Category: Project Management Tools

Project management has become so much a part of business that comparing tools like monday.com vs Asana require you to see them more as work operating systems. They bring all of project management’s sophisticated tools to bear on your daily schedule. We compare monday.com vs Asana to see which is a better fit for your work life.

monday.com: Best for Small Teams Working Remotely

From $10

★★★★★

3.0

Visit

monday.com is a code-free, cloud-based project management software geared with a spectrum of sleek features for small teams working remotely. It makes it simple for you to design workflow apps for your project. You can use these apps to handle day-to-day operations and responsibilities.

monday.com comes with workflow templates you can easily customize to manage your project. It helps you reduce your manual administrative work by automating key tasks. You can also integrate monday.com with other tools to streamline project management. Read the full monday.com review for greater insight into it.

• Modern user interface (UI) is easy to use and navigate
• Highly customizable features 
• Ideal for managing ongoing work for multiple projects

• Confusing pricing of plans
• Slow customer support 
• Best features only available with upper tiers of paid plans

Pricing

• Basic: $10/user per month
• Standard: $12/user per month
• Pro: $20/user per month
• Enterprise: Inquire for price

Asana: Best for Flexibility and Customization

From $13.49

★★★★★

3.5

Visit

Asana is one of the most popular project management software out there. It’s easy to use and offers some of the most powerful management tools available. It’s a versatile software that suits small teams but can also scale to larger companies. Asana lets you divide tasks into themes and time-related segments so you can manage your workflow with ease. 

With a much broader feature set, Asana is a great choice for agile project management. You can use multiple management styles including Gantt charts, task lists, and Kanban boards with this project management software. Read the complete Asana review for greater insight into it.

• Offers workload management
• Smart project-focused interface
• Various management features

• No financial management tools
• Assigns tasks to one user only
• Steeper learning curve

Pricing 

• Basic: Free 
• Premium: $13.49/user per month
• Business: $30.49/user per month
• Enterprise: Inquire for price

Pricing & Features Comparison

Key Features

monday.com

Asana

Pricing

3/5

3/5

Team Management

3/5

4/5

Project Delivery Management

4/5

5/5

Agile Methodology Suitability

3/5

4/5

Waterfall Methodology Suitability

3/5

3/5

Risk Management

4/5

3/5

Reporting

4/5

4.5/5

Finance Management

3/5

3/5

Collaboration and communication

3/5

4/5

Integration With Other Apps

2/5

4/5

Usability

3/5

5/5

Support

3/5

3.5/5

Privacy

3/5

3.5/5

Pros

• More price options
• Customized views
• Templates help you set up project

• Larger teams on free tier
• Attractive Status Updates
• Easy to use

Cons

• Limited integrations and automations

• More expensive

Overall Rating

3/5

★★★★★

3.5/5

★★★★★

monday.com vs Asana

Putting monday.com vs Asana means comparing two well-known project management software options. Both have fairly good reputations, while also being somewhat more expensive than competitors. 

The similarities don’t end there. Both also focus on task management, using tasks as a starting point to build out your project. There is a standard set of popular project management tools that both provide. 

However, the two platforms are far from clones of each other. While the tools may be similar, the presentation and usability can be leagues apart. Follow along to discover which is the best fit for you.

Pricing

monday.com and Asana have similar, straightforward pricing plans that will be familiar to anyone who has used project management software recently. Both offer a free version for a Basic plan best used to manage simple projects, limited in users and functions. Pay tiers offer more with each step up in price.

monday.com

monday.com is slightly less expensive, with four pay tier options:

• Basic: $10/user per month
• Standard: $12/user per month
• Pro: $20/user per month
• Enterprise: Inquire for price

monday.com offers unlimited boards even at the free tier, but pay tiers offer more reporting options and more seats. Depending on the tier, you may also be limited in integration actions, automations, or a few other things.

Asana

Asana offers three different levels beyond the free tier, including:

• Premium: $13.49/user per month
• Business: $30.49/user per month
• Enterprise: Inquire for price

Each of the pay tiers offers unlimited projects and many reporting options. Some of the most powerful tools, such as portfolio management, require a Business or better subscription.

Winner: Tie 

Although monday.com is less expensive, its limiting API calls and other actions can be a real problem for some users. Asana offers a lot of important tools even on the least expensive pay tier, though the higher cost puts it on par with monday.com.

Read: Best 6 Free Project Management Software

Team Management

In terms of team management, Asana, and monday.com both focus on managing teams through task management. In fact, like most examples of this type of project management software, everything starts when you create tasks and then assign tasks to team members. The details are slightly different between the two options. However, they both allow you to add details, due dates, define task level priority, and more.

With that foundation, you can bring a number of powerful team management features to bear. Both Asana and monday.com focus most resource management tools on the time commitment of each team member, offering a Workload view to track team level, though Asana’s is a bit easier to use. For both platforms, it’s an option that is only available with the more expensive tiers.

Additionally, task progress tracking is straightforward with both platforms and each has an easy-to-find action log.

Winner: Asana

While both platforms allow you to filter tasks by specific team members, as well as track workload, it’s much simpler to do in Asana. monday.com helps you construct a sort of spreadsheet to do the same thing, which is much more involved.

Project Delivery Management

Some of the most important tools in a project manager’s toolbox are designed to keep everything on track and moving in the right direction. When it comes to Asana vs monday.com, they seem to offer some similar tools for tracking project statuses. 

