Open Systems Planning for Managing Change

Busy Business People at the Meeting

Open Systems Planning for Managing Change

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

The focus of this topic is to acquaint the reader with the broad principles and approaches in guiding successful change in an organization, including whether it is a team, departmental unit or the overall organization.

The information in those topics is not sufficient to develop competencies in guiding successful significant change. Those competencies comes from extensive experience in applying those types of information.

NOTE: Recently, there have emerged many opinions that Organization Development and change management are two somewhat different disciplines. The opinions are that Organization Development is focused primarily on changing a whole system, for example, a team, departmental unit or organization, while change management is focused on the necessary changes among people in the organization in order to accomplish the overall change in the organization. However, the phrase “change management” is still often associated with the nature of activities to improve an organization, rather than the name of a field or discipline. So this section in this topic in the Library considers change management to be an aspect of Organization Development.


Sections of This Topic Include

Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizational Change

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to Organizational Change. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.


First, What is a System?

One of the biggest breakthroughs in how we understand and guide change in organizations is systems theory and systems thinking. To understand how they are used in organizations, we first must understand a system. Many of us have an intuitive understanding of the term. However, we need to make the understanding explicit in order to use systems thinking and systems tools in organizations.

Simply put, a system is an organized collection of parts (or subsystems) that are highly integrated to accomplish an overall goal. The system has various inputs, which go through certain processes to produce certain outputs, which together, accomplish the overall desired goal for the system. So a system is usually made up of many smaller systems, or subsystems. For example, an organization is made up of many administrative and management functions, products, services, groups and individuals. If one part of the system is changed, the nature of the overall system is often changed, as well — by definition then, the system is systemic, meaning relating to, or affecting, the entire system. (This is not to be confused with systematic, which can mean merely that something is methodological. Thus, methodological thinking — systematic thinking — does not necessarily mean systems thinking.)

Then, What is an Open System?

An open system is a system that regularly exchanges feedback with its external environment. Open systems are systems, of course, so inputs, processes, outputs, goals, assessment and evaluation, and learning are all important. Examples in this topic are social systems, such as teams and organizations. Aspects that are critically important to open systems include the boundaries, external environment and equifinality. Healthy open systems continuously exchange feedback with their environments, analyze that feedback, adjust internal systems as needed to achieve the system’s goals, and then transmit necessary information back out to the environment.

This is in contrast to a closed system in which the system does not interact with its external environment. Employees in a closed organization have no interactions with others outside the organization. Closed organization systems often fail because they get no diversity of perspectives and opinions from outside the organization, including from those that the organization is intended to serve. Consequently, creativity and innovation tends to decrease over time. Those organizations tend to stagnate.

Organizations as Open Systems

So, What is Open Systems Planning?

Open systems planning is a type of strategic change activity (referred to as a type of intervention) by the field of Organization Development. Cummings and Worley, in their book Organization Development and Change (Fifth Edition, p. 171), define open systems planning as “This change method helps organizations and departments to systematically assess their environmental relationships and to plan for improvements interactions. It is intended to help organizations to become more active in relating to their environments.”

In open systems planning, the organization closely examines the external environment, for example, political, economic, societal and technological influences on the organization. That also includes clarifying expectations and influences from stakeholders, for example, customers, collaborators and suppliers. It is critical that the understanding of the external environment as very accurate.

Then it is useful to articulate a vision for how the organization can best operate to take advantage of opportunities and ward of threats based on that external information. Then the organization identifies strategies and actions to best align itself to achieve that vision. It is critical that key personnel in the organization have a common perception of the external information, the vision for alignment, and the actions needed to make that alignment.

One of the best tools for starting open systems planning is to do a logic model of the organizational system. See the diagram in this document: What is an Open System?


Also See These Closely Related Topics


Additional Library Resources in the Category of Organizational
Change and Development


Large-Scale Interventions for Organizational Change

Group of People Gathered Around Wooden Table in a Meeting

Large-Scale Interventions for Organizational Change

Sections of This Topic Include

General Resources

Also consider
Related Library Topics

Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Large-Scale Interventions

In addition to the articles on this current page, also see the following blogs that have posts related to Large-Scale Interventions. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog. The blog also links to numerous free related resources.


Overview of Large-Scale Interventions

The field of Organization Development sees large-scale organizational change as being across most or all of an organization. However, with the recent focus on transformational — fundamental and radical — change, practitioners often refer to large-scale interventions as means to accomplish transformational change. Types of large-scale interventions are also referred to as whole systems models.

In Leading Large Scale Change: A Practical Guide, the authors define large-scale change as “the process of mobilising a large collection of individuals, groups and organisations toward a vision of a fundamentally new future state, by means of:
• Key themes that can make a big difference
• A shift in power and a more distributed leadership
• Comprehensive and active engagement of stakeholders
• Mutually reinforcing changes in multiple systems and processes”

The following links gives a broad overview of various large-scale interventions.

Some Specific Large-Scale Interventions

The following might be considered examples of large-scale intervention techniques, although there certainly has been argument about what technically qualifies as such an intervention.

General Resources

Also consider
Communication Is The Key To Successfully Implementing Any Large-scale Organizational Change


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Improving Organizations: Guidelines, Methods and Resources for Organizational Change Agents

Colleagues working Together

Improving/Changing Organizations: Guidelines, Methods and Resources for Organizational Change Agents

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

Suggested Pre-Reading

Organizational Performance Management

Sections of This Topic Include

Overview of Organizational Change

Undergoing Organizational Change

General Resources


Description

(Be sure to read the description in Organizational Performance Management to understand where organizational change typically fits into the cycle of activities in ensuring strong performance in an organization.)

Organizations are rapidly changing like never before. Numerous driving forces are causing these changes, including increasing markets and associated competition, increasing expectations of transparency and accountability, and an increasingly diverse workforce.

As a result, leaders and managers are having to learn about guiding and supporting significant change within their own organizations. It is difficult to find a management book today that does not include the topic of change.

The purpose of the first section in this topic is to give you a broad overview of organizational change so that you will have a meaningful context in which to undergo your own change efforts. The next section is more of a “how to” in understanding how to plan and implement a change effort.

However, that new information will not evolve into actual knowledge and skills unless you continue to practice applying it. That next section refers to a process called collaborative consulting that has been proven to be successful in guiding and supporting others to successfully implement systems for long-lasting, successful change.


OVERVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE

Understanding the Nature of Organizational Change

What is a Change Agent?

A change agent is the person or team who’s currently responsible for the overall change effort. It could be different people at different times during the change. For example, it could be a champion for change who encourages the change. Then it could be an expert on change who plans the change. Then it could be the leader in the organization who drives the change.

Clearing Up Terms and Language About Organizational Change and Development

There are several phrases regarding organizational change and development that look and sound a lot alike, but have different meanings. As a result, there seems to be increasingly different interpretations of some of the phrases, while others are used interchangeably. Without at least some sense of the differences, communications about organizational change and development can be confusing and frustrating.
Cleaning Up the Language About Organizational Change and Development

Why the Word “Change” is Heard So Often

See a video about various driving forces causing major changes in organizations, including in their cultures and structures, and in how they are governed, led and managed. This affects consultants, as well. From the Consultants Development Institute.

Many people argue that organizations are changing like never before. Some of those changes are planned to be accomplished over a long period. However, organizational change is often provoked by some major driving force, for example, a public relations crisis, sudden opportunity in markets, dramatic reduction in profits or new Chief Executive Officer with a very different leadership style.

The subject of organizational change has reached evangelical proportions. There is seemingly an explosion of literature about the subject and an accompanying explosion in the amount of consultants who offer services in this general area.

