (viewers stay and return).
  4. Present clear calls-to-action; give your visitor a reason to respond.
  5. Validate your web pages for error-free code; Google will downgrade poorly constructed websites.
  6. Content must be relevant to both the website and the web page.
  7. Avoid Flash content and frames pages; these websites cannot be reliably indexed.
  8. Obtain inbound links from relevant, high-profile websites with good PageRank.
  9. Create multiple points-of-presence (e.g., blogs, article publication, activity at forums, social media), where you can get as many positive messages out as possible, pushing the negative messages down on a search engine results page.
  10. Monitor your results constantly and adapt quickly based on the results.

——————————-
For more resources, see the Free Management Library topic: Crisis Management
——————————-

Chesa Keane, principal of Reno, Nevada-based TAO Consultants, Inc., has been offering web design and search engine optimization (SEO) advice since 1995, soon after the advent of the modern World Wide Web. She is Bernstein Crisis Management’s preferred provider of SEO Reputation Management services.

10 Myths of Management and Organizational Consulting – Part 1

In Part 1, we’ll review myths 1-5. In the upcoming Part 2, we’ll review myths 6-10.

#1. Myth of the “One-Way Expert” Consultant

It is not uncommon that clients work from the assumption that there are consulting “experts” who can visit a client and promptly tell the client exactly what problems exist within the organization and then exactly what should be done to solve these situations. Experienced consultants and clients have realized that the “truth” in a process of organizational change emerges as you and your client work together, always sharing your perceptions, conclusions and learning. Successful organizational change is indeed a process – a journey – that you and your client take together. The accuracy of the recommendations often is not as important as your client’s commitment to – participation in – and learning from – implementing those recommendations.

This is not to say that consultants do not have expertise in how organizations function, why issues arise or what might be the range of solutions to address a given issue. As important as having this expertise is for the consultant to verify their impressions by working collaboratively with the client, as much as possible, to explore the inner workings of their client’s organization.

2. Myth That the Client’s Best Consultant Has “Been There, Done That”

Clients who have never worked with management and organizational consultants before often seek consultants who have successfully addressed the same problem in the same type of organization as the client’s. The client’s belief is that those consultants are experts at solving that situation in the client’s organization, as well. While that belief seems valid, it is extremely difficult to apply in real life. Each organization and its culture are highly unique as are the types of problems experienced by those organizations. The most important skills required by these consultants often do not include a strong understanding of the particular products, services or programs offered by the organization. The most important skills often are the ability to work with clients to apply principles of systems thinking, performance management and organizational change to address issues and goals.

3. Myth of the “Savior” Consultant

Some clients prefer that consultants somehow descend into the client’s organization, make several quick changes and then leave, having fixed the organization’s problems. Although these clients know better, they sometimes still act as if there are those kinds of “savior” consultants out there. Few, if any, management and organizational projects are really that simple. Consequently, many consulting projects end up not being useful, for example, strategic plans that collect dust on shelves.

4. Myth of the Detached, Objective Consultant

Recent innovations in organizational and management development, such as systems theory and chaos theory, have helped us realize that, as soon as you begin to interact with members of your client’s organization, you become part of the overall “system” of your client’s organization. You affect the organization and the organization affects you and your client. Experienced consultants have learned that the success of consulting rests, in large part, on how well the consultant and client work together to share their discovery, feedback, actions and learning.

5. Myth of “Diagnosis”

Similar to the myth of the detached, objective consultant are the beliefs of the consultant and client that the client’s situation can be “diagnosed” — as if the situation is a static, mechanical device with a problem that can be solved permanently by fixing one flawed component. Instead, organizations are ever-changing, dynamic systems whose changes are caused by a myriad of subsystems, each integrated with each other. Attention to one subsystem often changes the others, resulting in yet new issues and priorities as the system progresses through its life cycles, whether the system is an organization, department, team, product or person … and so it goes. It’s not a diagnostic event — it’s a process of discovery.

Tune in for Part 2 where we review myths 6-10.

What do you think?

—————————

For more resources, see the Library topics Consulting and Organizational Development.