Gantt charts are easy to set up, with task dependencies requiring no more than a drag-and-drop, providing a look at project workflow management. Both options also provide a way to monitor several projects simultaneously, balancing resources and workload. 

The two options also provide a list view, breaking down steps and making it easy to see both project plans and project schedules. However, monday.com’s list is easier to read and can contain more information.

Winner: Asana

While monday.com’s list view is easier to read, Asana has one big advantage. Information from all your projects is collected in the Portfolios tab, where it can be visualized in a few different ways. monday.com requires you to set up a separate Portfolio Management board.

Methodology Suitability

Comparing Asana vs monday.com, is one more suitable for waterfall methodology or Agile methodology? Both can be used for either method used to manage projects, though it might not be surprising that they offer some tools exclusive to the Agile approach. Read our review on waterfall vs agile methods.

Asana has a Board view that serves very well as a Kanban board. monday.com also provides Kanban boards for all your projects, as well as for your overall portfolio. In both cases, it’s possible to drag and drop tasks into the appropriate column. Asana’s Boards offer some automation options that Monday doesn’t, however. 

Additionally, Asana’s Update feature is much more comprehensive, including a painless method of automatically generating graphs, and works great for Sprint reviews. 

Winner: Asana

A few features, such as automations in Asana’s Boards, edges it out ahead of its competition. 

Risk Management

There are no native features for bug or issue tracking in either option. We’re contrasting Asana vs monday.com, but realistically they do have a lot in common. Unlike a project management tool like, for example, Jira, they aren’t focused tightly on software development. However, both integrate with apps that can perform those functions. 

Asana offers a way to mark a project as On Track, Off Track, or At Risk, as part of a status update. monday.com can mark projects automatically as part of its Overview widget, based on the number of tasks team members have completed, versus tasks still outstanding. Note that the Overview widget is only available to Pro and above accounts.

Winner: monday.com

Asana’s project status tool is used for communication, telling people something you already know. monday.com’s feature offers an analysis, offering more information on the health of your project, though it comes with a higher price tag.

Reporting

Managing projects is a complex business, which graphs, charts, and other visualizations can help keep straight. Both options offer a number of ways to visualize projects, from variations on a basic project management tool like Gantt charts, to the status reports we’ve already mentioned.

Reporting options for portfolio management are also available, allowing you track the progress and resource use of multiple projects. monday.com offers a wider range of reporting for your portfolio, allowing you to set up a Gantt chart of project dependencies, rather than task dependencies.

Winner: Asana

For reporting, Asana vs monday.com is close to a tie. monday.com does have a few more options. However, Asana offers a user interface that moves a lot of information for you. Check out your portfolio and all the information you entered in each project is already there. monday.com wants you to enter portfolio information again, separately.

Finance Management

Few things are more important to a successful project than finances. However, it’s an area that most cloud-based project management platforms leave for integrated apps, rather than handling natively.

monday.com doesn’t have any tools for tracking expenses exactly, though it doesn’t rely on integration for those functions. In many ways, monday.com’s platform can be thought of as a specialized spreadsheet, which you can customize to your needs. A Numbers Column can be easily added to track how estimated costs compare to the actual project plan, or how much your team members’ time costs.

Asana has the List view, which is similar to monday.com’s spreadsheet layout and can perform the same functions, allowing you to track, quickly add up, or compare numbers. However, both also offer integrations to add more tools.

Asana has specifically partnered with Power Bi for finance management and reporting, though it integrates with other options as well. Time tracking, on the other hand, has to be handled by integration, with Asana partnering with Harvest for that need. 

Winner: Tie

Yet again, Asana vs monday.com is a close comparison. In this case, the tools offered by both options are similar enough that it’s tough to choose between them. Additionally, they both integrate with many of the same third-party apps.

Collaboration and Communication

One key responsibility for project management software in modern business is as a set of collaboration tools, used for workflow management when a team may be physically distant from each other. 

The first step in team collaboration is team communication, so both platforms offer lots of different ways to send messages. Communication and task management features have been combined, as both allow you to comment on individual tasks. Comments can also be added to projects and files, including a mark-up tool for the free file storage.

Asana offers a team page that allows each team member to track all the projects they’re working on. A shared team calendar makes it easy to track due dates and progress. Additionally, a Chrome extension allows team members to pull ideas from around the web into the workspace to share.

monday.com can offer a similar calendar, as well as a board designed for project requests. Both platforms also offer iOS and Android apps for free. monday.com also has workdocs, a document shared with and edited by the whole team.

Winner: Asana

monday.com’s workdoc is a nice feature, but nothing you can’t find in Google Docs or many other places. Asana offers the chance to focus comments on specific tasks, while also seeing the big picture.

Integration With Other Apps

Even the most powerful project management tool won’t have every feature you need for your perfect workflow. Integration allows you to reach out and add those missing features to your pool of task management tools.

Both Asana and monday.com have libraries of integrations for anything you might need, from tracking team members’ time to managing customer requests. Some big names include Google Workspace, Adobe Creative Cloud, and Microsoft Teams. Both platforms also offer an API.

Winner: Asana

Both Asana and monday.com have wide libraries of integrations to choose from, including all the most commonly needed apps. However, Monday limits the integration and automations on most tiers.

Usability

There is no such thing as a perfect project management tool and everyone’s experience will vary. However, a user-friendly tool for project management with a gentle learning curve can save your mental health, your company’s money, and hours of aggravation.