See a video about language about change, types of change, barriers to change, overcoming
barriers, phases in change, priorities in each phase and models for change.
From the Consultants
Development Institute
.

When people struggle to accomplish successful organizational change – whether in for-profit, nonprofit or government organizations – it is often because they do not understand the nature of organizational change, types of change, barriers to change, how to overcome the barriers, major phases in proceeding through change, various models for planning and guiding change, and types of approaches (interventions) to implement successful change. That is the focus of this topic in this Library.


Major Types of Organizational Change

Organizational change can seem like such a vague phenomena unless you can think of change in terms of the various types of change. There are different types, including the scope, pace, urgency and style of the planning for change.

Organization-wide Versus Subsystem Change

Examples of organization-wide change are an organizational redesign and change in overall strategies. Experts assert that successful organization-wide change requires a change in culture – cultural change is another example of organization-wide change. Those examples change the entire organizational system.

Organizations have many subsystems, as well. Examples of a change in a subsystem include removal or addition of a product or service and reorganization of a certain department.

Transformational Versus Incremental Change

Transformational change is a radical and fundamental shift in the way the entire organization operates. Transformational change is sometimes referred to as quantum change. An example is changing the culture from the traditional top-down, hierarchical style of leadership to a network of self-directing teams. Another example is using Business Process Re-engineering to take apart all the parts of the organization and then put them back together in a more optimal fashion.

In contrast, incremental change is making small adjustments over time to improve the performance of the organization usually by increasing efficiencies in various processes, such as in refining product development and delivery and in reducing labor costs through attrition.

Remedial Versus Developmental Change

Change can be intended to remedy a current situation, for example, to improve the poor performance of a product, reduce burnout in the workplace, become much more proactive and less reactive, or address large budget deficits. Remedial projects often seem quite focused and urgent because they are addressing a current, major problem. It is often easier to determine the success of these projects because the problem has been solved or not.

Change also can be developmental – to make a successful situation even better, for example, to expand the amount of customers served or duplicate successful products and services. Developmental projects can seem more diffuse and long-term, depending on how specific and important the goals are for the change.

Unplanned Versus Planned Change

Unplanned change can happen when a sudden crisis occurs in the organization that can cause its members to respond in a highly reactive and disorganized fashion. Examples are when the Chief Executive Officer suddenly leaves the organization or a significant public relations problem occurs.

Planned change occurs when leaders in the organization recognize the need for a major change and proactively organize a plan to accomplish the change. Examples are strategic planning that is focused on truly strategic topics and succession planning for key leaders in the organization.




Additional Perspectives


Why Change Can Be Difficult to Accomplish

Change can be difficult for you and your client to accomplish for a variety of reasons.

  • People are afraid of the unknown. They communicate their fear through direct means, such as complaining about the plans for change. Or, they communicate their fear indirectly, for example, coming late to meetings and not taking agreed-upon actions.
  • People think things are just fine. This might occur if the executives in the organization have not adequately communicated the need for the change.
  • People are inherently cynical about change. This cynicism often occurs if earlier attempts at change were unsuccessful and it was not admitted to the employees.
  • People doubt there are effective means to accomplish successful change. They may have read publications in which writers assert that most organizational change efforts fail.
  • There may be conflicting goals in the organizational change effort. A conflicting goal might be, for example, to significantly increase resources to accomplish change, yet substantially cut costs to remain viable. That conflict can occur, especially if employees were not involved in the plans for the change.
  • Change often goes against values held dear by members in the organization. For example, they might disagree that the organization should maximize profits more than contribute to their community. This situation is not uncommon, particularly in nonprofit organizations.
  • People get burned out during the change effort. Organizational change usually takes longer to achieve than most people expect. This problem can occur if the question “Is this realistic?” was not continually asked and if an insufficient number of staff were not involved in the planning.
  • Key leaders leave the organization. Especially in smaller organizations or organizations with very limited resources, leaders might not believe they are receiving sufficient value for what they are investing in the organization. They might conclude that it is better to just leave. Or, the change may not be going as expected, and the leaders are asked to leave.
  • Participants do not understand the nature of planned change. Frequently, participants expect the change to be according to a well-designed, well-organized effort that has few surprises. When surprises do occur, they lose faith in the change effort and seek to abandon it.
  • The relationship between the consultant and the client “sours.” The relationship can deteriorate, especially if the client does not want to change or if the project struggles because of one or more of the above-listed barriers to change.

You can overcome many of those barriers if your consulting project meets the requirements for successful change listed below.





Requirements for Successful Organizational Change

Cummings and Worley, in their book Organizational Change and Development (Fifth Edition, West Publishing, 1993), describe a comprehensive, five-phase, general process for managing change, including: 1) motivating change, 2) creating vision, 3) developing political support, 4) managing the transition and 5) sustaining momentum. That process seems suitable for organizing and describing general guidelines about managing change.

Whatever model you choose to use when guiding organizational change, that model should include the priorities and areas of emphasis described in the following five phases of change.

Motivating Change

This phase includes creating a readiness for change in your client’s organization and developing approaches to overcome resistance to change. General guidelines for managing this phase include enlightening members of the organization about the need for change, expressing the current status of the organization and where it needs to be in the future, and developing realistic approaches about how change might be accomplished.

Next, organization leaders need to recognize that people in the organization are likely to resist making major changes for a variety of reasons, including fear of the unknown, inadequacy to deal with the change and whether the change will result in adverse effects on their jobs. People need to feel that their concerns are being heard. Leaders must widely communicate the need for the change and how the change can be accomplished successfully. Leaders must listen to the employees – people need to feel that the approach to change will include their strong input and ongoing involvement.

Creating Vision

Leaders in the organization must articulate a clear vision that describes what the change effort will accomplish. It should readily convey the benefits to the employees, as well. Ideally, people in the organization have strong input to the creation of the vision and how it can be achieved. It is critically important that people believe that the vision is relevant and realistic.

Research indicates that cynicism is increasing in organizations in regard to change efforts. People do not want their leaders to promote an idealized vision that will completely turn the organization around and make things better for everyone all the time. They want to feel respected enough by their leaders to be involved and to work toward a vision that is realistic, yet promising and rewarding in the long run.

Developing Political Support

This phase of change management is often overlooked, yet it is the phase that often stops successful change from occurring. Politics in organizations is about power. Power is important among members of the organization when striving for the resources and influence necessary to successfully carry out their jobs. Power is also important when striving to implement a plan in which everyone is involved. Power comes from the authority of one’s position in the organization. Power also comes from credibility, whether from strong expertise or integrity.

Some people have a strong negative reaction when talking about power because power too often is associated with negative applications, for example, manipulation, abuse or harassment. However, power exists in all human interactions and is not always bad. It is how the power is used that determines how the power is perceived.

A strong mechanism for ensuring political support for the change effort is to develop a network of leaders at various levels who interact and count on each other to support and guide the change effort. Means to do that can include ensuring that all power-players are involved in recognizing the need for change, developing the vision and methods to achieve the vision, and maintaining organization-wide communications about the status of change. Any recommendations or concerns expressed by members to the leaders must be promptly recognized and addressed.

Managing Transition

This phase occurs when the organization works to make the actual transition from the current state to the desired future state or vision. In consultations, this phase usually is called the implementation phase. The ways that consultants and organizations go through this phase can vary widely, ranging from clearly delineated phases and steps to a continual mutual engagement with the client from which the project activities continue to unfold. See How Consultants Customize Their Approaches.

Conventionally, it includes implementing a variety of “interventions” designed to make the necessary change in the organization, ranging from strategic planning, leadership development and team building to whole-systems change, strategic restructuring and cultural change.