———————————————————————————
Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD – Authenticity Consulting, LLC – 800-971-2250
Read my weekly blogs: Boards, Consulting and OD, Nonprofits and Strategic Planning.

Coaching, counseling, mentoring and consulting – what’s the difference?

I often get asked about the difference between coaching, counseling, mentoring and consulting. While the communication skills used by these professions are similar – such as asking questions, active listening, summarizing, etc, they are very different methods and it depends on what the client needs. Here are some distinctions:

Coaching – according to the International Coach Federation coaching is defined as “partnering with clients in a thought-provoking and creative process that inspires them to maximize their personal and professional potential.” The coach is the subject matter expert at coaching, not necessarily the subject matter expert of the client’s coaching topic.

Counseling – according to the CoActive Coaching, the boundary between coaching and counseling is not defined by a set of absolute rules or terms. In general, counselors are trained to diagnose and help client with emotional problems, the past or dysfunction while coaches are not. The coach’s domain is future oriented – what does the client want? And then coaching the client to get there.

Mentoring– a mentor is a wise and trusted guide and advisor. The mentor is the teacher that shares their experience while bringing the “mentee” up the ranks. A coach is not necessarily the subject matter expert in order to help develop the client.

Consulting – a consultant is an expert who is called on for professional or technical advice or opinions. They are relied on to understand the problem and present solutions. Consulting is unlike coaching because with pure coaching, the answers come from the client.

What are your thoughts about these distinctions?

For more resources, see the Library topic Personal and Professional Coaching.

The Role of SEO in Crisis Management

What do you want people to find on the first page of results when they search for your organization’s name on Google (which has 80+ percent of search traffic) or the other major search engines? You would probably prefer that they don’t find:

  • a vicious blog started by disgruntled former employees; or, 75 percent of the links leading to websites or blogs critical of your business; or,
  • websites and blogs that you don’t control, with your own sites buried on later Google pages; or,
  • your name prominently and negatively mentioned on legitimate (e.g., Better Business Bureau) or quasi-legitimate (RipOff Report) consumer-focused websites; or,
  • your name connected with an investigation by any regulatory or enforcement agency.

These are all situations that have been brought to Bernstein Crisis Management by clients in the past couple of years, with the crisis facing a growing number of organizations “simply” being the damage they are incurring online. The innocent are portrayed as guilty. Minor offenses are portrayed as major offenses. Criticism that sounds legitimate is purely or mostly fictional.

There are quite a few crisis management tactics that can mitigate the situations described above. Increasingly, one of the most essential tactics has been a form of search engine optimization (SEO) focused specifically on preserving and restoring reputation, when the crisis is already in progress, followed by creation of an “SEO shield” to preserve reputation going forward.

Just as relatively few public relations practitioners have extensive experience with crisis management, relatively few SEO consultants understand how to engage in SEO reputation management. Chesa Keane is one of them, and I’m pleased to bring you Chesa’s “10 Tips for SEO Reputation Management”…in my next blog post!

——————————-
For more resources, see the Free Management Library topic: Crisis Management
——————————-

If you want a seat at the table, learn the business

In my previous post, I mentioned the evolution of the HR professional into a strategic business partner and the necessity of this evolution for successful business. However, in many companies HR does not occupy a seat at the strategic planning table. Who’s to blame?

The answer to this question is hotly debated and often clear lines are drawn between those in HR and those in other functions. Many HR professionals blame the leaders for not seeing the value of their function to the organization, while some managers see HR as the roadblock to doing what needs to be done.

In a 2005 article written by Fast Company Magazine’s Keith Hammonds, Keith purports all the reasons “Why We Hate HR.” If the title itself isn’t enough to put a HR professional on the defense, then providing the declaration that “HR people aren’t the sharpest tacks in the box” as the first reason certainly will. His assertion in the article is that those who enter the HR field are not business people and are ill-equipped to understand business. He quotes a Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) study that identified which coursework HR professionals found most beneficial to their success in the field to support his message that the majority of those working in the field do not see understanding business as necessary to their success. The results showed that coursework in communications, business law, and ethics were most beneficial.