Both platforms focus on task management, with a number of features that have become semi-standard for this sort of software. The task manager allows you to assign team members, attach documents, define dependencies, and many other things. The user interface includes drag-and-drop functionality and most basic functions can be understood with a little experimentation.

monday.com’s user interface is practical and straightforward. It may not be attractive, but all task information is visible in the main table. It’s easy to add Gantt charts, Kanban boards, and more. It’s also easy to find automations for repetitive and mundane tasks, as well as integrations.

Asana has a slicker presentation, but is just as easy to use. The team page makes for a good base, which is helpful as it can be easy to get lost among the different views. However, workflow management is greatly aided by only having to enter information in one place.

Winner: Asana

The user-friendliness of Asana vs monday.com is ultimately a personal choice. However, a few of Asana’s features stand out, such as easily formatted Status Updates and a single tab that collects all of a project’s files.

Support

Support for either option, comparing Asana vs monday.com, boils down to a web form. You describe your issue and wait for a service rep to get back with some help. However, both also offer many additional resources to help you figure out solutions for yourself.

monday.com offers real-life content examples from users, which you can peruse to get some ideas for your own project management style. There is also a range of video tutorials, webinars, and support docs. The only upgrade is if you’re an Enterprise customer, which gets you a dedicated support manager.

Asana has a similar set-up, similarly offering project managers video tutorials, webinars, courses, and so forth. They have a wider range of walk-throughs, which can be helpful. Additionally, business tier customers can get priority support, moving their help requests to the front of the line.

Winner: Asana

Asana has a bigger library of tutorials and courses. The option for priority on support for the Business tier of service is also nice.

Privacy

Project management systems can contain a lot of very important, very private information. It’s therefore not surprising that both Asana and monday.com make promises to keep information in your work operating system secure. 

Both say that they don’t share information with third parties, the exception being when you elect to use an integration. Additionally, both monday.com and Asana have made commitments to 99% uptime.

Asana has a couple of neat offerings, such as the ability to choose where in the world your data is stored. However, that’s a feature only available to Enterprise clients.

Winner: Asana

It might take an expert to compare some aspects of Asana vs monday.com, and their security. However, Asana also helps you secure your data by offering admins the ability to require 2FA security, limiting access, and a number of other tools.

Alternative Project Management Software Options

Wrike

Visit

Wrike gives you greater flexibility and works for teams of all types and sizes. You get a wide range of project management features. Wrike’s price may be a bit higher than others, but the range of features is worth it. Read the ultimate Wrike review for a more detailed analysis.

• Specialized marketing, creative, and services delivery team packages
• Offers in-built time tracking 
• Analytics tool generates charts automatically

• Costlier than other PM software
• Templates can’t remove all options
• Can’t prioritize tasks

Pricing

• Free version.
• Professional Plan: $9.80/user/month.
• Business Plan: $24.80/user/month.
• Enterprise Plan: Inquire for price.

ClickUp

Visit

ClickUp is a leading project management platform. It’s scalable for teams of all sizes. ClickUp is excellent for remote work. Creating spaces for different projects and adding teams to them is pretty easy. To learn more about this tool, read our ClickUp review.

• Lower cost
• Better support options
• Free version offers a lot of features

• Slows down when you use too many ClickApps 
• Complicated interface
• Lacks workflow management

Pricing

• Free
• Unlimited: $5/user/month
• Business: $12/user/month
• Business Plus: $19/user/month
• Enterprise: Inquire for price.

Microsoft Project

Visit

Microsoft Project is one of the oldest project management software. It has been the go-to PM tool for many industry-leading companies for many years. But it comes with a steep learning curve and is not ideal for beginners.

• Offers projections, baselines, and other features
• Review all your projects at once
• Advanced project management features

• Expensive
• Steep learning curve
• Slow customer support

Pricing

• Plan 1:$10/user/month
• Plan 3: $30/user/month
• Plan 5: $55/user/month

monday.com vs Asana Conclusion

Both monday.com and Asana offer some of the best project management tools available at the moment. However, small differences add up, pointing to a clear winner. Asana comes out on top due to a more attractive and intuitive user interface. It’s also easier to manage tasks when all the task details move from view to view automatically. 

Additionally, the difference in price disappears when you compare feature availability. monday.com is high-quality software, but Asana is just a bit better.

Anything can be a project, if you want to look at it that way. With that in mind, it’s possible to use all the methods of project management to keep your own life organized and on track. That might have been an intimidating prospect even a few years ago. Today, quality platforms like Asana and monday.com make it easy.

It’s the clash of the titans as we weigh Trello vs Asana, two giants within the project management industry. If you’re searching for the right project management software, it’s virtually impossible to not come across the two. 

Trello and Asana are popular among a range of world-renowned companies. Both can be pretty attractive options with their remarkable user-friendliness and enticing free plans. This makes your choice all the much more difficult. But relax, we’ve done the research for you. Continue reading as we bring Trello vs Asana head-to-head to find which of the two is the better choice. 

Trello: Best for Kanban-style Project Management

Visit

Trello offers Kanban board-based project management where you can organize tasks and collaborate with your team with ease. It has a very simple and easy-to-use interface but it lacks advanced management features. 

Trello is a great choice if you want to visualize your project operations on a large board with multiple lists and cards. It offers a range of integrations as well as automation options to streamline managerial tasks. Creating automation rules is relatively easier too.