Ideally, the various interventions are detailed into associated actions that are integrated into one overall Implementation Plan. If the change is deep and extensive, then each action plan would includes specific objectives, or milestones, that must be accomplished by various deadlines, along with responsibilities for achieving each objective. Rarely are these plans implemented exactly as planned. Thus, as important as developing the plan, is making the many ongoing adjustments to the plan while keeping other members up-to-date about the changes and the reasons for them.

These changes might require ongoing coaching, training and enforcement of new policies and procedures in the workplace. In addition, means of effective change management must continue, including strong, clear, ongoing communications about the need for the change and status of the change.

Sustaining Momentum

Often, the most difficult phase in managing change is this phase when leaders work to sustain the momentum of the implementation and adjustment of plans. Change efforts can encounter a wide variety of obstacles, for example, strong resistance from members of the organization or unexpected changes in the environment outside the organization. Client resistance can be expected because organizational change requires a change in behaviors, which can be very difficult. Authentic responses to the resistance can be very effective. See Authenticity — How to Remain Authentic With Yourself and Others.

The role of support cannot be minimized. Despite its importance during organizational change, the role of support is often forgotten. Strong, visible, ongoing support from top leadership is critically important to show overall credibility and accountabilities in the change effort.

Supervisors play a critical role in effectively delegating tasks to employees and providing ongoing support in the form of feedback, coaching and training. Employee performance management plays a key role in ensuring that the required actions are being taken at the right times and are being done with high quality.

At this point in a consulting project, it may be wise for the consultant to ensure he or she has ongoing support themselves (for example, from other consultants) who can provide ongoing objectivity, affirmation and other forms of support.

Additional Perspectives

The following links are to articles that together provide an increasingly comprehensive and detailed orientation to change management.





Various Organizational Change Models

See a video about models for change, roles during change, interventions, how choose them and principles for changing systems. From the Consultants Development Institute.

The purposes of an organizational change model are to 1) provide guidance to leaders of the change effort and 2) give a common perspective and frame of reference for participants when communicating about their change effort. The following paragraphs provide a general overview of some of the more prominent change models. The purpose of the overviews is to increase your general knowledge about approaches to change and help you grasp the diversity of approaches. The overviews are not intended to provide you detailed guidelines about implementing any of the models.

Note that there are many other change models, many of them formed by modifying the well-known models, such as Kurt Lewin’s action research. Also note that, because there is no standard definition for a change model, some readers might consider some of the following to be standard management practices, rather than means to affect change.

Unfreeze, Move, Refreeze

Lewin’s model is probably the most well known. Its simple, but powerful, premise is that to change a system, you first have to “unfreeze,” or loosen up those structures and influences that currently hold the system together. Without attention to those factors, the actions to accomplish desired changes are not likely to be successful because they will continue to encounter strong resistance from members of the organization.

Structures can be loosened in a variety of ways. The means mentioned in the above section Requirements for Successful Organizational Change about motivating change and creating a vision are powerful for unfreezing an organization. The next general phase in this model is about moving the change along, including by developing political support as described in the above section. The final phase is about developing and implementing new structures, such as new plans, policies and procedures, which freeze, or hold, the current state of change in place. The means mentioned in the above section about managing the transition and sustaining momentum would be very useful in refreezing the intended changes.

Lewin’s 3-Stage Model of Change

Action Research

Lewin’s action research model is based on an overall cycle of 1) clarifying the current problem in the system, 2) involving a specialist or consultant, 3) gathering data and diagnosing the situation, 4) providing feedback to people in the system, 5) incorporating members’ feedback to further clarify the problem and its causes, 6) developing action plans to address the problem, 7) taking those actions and 8) gathering data to assess the effects on the problem. The cycle can also generate tremendous learning for those involved.

Many models for consulting are based on action research and include various modifications. They include, for example, more involvement of members of the organization in the process, and less focus on “diagnosis” and more focus on joint discovery. There is also more focus on strengths and opportunities and less on weaknesses and problems, as well as more focus on learning.

Action Research

Business Process Reengineering (BPR)

This method aims to increase organizational performance by radically re-designing the organization’s structures and processes — by starting over from the ground up. As with any major model for change, there are many proponents and opponents of BPR. BPR can require an extensive amount of detail, attention and time and can be quite demanding on employees.

Still, the process might be one of few that provides clear guidelines and procedures for carefully dissembling and assembling an organization. The model, like Future Search Conference (below) and Whole Systems Change, really forces leaders to take a complete, fresh look at systems in their organization and how to re-develop those systems anew.

Business Process Re-Engineering

Future Search Conference

Marvin Weisbord developed the future search approach, which can involve 30-100 people or more, usually over three days, to articulate a preferred future and develop the action steps to accomplish that future. It is an example of a relatively recent category of change models called large-scale interventions. Large-scale change is an example of transformational, organization-wide change.

In the approach, a consultant works with a small planning group to design the event. All key internal and external stakeholders are encouraged to attend. Participants examine the past, present and future of the organization from the perspective of the participants themselves, the organization and its industry. Participants discover their shared values and assumptions to clarify a preferred future or vision. The vision emerges from various scenarios, built from considering what has worked and what has not worked in the past — but especially what has worked. Short-term and long-term action plans are established. Emphasis is on building to the desired future, rather than on solving problems.

Future Search Conference in Theory and Practice

McKinsey 7S Model

The model was developed by Watermann and Peters and depicts seven dimensions of organizations that must be considered when accomplishing organizational change. Imagine a circle of six circles with one circle in the middle. The middle circle is labeled “shared values.” Shared values represent the overall priorities in how the organization chooses to operate. The six outer circles include “strategy,” “structure,” “systems,” “skills,” “staff” and “style.” The point of the model is that an effective organization has to accomplish a fit between all seven S’s, and to realize that a change in any one of the seven dimensions will effect a change in all others.

Strategy is the overall direction of the organization and how it is going to follow that direction. Structure is the organization of the company, defining its roles and lines of authority. Systems include the processes and procedures that guide day-to-day activities in the organization. These three are the hard S’s.

Skills are the capabilities of the organization. Staff includes the organization’s people and how their expertise is utilized. Style is how the organization is led. These three are the soft S’s.

McKinsey 7S Framework

Various Additional Models





Major Roles During Successful Organizational Change

The process of organizational change can include a variety of key roles. These roles can be filled by various individuals or teams at various times during the change process. Sometimes, individuals or teams can fill more than one role.

Change Initiator

It is conventional wisdom among organizational development consultants that successful change is often provoked by a deep “hurt” or crisis in the organization, for example, dramatic reduction in sales, loss of a key leader in the organization, warnings from a major investor, or even actions of a key competitor. It is not uncommon then that someone inside the organization reacts to that deep hurt and suggests the need for a major change effort. Often the person who initiates the change is not the person who becomes the primary change agent.

Change Agent

A change agent is the person or team who’s currently responsible for the overall change effort. It could be different people at different times during the change. For example, it could be a champion for change who encourages the change. Then it could be an expert on change who plans the change. Then it could be the leader in the organization who drives the change.

After the project plan has been developed and begins implementation, the change agent might be an implementation team comprised of various people from across the organization. If the change effort stalls out, the change agent might be a top leader in the organization who intercedes to ensure the change process continues in a timely fashion.

It is extremely important for the consultant to always know who the real change agent is at any time during the project because that person or team usually has the most influence on the success of the project, and therefore is the most important role to be working with then.

Champion for Change

Change efforts often require a person or team to continue to sustain strong enthusiasm about the change. This includes reminding everyone of why the change is occurring in the first place, and the many benefits that could come if it is successful. The champion might be the same person as the change agent at various times in the project.