A recently released SHRM survey of HR leaders indicates the same finding. The respondents in the U.S. indicated that strategic thinking is one of the top five competencies needed for senior HR leaders; however, business knowledge was not listed. While the lineage of the field of HR coupled with the introduction of legislation to protect employers may have contributed to stereotypes that exist in the field about the HR profession, our failure as HR professionals to recognize that we are business people charged with the company’s most valuable assets will certainly continue to harbor those stereotypes we so emotionally defend. If you want a seat at the table, learn the business of business and speak the language of the executive team.

As always, your thoughts and questions are encouraged.
http://www.shrm.org/RESEARCH/Pages/default.aspx
http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/97/open_hr.html

For more resources, See the Human Resources library.

Why All This Talk About Leadership?

I’m a Leadership Coach and something of a community activist. I coach people who want to live a good life while making a difference. That’s what I want for myself. That’s what I want for you. Work Hard. Do Good. Have Fun Doing It.

You found this blog. So, I’m willing to bet that you are striving to do ever more good through your work, whether in the private, public or nonprofit arena. Or perhaps you are interested in leadership because you serve your community in a volunteer role as a board member or elected official.

Our discussions will help you at home, too. Imagine being able to really lead as you interact with loved ones to build the family and the friendships that you desire.

What drives your interest in leadership?

I’m interested in leadership that brings people together to change something miserable, or create something wonderful.

As a coach, I engage with dedicated, talented people who have one simple question about leadership: How can I do it better? I’m guessing you’ve asked that question yourself. Whatever your place on the organizational chart, wherever you fall on the scale of experience, expertise or authority, you want to improve your leadership so that you can achieve an even greater impact than you already do.

What does leadership feel like?

A coaching client is leading her company through a massive transformation. Yesterday she told me that although they’d faced some significant hurdles in the last few days things were still moving forward. “I have had some moments where I have felt daunted,” she said, “but right now I am feeling optimistic.”

Real leadership is about getting comfortable with the see-saw between “daunted” and “optimistic.” Our hope is that this blog will support you when you are up, when you’re down, and in between. Thanks to my co-host, Steve Wolinski, for kicking things off. I’m glad the conversation has begun! Please join us.

Structure is irrelevant

An enterprise trying to map out its structure

Not all social enterprises look alike. While many people immediately think of nonprofits (or nongovernmental organizations, NGOs), in practice any type of business can be a social enterprise. As long as you “harness the power of the marketplace to solve critical social or environmental problem,” which to me means you sell stuff to customers as you pursue your larger social purpose, you’re in.

Regardless of whether you’re set up as a nonprofit, a for-profit, a hybrid like the new L3C in the US, or just an individual with an idea to change the world, funded — at least in part — by selling products or services, you’re a member of this special club.

Social enterprise is not just about finding the right business-like strategies, which, if applied correctly, will help create social impact. It’s also a movement, of tens of thousands of people and organizations around the world working on their own and working together to change the world, combining the best of the commercial and non-commercial sectors.

What makes this a movement is the shared vision for social change — how the world will be better if we succeed at our work; and the business models — how that work gets paid for, at least a big share of it, from entrepreneurial strategies.

Now, speaking of share, there’s no formula on what percentage of your income needs to be “earned” (as opposed to granted or donated) to be a social enterprise. But I tend to think the earned portion needs to be at least 25% to make some claim to the “enterprise” portion of the term. And while profitability is a good thing, and for for-profit social enterprises ultimately an essential thing, it’s not a requirement to qualify as a social enterprise.

So, for example, if you have a sustainable business model that relies on half of its revenue from earned income, and half from grants, I call that a successful social enterprise.

So regardless of your organization’s legal structure, or lack thereof, join us to talk about not just why we do this work, but how. It’s the how that will be the primary focus of this blog, but we won’t shy away from the why as well.

What are the challenges you’re facing with your social enterprise work?

The 10 Steps of Crisis Communications – Part 2

6. Anticipate Crises

If you’re being proactive and preparing for crises, gather your Crisis Communications Team for long brainstorming sessions on all the potential crises which can occur at your organization.

There are at least two immediate benefits to this exercise:

* You may realize that some of the situations are preventable by simply modifying existing methods of operation.