• Very simple to use
• Visual project progression
• Easy to onboard new members

• Offers basic management features
• No financial management tools
• Not viable for large projects

Pricing

1. Free plan
2. Standard plan starting at $5/user/month
3. Premium plan starting at $10/user/month
4. Enterprise plan starting at $7.38 to 17.50/user/month

Asana: Best for Flexibility and Customization

Visit

Asana uses a basic, task-based approach to project management. It lets users manage their workflow with ease by dividing tasks according to themes and in time-related segments: Today, Upcoming, and Later.

Asana has a much broader feature set and is great for small teams following agile project management. It offers multiple management styles including task lists, Gantt charts, and Kanban boards. This project management software also comes with ready-made templates you can use to design your project and also lets you create custom templates.

• Offers workload management
• Smart project-focused interface
• Various management features

• No financial management tools
• Assigns tasks to one user only
• Steeper learning curve

Pricing

1. Basic plan – free 
2. Premium plan starting at $10.99/user/month
3. Business plan starting at $24.99/user/month

Trello vs Asana – Pricing & Features Comparison 

Trello uses intuitive drag-and-drop functionality to move cards between lists and boards. You can comment on cards, assign them to users and automate functions with rules. It’s cheaper than Asana but lacks advanced management features. 

Asana, on the other hand, is a bit more expensive but its price is justified with the range of powerful features it comes with. It offers a great user experience, greater flexibility, and comes with basic reporting features. Being a complete project management suite, Asana trumps Trello in most departments.

Plan

Trello Free

Trello Standard

Trello Premium

Trello Enterprise

Asana Basic

Asana Premium

Asana Business

Price

Free

$5/user/mo

$10/user/mo

$7-17/user/mo

Free

$10.99/user/mo

$24.99/use/mo

Free trial

N/A

14-day

N/A

30-day

30-day

No. of users

Unlimited

Unlimited

Unlimited

Unlimited

15

Unlimited free guests

Unlimited free guests

No. of boards/projects

10 boards per workspace

Unlimited

Unlimited

Unlimited

Unlimited

Unlimited

Unlimited

Ease of use

Easiest PM software to use. Intuitive drag-and-drop interface.

Easiest PM software to use. Intuitive drag-and-drop interface.

Easiest PM software to use. Intuitive drag-and-drop interface.

Easiest PM software to use. Intuitive drag-and-drop interface.

Easy to use. Has a powerful and refined interface.

Easy to use. Has a powerful and refined interface.

Easy to use. Has a powerful and refined interface.

Storage

Unlimited (10MB/file)

Unlimited (250MB/file)

Unlimited (250MB/file)

Unlimited (250MB/file)

Unlimited (100MB/file)

Unlimited (100MB/file)

Unlimited (100MB/file)

Kanban boards

Gantt charts

Calendar

Reports

Messaging

Time tracking

Color coding

Integrations

Slack, Salesforce, Google Drive, Jira, Adobe XD and 100+ others

Slack, Salesforce, Google Drive, Jira, Adobe XD and 100+ others

Slack, Salesforce, Google Drive, Jira, Adobe XD and 100+ others

Slack, Salesforce, Google Drive, Jira, Adobe XD and 100+ others

Jira, Zoom, Salesforce, Google Drive, Microsoft Teams and 100+ others

Jira, Zoom, Salesforce, Google Drive, Microsoft Teams and 100+ others

Jira, Zoom, Salesforce, Google Drive, Microsoft Teams and 100+ others

Customer support

Online forum support

Phone and concierge support

Phone and concierge support

Phone and concierge support

Support Tickets

Support Tickets

Priority phone support

Winner: Asana – It takes the lead when it comes to advanced project management. Asana is a better project management software than Trello in terms of features, flexibility, customizability, and dependency management.

Asana vs Trello: Ease of Use

A smooth UX is crucial for any project management software. The software solution you choose should be easy to operate so that you and your team can get quickly down to the real deal. Asana and Trello are known for their amazing user experience. That’s probably why they’re at the top when it comes to the best project management software. But which of the two is easier to use?

Trello – Simplest Project Management Software

Experts consider Trello to be the easiest to use among the many project management software. Since it uses a highly intuitive Kanban board style, you can easily understand how everything works from the get-go. But that’s also because Trello doesn’t offer a lot of advanced features. One could say that its ease-of-use stems from its simplicity.

It’s easy to move cards around using the drag-and-drop function. Other features like comments, assigning users, and setting due dates are all easily accessible. When it comes to automation, Trello attempts to simplify its architecture so everyone can create custom rules. But that’s not always the case, as there’s a limit to what you can automate. 

Asana – Incredible UX with Powerful Features

It’s not easy to combine advanced management features with an easy-to-use interface. But that’s exactly what Asana has managed to do. It uses a traditional project management software layout but makes sure users can use all functions with little or no training.

Asana puts much more effort into keeping things simple and smooth. It’s not as visually-oriented as Trello, but it tries to keep things as it gives you a range of task management views to select from when planning your project. This makes it convenient for managers who want to work on different projects. 

Winner: Trello – a great tool for beginners and simple projects. 

Trello vs Asana: Dependency Management

This is a crucial feature for you if you want to follow the waterfall methodology with your project. Some projects require tasks to be completed in chronological order. This means you can’t start on the next task before the previous one is complete.

Trello Dependency Management

Trello doesn’t do very well in this department. It doesn’t have a built-in feature to manage task dependencies. You can add a dependency management feature to your Trello boards with a power-up (integration), Hello Epics. But this comes at an additional cost.

Asana Dependency Management

Dependency management is an area where Asana works better than Trello because you can specify which tasks need to be completed before others can begin.