Sponsor of Change

Usually, there is a one key internal person or department that is officially the “sponsor,” or the official role responsible for the success of the change process. In large organizations, that sponsor often is a department, such as Human Resources, Strategic Planning or Organization Development. In smaller organizations, the sponsor might be a team of senior leaders working to ensure that the change effort stays on schedule and is sustained by ongoing provision of resources and training.

Leadership, Supervision and Delegation

Leadership could defined as setting direction and influencing people to follow that direction. A person can lead themselves, other individuals, other groups or an entire organization. Supervision is a leadership role and is guiding the development and productivity of their direct reports in the organization. Effective supervisors are able to achieve goals by guiding the work of other people – by delegating.

Note that supervisors exist throughout an organization, depending on its particular structure. For example, the Board of Directors supervises the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), the CEO supervises middle managers and middle managers supervise entry-level supervisors.

The topic of leadership has become one of the most prominent topics in all of management literature today. It is almost impossible to find a general management book that does not include frequent mention of the topic of leadership. There are a variety of reasons for this, one of the most important being that successful organizational change requires strong, ongoing and visible leadership in support of that change. Leaders must model the type of behaviors that they want to see in their organization. Other reasons include:

  • Leaders must ensure that desired results are clarified and widely communicated, including to define the vision and goals.
  • Leaders in the organization must “walk their talk.” They must behave according to the same values and behaviors that are needed during the change effort.
  • Leaders must ensure the ongoing accountabilities, resources and support to ensure that actions are taken to accomplish the overall change effort.

There simply is no substitute for the role that leadership and supervision play in accomplishing successful organizational change. Thus, it is extremely important that leaders and supervisors in the organization have a strong understanding of basic principles of successful change in organizations.

Additional Perspective

How to Know When to Facilitate, Train or Coach





Do Most Organizational Change Efforts Fail?

Since the early 1990s, there has been a common assertion that 70% of change efforts fail. That statistic has been mentioned by prominent people and organizations in the field, including John Kotter, Michael Hammer and James Champy, Michael Beer and Nitin Nohria, McKinsey & Company and the Harvard Business Review.

It has been used a powerful motivator for further research in organizational change, more innovation in models for change, and more commitment from leaders in making change actually happen.

However, many are skeptical of that assertion. They cite the lack of valid research that concludes that finding. They mention numerous examples of success stories about change. Some assert that it is mostly independent consultants (those who are not employees of their client’s organization) who believe that statistic, while internal consultants believe that change is mostly successful.

Regardless of the opinions about the validity of the statistic, it is a significant topic to examine when talking about organizational change. Here are a variety of opinions for and against the statistic.

Assertions That Most Fail

Doubts About Those Assertions


UNDERGOING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE


Collaborative Consulting Skills for Accomplishing Significant Change

Research over the years has found that the most successful approach to accomplishing long-lasting, successful change in organizations is to use a highly collaborative approach in working with the members of the organization to implement that change. That approach, including its nature and various phases, is fully explained in the Library’s topic:
Collaborative Consulting for Performance, Change and Learning

Before selecting appropriate strategies for change below, you and your client should have done the necessary activities in the contracting phase of the consulting process, especially to ensure the client’s readiness for change. You also should have done the discovery phase, especially to identify the causes from the symptoms of the client’s problem.

How to Choose Which Strategies (Interventions) to Use for Change

See a video about where consultants should focus, where clients should focus, where projects should focus and core components of change plans. From the Consultants Development Institute.

Preparation

There are a wide variety of strategies often referred to as “interventions” to use to guide successful change in organizations. There is no unique intervention to use for each different situation in an organization. However, there are some key considerations when selecting from among the many choices. (The term “intervention”, unlike the term “strategy”, has its detractors. Thus, this topic in the Library often refers to strategies.)

Also, before you and your client select the best type of strategies, be aware of your strong biases about how you view organizations. Without recognizing those biases, you might favor certain types of strategies primarily because those are the only ones you can readily see and understand, even if other types of strategies might be much more effective in your project.
Understand the Preferred Lens Through Which You View Organizations

Now, Select the Best Category of Interventions

With your client, discuss the findings from your research in the discovery phase. For example, did it suggest problems primarily among how individuals and groups got along with each other? Lack of strong internal practices to support growth? Lack of performance among many employees and teams? Need for an effective response to rapid changes inside and/or outside the organization?

Then read the introductions to each of the four categories of interventions in the section below to find the most likely category of interventions to use. Then select the category that seems to most closely match the nature of your findings. (If you and your client had selected a particular change management model, then that model might suggest a certain strategy for accomplishing the change.)

The choice need not be the best one right away. If you and your client work collaboratively, always respectfully and honestly sharing impressions of the activities in the project and reflecting on what they are learning, then you will end up using the best interventions.


Categories of Possible Strategies (Interventions) to Use for Change

For the sake of clarity and understanding, the following interventions are categorized. The four major categories are from Cummings and Worley, in their book Organizational Change and Development (West Publishing, 1993). The following interventions are often highly integrated with each other during a project for change.

Before selecting your interventions below, it might be interesting now to consider an alternative perspective about selecting categories of interventions. In the article below, Edgar Schein, the developer of process consultation, a very meaningful and widely respected process for collaborating with clients to guide and support change, wonders how useful it really is to try categorize interventions. He ventures that it might be most useful instead to reflect on what emerges from continuing to help the client, rather than on which category of interventions to choose from.
Can One Develop a Useful Typology of Interventions? (see the 3rd page)

Human Process Interventions (Group and Individual Human Relations)

The following human process interventions might be particularly helpful during change projects in organizations where, for example, there are many new employees, different cultures working together, many complaints among organizational members, extensive low morale, very high turnover and/or ineffective teams.

Guiding Individuals

Group-Based

Technostructural Interventions (Structures, Technologies, Positions, etc.)

The following technostructural interventions might be particularly helpful in situations having, for example, rapid growth but few internal systems to sustain that growth, much confusion about roles, a strong need to soon learn a major new technology or process and/or many internal operational systems that must soon be implemented.

Human Resource Management Interventions (Individual and Group Performance
Management)

The following human resource interventions might be particularly helpful in situations where, for example, new organizational goals have been established, many new employees have been hired, individual and team goals do not get achieved, plans do not get implemented and/or there is rapid turnover.

Employee Performance Management

Employee Development

Employee Wellness Programs

Strategic Interventions (Organization and Its External Environment)

The following strategic interventions might be particularly helpful in situations where, for example, there are rapid changes in the external environment, significantly increased competition, rapid expansion of markets, a likely merger or acquisition, and/or need for a comprehensive change throughout the organization.


Now Select the Best Strategy or Intervention in That Category

Now that you have selected the most appropriate category of strategies with your client, discuss which strategy most closely matches your findings from the discovery. Again, if your choice is not the best one right away, then if you and your client have been working collaboratively, you will end up using the best strategy. Consider the following questions about your selected strategy.

  1. Does the nature of that strategy match the culture of your client’s organization? The best way to find out is to discuss the strategy with members of the organization.
  2. Do you and your client have the ability to implement that strategy? For example, the categories of technostructural and strategic interventions often require rather technical expertise in organizational design.
  3. Does the strategy suggest what actions are needed in order to implement it? For example, the strategy of strategic management might suggest a SWOT analysis, identifying strategic goals, developing action plans for each goal and then implementing the action plans.
  4. Does the strategy require more time to conduct than the time available to implement it? For example, a cash crisis requires immediate attention, so while a comprehensive strategic planning process might ultimately be useful, the time to develop and implement a strategic plan is impractical.
  5. Does your client’s organization have the necessary resources to implement the strategy? Consider resources such as expertise, funding and facilities.