* You can begin to think about possible responses, about best case/worst case scenarios, etc. Better now than when under the pressure of an actual crisis.

In some cases, of course, you know that a crisis will occur because you’re planning to create it — e.g., to lay off employees, or to make a major acquisition. Then, you can proceed with steps 8-10 below, even before the crisis occurs.

There is a more formal method of gathering this information that I call a “vulnerability audit,” about which I’ll be writing more soon.

7. Develop Holding Statements

While full message development must await the outbreak of an actual crisis, “holding statements” — messages designed for use immediately after a crisis breaks — can be developed in advance to be used for a wide variety of scenarios to which the organization is perceived to be vulnerable, based on the assessment you conducted in Step 6 of this process. An example of holding statements by a hotel chain with properties hit by a natural disaster — before the organization headquarters has any hard factual information — might be:

“We have implemented our crisis response plan, which places the highest priority on the health and safety of our guests and staff.”

“Our hearts and minds are with those who are in harm’s way, and we hope that they are well.”

“We will be supplying additional information when it is available and posting it on our website.”

The organization’s Crisis Communications Team should regularly review holding statements to determine if they require revision and/or whether statements for other scenarios should be developed.

8. Assess the Crisis Situation

Reacting without adequate information is a classic “shoot first and ask questions afterwards” situation in which you could be the primary victim. But if you’ve done all of the above first, it’s a “simple” matter of having the Crisis Communications Team on the receiving end of information coming in from your communications “tree,” ensuring that the right type of information is being provided so that you can proceed with determining the appropriate response.

Assessing the crisis situation is, therefore, the first crisis communications step you can’t take in advance. But if you haven’t prepared in advance, your reaction will be delayed by the time it takes your in-house staff or quickly-hired consultants to run through steps 1 to 7. Furthermore, a hastily created crisis communications strategy and team are never as efficient as those planned and rehearsed in advance.

9. Identify Key Messages

With holding statements available as a starting point, the Crisis Communications Team must continue developing the crisis-specific messages required for any given situation. The team already knows, categorically, what type of information its stakeholders are looking for. What should those stakeholders know about this crisis? Keep it simple — have no more than three main messages for all stakeholders and, as necessary, some audience-specific messages for individual groups of stakeholders.

10. Riding Out the Storm

No matter what the nature of a crisis…no matter whether it’s good news or bad…no matter how carefully you’ve prepared and responded…some of your stakeholders are not going to react the way you want them to. This can be immensely frustrating. What do you do?

* Take a deep breath.

* Take an objective look at the reaction(s) in question. Is it your fault, or their unique interpretation?

* Decide if another communication to those stakeholders is likely to change their impression for the better.

* Decide if another communication to those stakeholders could make the situation worse.

* If, after considering these factors, you think it’s still worth more communication, then take your best shot!

“It Can’t Happen To Me”

When a healthy organization’s CEO or CFO looks at the cost of preparing a crisis communications plan, either a heavy investment of in-house time or retention of an outside professional for a substantial fee, it is tempting for them to fantasize “it can’t happen to me” or “if it happens to me, we can handle it relatively easily.”

Hopefully, that type of ostrich-playing is rapidly becoming a thing of the past. Yet I know that thousands of organizations hit by Hurricane Katrina will have, when all is said and done, suffered far more damage than would have occurred with a fully developed crisis communications plan in place. This has also been painfully true for scores of clients I have served over the past 25 years. Even the best crisis management professional is playing catch up — with more damage occurring all the time — when the organization has no crisis communications infrastructure already in place.

The Last Word — For Now

I would like to believe that organizations worldwide are finally “getting it” about crisis preparedness, whether we’re talking about crisis communications, disaster response or business continuity. Certainly client demand for advance preparation has increased dramatically in the past half-decade, at least for my consultancy. But I fear that there is, in fact, little change in what I have said in the past, that 95 percent of American organizations remain either completely unprepared or significantly under-prepared for crises. And my colleagues overseas report little better, and sometimes worse statistics.

Choose to be part of the prepared minority. Your stakeholders will appreciate it!

——————————-
For more resources, see the Free Management Library topic: Crisis Management
——————————-