The timeline view helps identify any bottlenecks or problems where people are idle waiting for other tasks to get done. Asana actually lets you organize these dependencies to solve such problems.

Winner: Asana – Asana has built-in dependency management features while Trello doesn’t. 

Trello vs Asana: Project Management Views

Project management views offered by the software matter a lot when you have a specific management style. Ideally, you should be able to switch between different views to suit different projects.

Trello PM View

Trello’s free and standard plans offer the traditional Kanban board view only. You can add additional views with power-ups but at an additional cost. The premium and enterprise plans offer a range of management views including dashboard, timeline, workspace table, calendar, workspace calendar, and map views. 

Asana PM View

Asana offers a greater range of built-in project management views with its free plan. You can visualize your project with a board view, list view, or calendar view in the basic plan. The premium plan comes with a timeline view, forms view, and a few others. 

Winner: Asana – It has a range of PM views while Trello offers a Kanban board view only.

Asana vs Trello: Integrations

3rd party integrations are of core importance when evaluating a cloud-based service. The better it integrates with the software you already use, the more useful it is for you. Let’s see how Asana and Trello match up in terms of integrations. 

Trello Power-Ups

Trello integrates with other software tools through Power-Ups. It has recently made its Power-Ups unlimited to all users. With more than 130 integrations with different apps, Trello lets you streamline your work operations. Some of its most popular integrations include Jira, Time Tracker by TimeCamp, Crumble, Microsoft Teams, Gmail, Google Drive, and Slack.

Trello’s Power-Ups often come at an additional cost which keeps adding up to the total project management cost.

Asana Integrations

Asana integrates with more than 200 apps. These cover a range of software categories including productivity, communication, finance, reporting, and human resources. Some of the most popular Asana integrations are Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Office 365, Adobe Creative Cloud, Slack, Google Drive, Dropbox, Vimeo, and Canva.

Winner: Tie – Both Trello and Asana have a healthy number of integrations with different apps. 

Trello vs Asana: Sharing & Collaboration

Sharing and collaboration are what project management tools are built for. The right software should let all members of your team collaborate with ease. It should also let you share your project with guest users in case you want clients to be able to monitor the progress.

Trello

Trello gives you a basic collaboration ability. It lets you assign tasks to users and add comments to cards. The comments feature lets all members of the team participate in co-creating a deliverable. You can also add an unlimited number of users to a board even if you have the free plan. 

You can also invite an unlimited number of guests to your Trello boards. But a lot of users or guests is not always practical because there’s a limit to what Trello can handle. It’s not a great management software for larger, more complex projects so you might never need more than 10-15 members on board. 

Asana

Asana’s free plan lets you work with a maximum of 15 users with the basic plan. You’d have to purchase the premium plan if you need to add more members. It lets you share your entire team and projects externally. The premium and free plans let you add unlimited free guests and reporting across multiple projects to easily share progress reports with clients. 

Winner: Asana – It lets you share and collaborate on a larger scale than Trello.

Trello vs Asana: Customer Service

Although both management tools are pretty easy to use and there’s very little chance you’d find yourself stuck while using them, customer service is still an important factor. A responsive customer support team matters, no matter what software you’re using. 

Some teammates may find it tough to use specific features such as automation rules on Trello or syncing another app with Asana. You wouldn’t want your work operations to come to a halt just because you can’t seem to figure out how a feature works and the support team is taking too long to respond. 

Trello Customer Support

Trello has an online forum for free users. While the forum is a valuable resource, it’s not always the quickest way to find a solution. Paid users get phone and concierge support to get their issues resolved by the support team and are only available during office hours, Eastern Time, Monday to Friday.

Asana Customer Support

Free and Premium users can get in touch with the customer service team through support tickets. This means you submit a form or email to communicate your issue and this is not always the fastest option. Only enterprise users get priority phone support. 

Winner: Tie – Both Trello and Asana’s customer service teams have a similar performance. 

Customer Reviews

Customers are always a great source of information when reviewing a project management software. Customer reviews give you first-hand information on what a software is good at, where it needs improvement and how it has helped their team. Here’s a brief overview of Trello and Asana’s customer reviews from some of the top software reviewing platforms. 

Trello Customer Reviews

Trello scores a healthy 4.4/5 average rating for its 12,500 reviews on G2, and an 8.4/10 with 2000+ reviews on TrustRadius. A vast majority of customer reviews share positive feedback on the software, especially for its interface and ease of use. 

Asana Customer Reviews

Asana has a 4.3/5 with 8000+ reviews on G2 and a TrustRadius score of 8.5/10 with 1800+ reviews. Although it hasn’t been as widely reviewed as Trello, we can consider the customer reviews to be a tie among the two. Customers mostly praise Asana for its ease-of-use, flexibility, and team management features.

Winner: Tie – Both Trello and Asana share similar customer review scores. 

Trello & Asana Alternatives

Wrike

Visit

Wrike gives you greater customizability and works for all types and sizes of businesses. It offers a wide range of project management features. Its price may be a bit higher, but the functionality is worth it. This in-depth review on Wrike summarizes all you need to know about it.

• Specialized marketing, creative, and services delivery team packages
• Offers in-built time tracking 
• Analytics tool generates charts automatically

• Costlier than other PM software
• Templates can’t remove all options
• Can’t prioritize tasks

Pricing

1. Free version.
2. Professional Plan: $9.80/user/month.
3. Business Plan: $24.80/user/month.
4. Enterprise Plan: Inquire for price.