The following articles provide another set of considerations when selecting strategies (interventions).


Other Organizations’ General Lists of Interventions

The following are lists offered by other organizations and professionals in the field, and are not from those in the Cummings and Worley book, Organizational Change and Development (West Publishing, 1993), as listed above.


Implementing Strategies for Organizational Change — Finish Phases in Consulting

Now that you and your client have selected a strategy to accomplish long-lasting, significant change in the organization, it is time to implement that strategy. One of the best approaches is to continue following the general phases in a collaborative consulting process. This topic assumes that you have already completed the contracting and discovery phases.

Next, you would evolve into the action planning phase in order to begin detailing how to implement the strategy that you and your client selected. While doing this, you would begin to integrate the principles for successful organizational change that were explained above in this topic.

After detailing the action plans, you would begin the implementation phase to implement the action plans, while concurrently managing the change. The guidelines in the description of that phase share some basics about managing change.

After the implementation, you would conduct the project evaluation phase to conclude if the client’s problem had been solved; if the client had implemented the necessary systems to avoid that kind of problem in the future; and if the client did encounter that type of problem, then they would be able to solve it themselves.

If those indicators of success were achieved, then you and your client would evolve into the project termination phase in which you would work to accomplish both an administrative and ethical closure to the project.


GENERAL RESOURCES

Miscellaneous: Other Business and Management Topics to Round Out Knowledge

Consider


Additional Perspectives on Change


Also See These Closely Related Topics


General Resources

Service Organizations Focused on Organizational Change and Development

Online Groups

Toolkits, Etc.

Bibliographies of Books About Change Management

Here’s several lists of books about OD, some of them seminal and foundational books.
Books about OD and organizational change.


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizational Change

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to organizational change. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.


Additional Library Resources in the Category of Organizational Change and Development


How to Change Organizational Culture

People Sitting beside Wooden Table

How to Change Organizational Culture

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

The focus of this topic is to acquaint the reader with the broad principles and approaches in changing the culture of an organization, including whether it is a team, departmental unit or the overall organization.

The information in those topics is not sufficient to develop competencies in changing organizational culture. Those competencies comes from extensive
experience in applying those types of information.


Strongly Suggested Pre-Reading

Guidelines, Methods and Resources for Organizational Change Agents

Sections of This Topic Include

Also consider

Related Library Topics


What is Organizational Culture?

Basically, organizational culture is the personality of the organization. Culture is comprised of the assumptions, values, norms and tangible signs (artifacts) of organization members and their behaviors. Members of an organization soon come to sense the particular culture of an organization. Culture is one of those terms that’s difficult to express distinctly, but everyone knows it when they sense it. For example, the culture of a large, for-profit corporation is quite different than that of a hospital which is quite different than that of a university. You can tell the culture of an organization by looking at the arrangement of furniture, what they brag about, what members wear, etc. — similar to what you can use to get a feeling about someone’s personality.

Corporate culture can be looked at as a system. Inputs include feedback from, e.g., society, professions, laws, stories, heroes, values on competition or service, etc. The process is based on our assumptions, values and norms, e.g., our values on money, time, facilities, space and people. Outputs or effects of our culture are, e.g., organizational behaviors, technologies, strategies, image, products, services, appearance, etc.

The concept of culture is particularly important when attempting to manage organization-wide change. Practitioners are coming to realize that, despite the best-laid plans, organizational change must include not only changing structures and processes, but also changing the corporate culture as well.

How to Change Organizational Culture

Cultural change is a form of transformational organizational change, which is is a radical and fundamental shift in the way the entire organization operates. It is also classified as a strategic intervention, which is particularly helpful in situations where, for example, there are rapid changes in the external environment, significantly increased competition, rapid expansion of markets, a likely merger or acquisition, and/or need for a comprehensive change throughout the organization.

The complete and careful guidelines to change the culture of an organization are the same as those explained in the suggested pre-reading: Guidelines, Methods and Resources for Organizational Change Agents

However, those guidelines are embellished with various perspectives on how to change the culture in an organization. See Additional Perspectives on Changing Organizational Culture below.

Various Models to Guide the Change

See a video about models for change, roles during change, interventions, how choose them and principles for changing systems. From the Consultants Development Institute.

The purposes of an organizational change model are to 1) provide guidance to leaders of the change effort and 2) give a common perspective and frame of reference for participants when communicating about their change effort. The following paragraphs provide a general overview of some of the more prominent change models. The purpose of the overviews is to increase your general knowledge about approaches to change and help you grasp the diversity of approaches. The overviews are not intended to provide you detailed guidelines about implementing any of the models.

Note that there are many other change models, many of them formed by modifying the well-known models, such as Kurt Lewin’s action research. Also note that, because there is no standard definition for a change model, some readers might consider some of the following to be standard management practices, rather than means to affect change.

Unfreeze, Move, Refreeze

Lewin’s model is probably the most well known. Its simple, but powerful, premise is that to change a system, you first have to “unfreeze,” or loosen up those structures and influences that currently hold the system together. Without attention to those factors, the actions to accomplish desired changes are not likely to be successful because they will continue to encounter strong resistance from members of the organization.

Structures can be loosened in a variety of ways. The means mentioned in the above section Requirements for Successful Organizational Change about motivating change and creating a vision are powerful for unfreezing an organization. The next general phase in this model is about moving the change along, including by developing political support as described in the above section. The final phase is about developing and implementing new structures, such as new plans, policies and procedures, which freeze, or hold, the current state of change in place. The means mentioned in the above section about managing the transition and sustaining momentum would be very useful in refreezing the intended changes.

Lewin’s 3-Stage Model of Change

Action Research

Lewin’s action research model is based on an overall cycle of 1) clarifying the current problem in the system, 2) involving a specialist or consultant, 3) gathering data and diagnosing the situation, 4) providing feedback to people in the system, 5) incorporating members’ feedback to further clarify the problem and its causes, 6) developing action plans to address the problem, 7) taking those actions and 8) gathering data to assess the effects on the problem. The cycle can also generate tremendous learning for those involved.

Many models for consulting are based on action research and include various modifications. They include, for example, more involvement of members of the organization in the process, and less focus on “diagnosis” and more focus on joint discovery. There is also more focus on strengths and opportunities and less on weaknesses and problems, as well as more focus on learning.

Action Research

Business Process Reengineering (BPR)

This method aims to increase organizational performance by radically re-designing the organization’s structures and processes — by starting over from the ground up. As with any major model for change, there are many proponents and opponents of BPR. BPR can require an extensive amount of detail, attention and time and can be quite demanding on employees.

Still, the process might be one of few that provides clear guidelines and procedures for carefully dissembling and assembling an organization. The model, like Future Search Conference (below) and Whole Systems Change, really forces leaders to take a complete, fresh look at systems in their organization and how to re-develop those systems anew.

Business Process Re-Engineering

Future Search Conference

Marvin Weisbord developed the future search approach, which can involve 30-100 people or more, usually over three days, to articulate a preferred future and develop the action steps to accomplish that future. It is an example of a relatively recent category of change models called large-scale interventions. Large-scale change is an example of transformational, organization-wide change.

In the approach, a consultant works with a small planning group to design the event. All key internal and external stakeholders are encouraged to attend. Participants examine the past, present and future of the organization from the perspective of the participants themselves, the organization and its industry. Participants discover their shared values and assumptions to clarify a preferred future or vision. The vision emerges from various scenarios, built from considering what has worked and what has not worked in the past — but especially what has worked. Short-term and long-term action plans are established. Emphasis is on building to the desired future, rather than on solving problems.