ClickUp

Visit

ClickUp is a leading project management platform. It suits teams of all sizes and is excellent for those working remotely. You can create spaces for different projects with ease and add teams to them accordingly.

• Lower cost
• Better support options
• Free version offers a lot of features

• Slows down when you use too many ClickApps 
• Complicated interface
• Lacks workflow management

Pricing

1. Free
2. Unlimited: $5/user/month
3. Business: $12/user/month
4. Business Plus: $19/user/month
5. Enterprise: Inquire for price.

Microsoft Project

Visit

Microsoft Project is one of the oldest PM software out there. It has been the go-to management tool for many industry-leading companies for decades. But it’s not as easy to use. MS Project is best for experienced project managers.

• Offers projections, baselines, and other features
• Review all your projects at once
• Advanced project management features

• Expensive
• Steep learning curve
• Slow customer support

Pricing

1. Plan 1:$10/user/month
2. Plan 3: $30/user/month
3. Plan 5: $55/user/month

Bottom Line on Trello vs Asana

Asana is a better project management software than Trello in terms of features, flexibility, customizability, and dependency management. Trello is much more limited in the management features its offers, but its simple Kanban board interface makes it a popular choice for beginners and simple projects. 

Choose Asana if you have a larger team and want to work on different projects with different management styles. The cost is a bit higher but its features compensate for it. On the other hand, if you prefer visual organization and like a board-based management style, Trello can prove to be an excellent choice.

Microsoft Project and Hive are two of the most popular project management software services on the market. Each has its strengths and disadvantages relating to project portfolio management tools, complete with file and information sharing, time tracking, resource management, third-party integrations, scheduling features, and more.

Quick Comparison: Microsoft Project vs Hive

Key Features

Microsoft Project

Hive

Ease-of-use

3/5

4.5/5

Project Mapping

3.5/5

4.5/5

Capacity

5/5

4/5

To-Do Lists

3/5

4/5

Integrations

3/5

5/5

Customer support

3/5

4.5/5

Pricing

2/5

4.5/5

Pros

• Excellent for large businesses
• Power BI for deep analytical insights
• Easy time and task progress tracking

• Integrates with 1000+ apps
• Easy-to-learn chat and file sharing tools
• High number of available views

Cons

• Steep learning curve required
• Average customer support
• Limited integrations with third-party apps

• No search function for each project
• Mobile apps are not as intuitive as desktop version
• File deletion is permanent

Overall Rating

★★★★★

3.5/5

★★★★★

4/5

Microsoft Project vs Hive

Microsoft Project and Hive may be similar services, but they each take a different approach to project management software. We looked at the features and functionality of both to compare them, including:

• Ease of use. 
• Project mapping.
• Capacity.
• To-do lists.
• Integrations.
• Customer support.
• Cost.

Ease of Use

Popular project management and portfolio management software Microsoft Project allows a user to choose from several popular views, including board, grid, and Gantt views. Grid views are arguably the most basic, converting any project into a simple ordered list of tasks with status and due dates and not much else. Another view, Kanban, offers heavy visuals, converting tasks into boxes that can be dragged and dropped to rearrange the order, drag its duration, and more.

Like Microsoft Project, many user reviews have praised Hive project management software for its intuitive platform. It offers six views, including status, team, calendar, label, Gantt, and table. Of the six, Gantt and table view are the most popular, with each functionality offering its benefits on the way teams view and process work.

Another benefit of Hive technology is the ability to convert workflows to different views. Users can flip projects from Kanban to project views and vice versa. Hive also offers mobile apps to be able to check-in when on the go.

Winner: Hive is simple to use, offers plenty of diversity, and is easy on the eyes and mind.

Project Mapping

Microsoft Project offers excellent project mapping and portfolio management functionalities designed to show every step and all processes from project start to finish using flow charts. For starters, it offers an auto-scheduled feature that automatically maps out a calendar for your project by entering scope and designated time frames for each task. Consider this one of the more useful tools for project managers.

It also allows users to create “Master Project Plans” that combine multiple project details into one centralized workspace for a higher-level overview. Subprojects can be tied to master projects, all of which can be viewed using Gantt charts, grid views, and board views.

Hive also offers outstanding project mapping and portfolio management tools, starting with its six views mentioned above. Two of its core methodologies are Kanban and Agile. Kanban boards are a highly visual representation of workflows using customizable task cards flipped to either a Not Started, In Progress, or Completed status. They can be easily dragged and dropped with every status change.

Winner: Hive has a much more simplified interface, a higher number of available views, and easier toggling between different views.

To-Do Lists

Hive offers a comprehensive to-do list feature with milestones. It starts by entering tasks using your “My Actions” list and selecting due dates. Each to-do item is full of options, including the ability to create sub-actions, link a dependent action, and contribute to each task by uploading attachments, adding comments, using action templates, and generating share links for other members of your organization to view.

If to-do lists are an important functionality for you, Microsoft Project has very robust tools. All users have the option to start a to-do list using a blank project file, easily converting them into projects and shareable files. Once tasks are added, a user can indent and outdent tasks to show hierarchy, link tasks to show relationships, and change views.

Winner: Microsoft Projects offers a slightly more simplified to-do list feature than Hive.

Integrations

Microsoft Project offers a healthy number of integrations for collaboration, most notable with popular Microsoft Office apps Word, Excel, Teams, Outlook, OneNote, and Powerpoint. This allows users to centralize work from multiple apps into one centralized dashboard at the same time.

Hive is very strong with integrations and can connect to third-party applications using the popular Zapier app or native APIs. Some of the more popular apps include Outlook, Salesforce, and Google Drive. Integrations streamline work quickly, for example, a Zoom integration allows users to use video conferencing directly from Hive messaging, eliminating the need to share links to a meeting.

Winner: Hive offers integrations with a lot more apps than Microsoft Project, including the most popular ones (e.g. Google Drive, Salesforce, Slack, Microsoft Teams) and lesser-known ones such as Freshbooks for accounting and Marketo.

Customer Support

Microsoft Project has a wide-reaching project community and support resource page that offers online webinars, documentation, videos, white papers, forums, and tutorials on all things Microsoft Project-related. While chat training is offered, there is a heavy reliance on self-help resources, with customer service numbers or dedicated emails harder to come by.

Hive’s customer support options for all project management software features are more visible than Microsoft Project. Users have the option to connect directly to their sales team using an online form where you can ask about anything from integration features to reports. Hive also offers a dedicated service email (help@hive.com) and an on-site webchat assistant also fields questions from new and repeat visitors.

Users also have the option to sign up for a free trial and request a demo. Hive technology offers personalized demos for all types of businesses. Simply fill out the form on the website with your contact information for a customer service representative to get back to you.

Winner: Hive offers the most generous customer support of the two. In addition to online chats and a dedicated phone line for Teams and Enterprise level users, a sales team is on standby to walk new users through a free demo with separate options to request a free trial.

Pricing

Microsoft Project offers two plans for on-premise solutions that use licenses and three package plans for their cloud services:

• Project Plan 1 ($10 per user per month) offers Microsoft Project’s basic features, including management of projects, tasks, and reports that do not need any advanced features.
• Project Plan 2 ($30 per user per month) includes all of the features of Project Plan 1, with the ability to assign project tasks to resources and use the desktop app, with one license good for up to five PCs per person.
• Project Plan 3 ($55 per user per month) offers all of the features of Project Plan 1 and Project Plan 2 with the addition of enterprise-level analytics and resource management tools.

Both on-premise solutions require a one-time fee and allow access to its desktop app, with one license covering one PC per person. It has a lot more robust features, including the ability to connect with Project Online and Project Service, the offering of advanced analytics to choose project proposals based on strategic goals, and other solutions for larger enterprises.

Hive offers a much more simplified plan and pricing structure than Microsoft Project. It offers three plans paid in monthly or annual installments:

• Solo (free) allows access for up to two users with unlimited service and a community support function. 
• Teams ($12 per user per month) is for unlimited users with unlimited storage and time tracking, with the option to add a-la-carte options such as team resourcing and SSO, enterprise security, and controls for $4 per user per month.
• Enterprise (custom quote) is the most robust, offering all of Teams’ features with the addition of contract and legal review and the most flexible add-on options like team resourcing and the ability to add external users as part of the package.

Winner: Hive is the clear winner in this category, thanks to its overall cheaper cost and ability to add a-la-carte options for a small nominal user fee per month. It does not overcomplicate pricing plans by splitting cloud versus on-premises (desktop licenses) plans like Microsoft Project, making it less overwhelming for new users or smaller companies.

Overall Winner

In the battle of Hive vs Microsoft Project for small to medium size businesses, our nod goes to Hive. Microsoft Project has a gargantuan infrastructure, yet has many limitations, most notably with collaboration and the ability to share files.

Another key consideration is cost. Hive is considerably cheaper on a per-user per month basis.

All in all, Hive is better served for a small to a medium-sized organization that does not want a steep learning curve in learning a new project workflow tool.

Final Thoughts on Microsoft Project vs Hive

Microsoft Project and Hive are two of the most powerful project management tools on the market. Each offers its own advantages and disadvantages when we compare ease of use, project mapping, to-do lists, integrations, customer support, and cost. 

Consider Hive the superior option when it comes to the learning curve, real-time collaboration tools, and overall simplicity with a heavier reliance on cloud-based apps and third-party integrations to bring the workforce closer together.

The services that Hive, ClickUp, Monday, and others offer have become invaluable to good project management. Keeping team members connected, assembling reports, and tracking progress all happen within the software now, as do many other aspects of a business. As a result, choosing the right software is vital.

We’re putting two of the most popular options head to head, ClickUp vs Hive, to see how they stack up. Along the way, you may find that one is the perfect fit for your needs.

Quick Comparison: ClickUp vs Hive

Key Features

ClickUp

Hive

Usability

3.5/5

3/5

Resource Management

4/5

3/5

Collaboration

3.5/5

3/5

Gantt View

3/5

3/5

Customer Support

3/5

2/5

Pricing

3/5

2/5

Pros

• More features on free plan
• Better options for support

• Helpful collaboration tools
• Some simpler features

Cons

• Steep learning curve

• Complicated pricing
• Lack of support

Overall Rating

★★★★★

3.5/5

★★★★★

2.5/5

ClickUp vs Hive

The art of managing projects focuses largely on methodologies, high-level outlines describing how to keep everything organized. Those are undoubtedly important, but perhaps equally as important are the practical tools that make those methodologies possible. These days, the best project management tool is actually good project management software.

Those tools are apps like ClickUp, Hive, and a whole range of other options. Each is designed to support team members by offering features like creating tasks, managing cost, tracking time, and many other types of functionality.