Future Search Conference in Theory and Practice

McKinsey 7S Model

The model was developed by Watermann and Peters and depicts seven dimensions of organizations that must be considered when accomplishing organizational change. Imagine a circle of six circles with one circle in the middle. The middle circle is labeled “shared values.” Shared values represent the overall priorities in how the organization chooses to operate. The six outer circles include “strategy,” “structure,” “systems,” “skills,” “staff” and “style.” The point of the model is that an effective organization has to accomplish a fit between all seven S’s, and to realize that a change in any one of the seven dimensions will effect a change in all others.

Strategy is the overall direction of the organization and how it is going to follow that direction. Structure is the organization of the company, defining its roles and lines of authority. Systems include the processes and procedures that guide day-to-day activities in the organization. These three are the hard S’s.

Skills are the capabilities of the organization. Staff includes the organization’s people and how their expertise is utilized. Style is how the organization is led. These three are the soft S’s.

McKinsey 7S Framework

Various Additional Models

Additional Perspectives on Changing Organizational Culture


Also See These Closely Related Topics


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizational Change

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to Organizational Change. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.


Additional Library Resources in the Category of Organizational
Change and Development


Basic Context for Organizational Change

Disaster-protection-down-row-danger-failure

Basic Context for Organizational Change

Much of the content
of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC, experts in organizational change.

It seems like the topic of organizational change has reached evangelical proportions. There’s an explosion of literature about the subject and an accompanying explosion in the number of consultants who offer services in this general area. The following information attempts to provide some basic perspective about the concept of organizational change. (See the and listed at the end of this article.)

Sections of This Topic Include

Also consider
Related Library Topics

Learn More in the Library’s Blog Related to Organizational Change (Change Management)

In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blog which has posts related to Organizational Change (Change Management). Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.


What’s “Organizational Change?”

Typically, the concept of organizational change is in regard to organization-wide change, as opposed to smaller changes such as adding a new person, modifying a program, etc. Examples of organization-wide change might include a change in mission, restructuring operations (e.g., restructuring to self-managed teams, layoffs, etc.), new technologies, mergers, major collaborations, “rightsizing”, new programs such as Total Quality Management, re-engineering, etc. Some experts refer to organizational transformation. Often this term designates a fundamental and radical reorientation in the way the organization operates.

What Provokes “Organizational Change”?

Change should not be done for the sake of change — it’s a strategy to accomplish some overall goal. (See Organizational Performance Management.) Usually organizational change is provoked by some major outside driving force, e.g., substantial cuts in funding, address major new markets/clients, need for dramatic increases in productivity/services, etc. Typically, organizations must undertake organization-wide change to evolve to a different level in their life cycle, e.g., going from a highly reactive, entrepreneurial organization to more stable and planned development. Transition to a new chief executive can provoke organization-wide change when his or her new and unique personality pervades the entire organization.

Why is Organization-Wide Change Difficult to Accomplish?

Typically there are strong resistances to change. People are afraid of the unknown. Many people think things are already just fine and don’t understand the need for change. Many are inherently cynical about change, particularly from reading about the notion of “change” as if it’s a mantra. Many doubt there are effective means to accomplish major organizational change. Often there are conflicting goals in the organization, e.g., to increase resources to accomplish the change yet concurrently cut costs to remain viable. Organization-wide change often goes against the very values held dear by members in the organization, that is, the change may go against how members believe things should be done. That’s why much of organizational-change literature discusses needed changes in the culture of the organization, including changes in members’ values and beliefs and in the way they enact these values and beliefs.

How Is Organization-Wide Change Best Carried Out?

Successful change must involve top management, including the board and chief executive. Usually there’s a champion who initially instigates the change by being visionary, persuasive and consistent. A change agent role is usually responsible to translate the vision to a realistic plan and carry out the plan. Change is usually best carried out as a team-wide effort. Communications about the change should be frequent and with all organization members. To sustain change, the structures of the organization itself should be  modified, including strategic plans, policies and procedures. This change in the structures of the organization typically involves an unfreezing, change and re-freezing process.

The best approaches to address resistances is through increased and sustained communications and education. For example, the leader should meet with all managers and staff to explain reasons for
the change, how it generally will be carried out and where others can go for additional information. A plan should be developed and communicated. Plans do change. That’s fine, but communicate that the plan has changed and why. Forums should be held for organization members to express their ideas for the plan. They should be able to express their concerns and frustrations as well.

Some General Guidelines to Organization-Wide Change

(Note that the library topic Basic Overview of Major Methods and Movements to Improve Organizational Performance includes overviews of major methods and movements associated with organizational change. Readers would best be served to read the following basic guidelines as foundation for carrying
out any of the methods associated with organizational change.)

In addition to the general guidelines listed above, there are a few other basic guidelines to keep in mind.
1. Consider using a consultant. Ensure the consultant is highly experienced in organization-wide change. Ask to see references and check the references.
2. Widely communicate the potential need for change. Communicate what you’re doing about it. Communicate what was done and how it worked out.
3. Get as much feedback as practical from employees, including what they think are the problems and what should be done to resolve them. If possible, work with a team of employees to manage the change.
4. Don’t get wrapped up in doing change for the sake of change. Know why you’re making the change. What goal(s) do you hope to accomplish?
6. Plan the change. How do you plan to reach the goals, what will you need to reach the goals, how long might it take and how will you know when you’ve reached your goals or not? Focus on the coordination of the departments/programs in your organization, not on each part by itself. Have someone in charge of the plan.
7. End up having every employee ultimately reporting to one person, if possible, and they should know who that person is. Job descriptions are often complained about, but they are useful in specifying who reports to whom.
8. Delegate decisions to employees as much as possible. This includes granting them the authority and responsibility to get the job done. As much as possible, let them decide how to do the project.
9. The process won’t be an “aha!” It will take longer than you think.
10. Keep perspective. Keep focused on meeting the needs of your customer or clients.
11. Take care of yourself first. Organization-wide change can be highly stressful.
12. Don’t seek to control change, but rather to expect it, understand it and manage it.
13. Include closure in the plan. Acknowledge and celebrate your accomplishments.
14. Read some resources about organizational change, including new forms and structures.

Additional Perspectives on Organizational Change


For the Category of Management:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Basics in Internal Organizational Communications

Happy Colleagues Communicating While Working Together

Basics in Internal Organizational Communications

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.
Adapted from the Field Guide to Leadership and Supervision in Business
and Field Guide to Leadership and Supervision for Nonprofit Staff.

Most experts on organizational communications, management and leadership, assert that effective communications is the foundation for effectiveness in any type of organization. They assert there can’t be too much  communication. Some leaders misinterpret communications to be the same as paperwork or bureaucracy and so they’re averse to a high degree of communications. As leaders and managers mature, they realize the need to effective convey and receive information, and efforts at communications (internal and external) increase substantially.

Sections of This Topic Include

Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizational Communication

In addition to the articles on this current page, also see the following blogs that have posts related to Organizational Communication. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog. The blog also links to numerous free related resources.

Also consider
Related Library Topics


Purpose of this Document

Texts on organizational communications tend to first examine basics concepts such as “communications”, “sender”, “receivers”, “encoders”, etc. They go on to examine aspects of communications, e.g., downward, upward, body, verbal, written, formal and informal, interpersonal and group, etc. Some texts include various means to analyze effectiveness of communications. Some writers include public relations and media relations in organizational communications.

This document is geared to provide practical suggestions for nonprofit leaders and managers to ensure sufficient communications within their nonprofits and with external stakeholders. Public relations and media relations are outside the range of this document. Communications is one of those topics that tend to leave people feeling somewhat confused or sometimes bored. People get confused because communications is such a broad topic and it seems to somehow relate to everything. People who get bored assume that they’ve been communicating since childhood so why bring up the topic of communications. Consequently, it may be most useful in this document to start with common pitfalls in communications and then provide a range of items that can be used to enhance communications.

Note that many organizations take a deliberate, formal approach to ensuring sound communications, (both internal and external) by developing a communications plan.

Common Causes of Problems in Internal Communications

1. If I know it, then everyone must know it.
Perhaps the most common communications problem is managements’ (leaders’ and managers’) assumption that because they are aware of some piece of information, than everyone else is, too. Usually staff aren’t aware unless management makes a deliberate attempt to carefully convey information.

2. We hate bureaucracy — we’re “lean and mean.”
When organizations are just getting started, their leaders can often prize themselves on not being burdened with what seems as bureaucratic overhead, that is, as extensive written policies and procedures. Writing something down can be seen as a sign of bureaucracy and to be avoided. As the organization grows, it needs more communications and feedback to remain healthy, but this communication isn’t valued. As a result, increasing confusion ensues — unless management matures and realizes the need for increased, reliable communications.

3. I told everyone, or some people, or …?
Another frequent problem is managements’ not really valuing communications or assuming that it just happens. So they’re not aware of what they told to whom — even when they intended for everyone to know the information.

4. Did you hear what I meant for you to hear?
With today’s increasingly diverse workforce, it’s easy to believe you’ve conveyed information to someone, but you aren’t aware that they interpreted you differently than you intended. Unfortunately, you won’t be aware of this problem until a major problem or issue arises out of the confusion.

5. Our problems are too big to have to listen to each other!
Particularly when personnel are tired or under stress, it’s easy to do what’s urgent rather than what’s important. So people misunderstand others’ points or understand their intentions. This problem usually gets discovered too late, too.

6. So what’s to talk about?
Lastly, communications problems can arise when inexperienced management interprets its job to be solving problems and if they’re aren’t any problems/crises, then there’s nothing that needs to be communicated.

7. There’s data and there’s information.
As organizations grow, their management tends to focus on matters of efficiency. They often generate systems that produce substantial amount of data — raw information that doesn’t seem to really be important.

8. If I need your opinion, I’ll tell it to you.
Lastly, communications problems can arise when management simply sees no value whatsoever in communicating with subordinates, believing subordinates should shut up and do their jobs.

Key Principles to Effective Internal Organizational Communications

1. Unless management comprehends and fully supports the premise that organizations must have high degrees of communications (like people needing lots of water), the organization will remain stilted. Too often, management learns the need for communication by having to respond to the lack of it.
2. Effective internal communications start with effective skills in communications, including basic skills in listening, speaking, questioning and sharing feedback. See Communications Skills. These can developed with some concerted review and practice. Perhaps the most important outcome from these skills is conveying that you value hearing from others and their hearing from you.
3. Sound meeting management skills go a long way toward ensuring effective communications, too. See
Guidelines for Effective Meeting Management.
4. A key ingredient to developing effective communications in any organization is each person taking responsibility to assert when they don’t understand a communication or to suggest when and how someone could communicate more effectively.

Basic Structures/Policies to Support Effective Internal Communications

This communication can be looked at as communications downward and upward.

Downward Communications:

1. Ensure every employee receives a copy of the strategic plan, which includes the organization’s mission, vision, values statement, strategic goals and strategies about how those goals will be reached.
2. Ensure every employee receives an employee handbook that contains all up-to-date personnel policies.
3. Develop a basic set of procedures for how routine tasks are conducted and include them in standard operating manual.
4. Ensure every employee has a copy of their job description and the organization chart.
5. Regularly hold management meetings (at least every two weeks), even if there’s nothing pressing to report. If you hold meetings only when you believe there’s something to report, then communications will occur only when you have something to say — communications will be one way and the organization will suffer. Have meetings anyway, if only to establish and affirm the communication that things are of a status that there’s not immediate problems.
6. Hold full staff meetings every month to report how the organization is doing, major accomplishments, concerns, announcements about staff, etc.
7. Leaders and managers should have face-to-face contact with employees at least once a week. Even if the organization is over 20 employees (large for a nonprofit), management should stroll by once in a while.
8. Regularly hold meetings to celebrate major accomplishments. This helps employees perceive what’s important, gives them a sense of direction and fulfillment, and let’s them know that leadership is on top of things.
9. Ensure all employees receive yearly performance reviews, including their goals for the year, updated job descriptions, accomplishments, needs for improvement, and plans to help the employee accomplish the improvements. If the nonprofit has sufficient resources (a realistic concern), develop a career plan with the employee, too.

Upward Communications:

1. Ensure all employees give regular status reports to their supervisors. Include a section for what they did last week, will do next week and any actions/issues to address.
2. Ensure all supervisors meet one-on-one at least once a month with their employees to discuss how its’ going, hear any current concerns from the employee, etc. Even if the meeting is chit-chat, it cultivates an important relationship between supervisor and employee.
3. Use management and staff meetings to solicit feedback. Ask how it’s going. Do a round table approach to hear from each person.
4. Act on feedback from others. Write it down. Get back to it — if only to say you can’t do anything about the reported problem or suggestion, etc.
5. Respect the “grapevine.” It’s probably one of the most prevalent and reliable forms of communications. Major “movements” in the organization usually first appear when employees feel it safe to venture their feelings or opinions to peers.

Supervisor and Employee Communications

Supervision is often considered to include designing the job, hiring someone to fill the job, training them, delegating to them, guiding them via performance reviews, helping them develop their career, noting performance issues, and firing them, if needed. Obviously small nonprofits may not be able to afford full attention to all of these activities.

However, there are several basic and regular activities which provide a solid foundation for effective supervision. These basics ensure that everyone is working together — as important, that staff feel they are working together — towards a common cause.

Ironically, these basics are usually the first activities that stop when an organization is in a crisis. Consequently, an organization development specialist, when “diagnosing” an organization, often first looks to see if these basics are underway. The following activities should be conducted by the new employer’s supervisor.
1. Have all employees provide weekly written status reports to their supervisors.
Include what tasks were done last week, what tasks are planned next week, any pending issues and date the report. These reports may seem a tedious task, but they’re precious in ensuring that employee and their supervisor have mutual understanding of what is going on, and the reports come in very handy for planning purposes. They also make otherwise harried staff and managers stand back and reflect on what they’re doing.

2. Hold monthly meetings with all staff together
– Review the overall condition of the organization and review recent successes. Consider conducting “in service” training where employees take turns describing their roles to the rest of the staff. For clarity, focus and morale, be sure to use agendas and ensure follow-up minutes. Consider bringing in a client to tell their story of how the organization helped them. These meetings go a long way toward building a feeling of teamwork among staff. See Guidelines for Meeting Management.

3. Hold weekly or biweekly meetings with all staff together if the organization is small (e.g., under 10 people); otherwise, with all managers together.
Have these meetings even if there is not a specific problem to solve — just make them shorter. (Holding meetings only when there are problems to solve cultivates a crisis-oriented environment where managers
believe their only job is to solve problems.) Use these meetings for each person to briefly give an overview of what they are doing that week. Facilitate the meetings to support exchange of ideas and questions. Again, for clarity, focus and morale, be sure to use agendas, take minutes and ensure follow-up minutes. Have each person bring their calendar to ensure scheduling of future meetings accommodates each person’s calendar.