Every project management program tends to have some of the same options for users, with ClickUp and Hive being no exception. To compare the two, we’ll be looking in detail at ClickUp’s adaptability and the Hive technology on offer, and what you’re getting for your money in each case.

Usability

Usability can mean a lot of different things. Does it have the functionality you need and can you find it when you need to? Ease of use is often at odds with the inclusion of all the features you require. Breaking usability down into discrete categories might help keep things clear, including:

1. Ease of use.
2. Integrations.
3. Agile vs traditional methods.

Ease of Use

It’s important that software fits cleanly into your workflow. If you spend more time figuring the apps out than using them, they’re more a hindrance than a help. Both ClickUp and Hive have a similar interface, including a workspace where you can define tasks and connect with team members.

Both should feel intuitive. Task management consists of creating tasks or ‘cards’ and assigning them to team members. Reporting options are easy to access, as are other services. Using some options, like machine learning-driven automation, is more complicated. One issue mentioned frequently in ClickUp user reviews is the learning curve.

Integrations

Both support a wide range of integrations, though many important ones such as Google Drive are only available on pay tiers. ClickUp has a library of ‘native’ integrations that can be added to projects with a few clicks.

Agile vs Traditional

These approaches often require different tools. Both apps allow you to use Kanban boards and other Agile-focused functionality. However, ClickUp creates sprints and has other useful agile tools. With Hive technology, you’ll have to look to integration for those options.

Resource Management

Resources can be many things, and project management software focuses on tasks and time. As a result, the resource they both focus on is workload. Both offers features for tracking resources and creating reports. 

Hive has a resource app that’s available on their pay tier. When task cards are set up with due dates, assignees, and estimates, from the same page you can use the app to:

• Monitor your team’s time.
• Set work limits for individuals.
• Add holidays to your business calendar.

ClickUp has different views which collectively offer the same information. It might be more work, but you’re offered greater flexibility. These features are available, if limited, on every tier. Also available is Pulse, an automation service that offers useful reports for projects.

Collaboration

Communicating effectively is always important, but it becomes more difficult in an era of remote teams all working for the same company. As a result, one important role for this sort of software is fostering team collaboration.

Many of the features are standard, whether you’re looking at ClickUp, Hive, or another option. Commenting on tasks, notes, and elsewhere is possible. A native messaging system includes an inbox. Users can also live chat to keep in contact within the app, rather than using other chat clients. Tasks can have multiple assignees, all communicating through the app.

Hive offers a team inbox, which is useful for direct response marketing and similar efforts. It also allows users to search within comments and messages. To do something similar with ClickUp, you’d have to be using an integration.

If you compare the features, they’re fairly equal. However, as with our ClickUp vs Monday review, ClickUp pulls ahead by offering more at a lower price.

Gantt View

Gantt charts are a foundational tool of project management and are a standard part of this sort of software. Use the tool for tracking workflow, project scheduling, and general project progress.

You can also use them for managing resources and tracking critical paths in important processes. ClickUp and Hive both offer Gantt views to aid in task management, as long as tasks are set up correctly.  

Charts in both apps can also be exported if you’d like to include them in company reports, for example, to reassure clients that their marketing campaign is on time. You can also loop in vendors or other suppliers.

See how ClickUp ranks against apps focused on Gantt charts in our ClickUp vs GanttPro and ClickUp vs TeamGantt reviews.

Customer Support

Decent support can be a critical aspect of both services. They’re complicated enough that most users will probably get lost at some point. As we’ve mentioned, one hit to customer satisfaction is the learning curve. 

That may be less of an issue if you’re part of a larger company, but if you’ve got a small team, you don’t want to spend time working out how to clear notifications or switch views between projects.

Being able to contact a real person for help is one of the premium features in both cases. With ClickUp, users can schedule a meeting with a live rep for coaching over video conferencing.

Hive offers a similar option for chat training. Otherwise, most support is limited to online webinars, documentation, videos, and so forth.

If help docs aren’t enough, ClickUp can connect you with a paid consultant. Hive doesn’t have a lot else to offer.

Pricing

Usually, project management software offers a subscription, including a free plan with limited services. More features come at each tier with a progressively higher cost. Cost is charged per user, paid either annually or monthly. Both Hive and ClickUp pricing follow this pattern, though with some complications thrown in. 

ClickUp offers a great deal of functionality on its free and low-cost plans. Some helpful options do require the more expensive options, including some integration options. Even so, ClickUp is a good option for small businesses or teams.

When you compare to ClickUp, Hive software might seem as if it has a simpler payment structure. There is a free tier for individuals or a small business, and a slightly more expensive business account. 

However, the free version lacks a lot of the features you might be looking for. Additionally, some individual features are only available at an additional cost, ala carte style, even with the business tier.

Overall Winner

ClickUp comfortably comes out ahead in our project management software comparison. When we first put ClickUp vs Hive, it seemed like they were pretty close in many aspects. However, when you take a closer look, ClickUp comes out slightly ahead in every case. The differences add up.

Though it may not matter to every business, ClickUp allows unlimited users even on the free plan. While both offer useful ways to monitor progress, ClickUp has a better way of structuring costs. Both are one of the best project management tools available, but ClickUp just offers more.

Bottom Line on ClickUp vs Hive

Either Hive or ClickUp might be a good fit for your needs. However, if you want to succeed in business you want to find the best option, rather than one that’s just good enough.

The results might depend on your needs, but all things being equal, ClickUp offers the best mix of price and features. Perhaps as importantly, the software also offers enough help that you can figure out how to use all those fancy features, too.