4. Have supervisors meet with their direct reports in one-on-one meetings every month –
This ultimately produces more efficient time management and supervision. Review overall status of work activities, hear how it’s going with both the supervisor and the employee, exchange feedback and questions about current programs and services, and discuss career planning, etc. Consider these meetings as interim meetings between the more formal, yearly performance review meetings.

Develop a Basic Communications Plan

Whether planning your internal or external communications efforts, it helps a great deal to develop a communications plan, either informally or formally. For example, consider:
1. What key messages do you want to convey?
2. To what key stakeholders do you want to convey the key messages (e.g., consider clients, funders, community leaders, service providers, etc.)?
3. What’s the best approach to reach each key stakeholder, including who/how should the message be conveyed?
4. How will you know if you’re reaching these stakeholders or not?


For the Category of Marketing:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Organizational Communications (Internal and External)

Business-people-holding-speech-bubbles

Organizational Communications (Internal and External)

Much of the information in this topic is adapted from the books Field Guide to Leadership and Supervision in Business
and Field Guide to Leadership and Supervision for Nonprofit Staff.

Sections of This Topic Include

Organizational Communications Assessment
Internal Communications
External Communications
General Information

Also consider
Communications
(Interpersonal)

Communications
(Writing)

Interpersonal
Skills

Related Library Topics

Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizational Communication

In addition to the articles on this current page, also see the following blogs
that have posts related to Organizational Communication. Scan down the blog’s
page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts”
in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a
post in the blog. The blog also links to numerous free related resources.

Library’s
Leadership Blog

Library’s
Public and Media Relations Blog

Library’s Supervision Blog


Organizational Communications Assessment

Effective Organizational Communication: A Competitive
Advantage

Communications
Assessment

Organizational
Communication Assessment research

Internal Communications

Basics of Internal Organizational Communications
How To Engage Employees With Technology Based
Change

Validate
Parking? Easy. Validating Your Work Life with Good Communications

Key Ingredients for Effective Internal Communications
Employee Communication: Are You Getting the Word Out?
When Times Are Tough What Do You Do?
Communication: Are Your People Getting The Message?

External Communications

Public
and Media relations

General Information

Advanced
Organizational Communication

Organizational Communications Audit
Communication Strategies, Systems, and Skills
Authentic Communication: Dealing with Moose-on-the-Table
Grapevine Communication in the Workplace


For the Category of Communications (Organizational):

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Related Library Topics

Recommended Books


Basic Overview of Organizational Behavior: Guidelines and Resources

Business people looking at a tablet screen

Basic Overview of Organizational Behavior: Guidelines and Resources

Much of the content of this topic came from this book:
Consulting and Organization Development - Book Cover

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Strongly Suggested Pre-Reading

Organizational Performance Management

Sections of This Topic Include

Types of Practices to Influence and Sustain Desired Behaviors in Organizations

Also consider


Description

Be sure to read the description in Organizational Performance Management to understand that organizational behavior and organizational structures are ultimately strategies to help increase the performance of an organization.

In this topic, the Library aims to convey the core practices in guiding organizational behaviors, as well as how the practices might be organized and integrated. You will recognize most of the practices because many of them are commonplace in our lives and work.

Understand that the practices are cyclical and highly integrated in nature. Like any component in a cycle, the learning from implementing the practices should, in turn, improve the other components.

Remember that the nature of how the practices are implemented depends on whether the leaders in the organization choose traditional or progressive approaches to performance management. See
Performance Management: Traditional and Progressive Approaches

The purpose of the information in this topic is to convey the core concepts in organizational behavior. Your proficiency in the concepts would come from applying them over time, especially under the guidance of a person who is highly experienced in applying them, as well.

(Those who naturally prefer to focus on the “human” side of organizations, rather than on the “business” side, might particularly appreciate this topic on organizational behavior.)


What is Organizational Behavior?

Definitions

Organizational behavior focuses on how humans behave in organizations, including how they interact with each other, as well as how they work within the organizations’ structures to get their work done. Here are some other definitions:

  • Organizational behavior is the “the study of human behavior in organizational settings, the interface between human behavior and the organization, and the organization itself.” iEduNote
  • “Organizational behavior is directly concerned with the understanding, prediction, and control of human behavior in organizations.” — Fred Luthans

Goals

This description specifies the goals of organizational behavior:

  • “The goals of OB [organizational behavior] are to explain, predict, and influence behavior. Managers need to be able to explain why employees engage in some behaviors rather than others, predict how employees will respond to various actions and decisions, and influence how employees behave.” — Open Class

However, organizational behavior holds benefits for employees, as well. The field is rich with research, findings, guidelines and tools for employees to clarify their own goals, understand what motivates them and increase their job satisfaction.


Practices to Influence and Sustain Desired Behaviors in Organizations

There is a vast array of different types of practices that leaders and managers use to influence their employees toward achieving the organization’s goals. More recently, they use a variety of practices to help employees to achieve their own goals, as well. Thus, it can be a challenge to efficiently categorize and explain the practices in a manner that is comprehensive and yet well organized.

IEduNote‘s listing of the eight objectives of organizational behavior seems a reasonable way to categorize them, as well. The titles of their objectives have been slightly reordered and modified in the following categories. The categories are cyclical and highly integrated with each other.

NOTE: Descriptions of each of the following practices are included in each of their respective topics in this Free Management Library. Thus, the descriptions are not duplicated here.

Cultivating the Right Organizational Culture

Organizational culture can be explained as a combination of the members’ values, beliefs, assumptions and ways that they interact with each other. Basically, an organization’s culture is its personality. A person’s personality influences every aspect of their life.

The same is true of an organization’s culture. That is why experts on strategic planning often assert that “culture eats strategy for breakfast” — that is, culture often determines whether strategies are successful or not. That is why so much of what happens in an organization starts from its culture, especially the behaviors that occur in it. The following topics refer to practices that might influence an organization’s culture, and thus the overall behaviors in it.

Applying the Right Leadership

The culture of the organization, its current life cycle and the nature of its strategic goals all help to suggest the types of leadership needed in an organization.

For example, a start-up organization might want leaders who are visionary and charismatic in attracting more employees to join it. It might also want leaders who have strong expertise in the types of products and services that it delivers. However, as the organization evolves, it might want leaders with expertise in developing internal systems and practices to form a firm foundation for further growth.

A complicating factor about leadership is that different leadership skills are required for leading oneself versus leading another individual versus leading a group versus leading an organization. See Understanding All Aspects of Leadership.

If the organization’s culture is quite traditional, then it might prefer a rather autocratic style of leadership; whereas, a more progressive organization might prefer a more participatory style.

Also, it is important to remember that leaders cannot successfully lead others unless they first can successfully lead themselves.

Understanding How to Develop Great Leaders

The leaders in an organization are the “engines” that drive the activities in organizational performance. Thus, the expertise of the leaders is a critical component in the success of the organization itself. As discussed above, the nature of the leaders must match the models and styles preferred by the organization. That often requires further development of the leaders, including its executives, managers and supervisors.

Finding the Right People

The most important asset in an organization is its people. As important as having the right kind of leaders and managers is having the right kind of employees — employees who can do a great job in doing the necessary work to best achieve the goals of the organization. This is where expertise in human resource management is vital to the success of the organization. However, small- to medium-sized organizations can still do that 20% of effort that generates 80% of the success in finding and equipping the right people.

Understanding Nature and Needs of Employees

Historical approaches to management treated employees like machines. The top priority was on efficiency — on producing more results in less time. However, today’s approaches have changed dramatically. Today’s leaders are realizing that they will get better performance if they treat their employees as individuals, each of whom is unique in their own interests and capabilities — and also in what motivates them. For the new generations in today’s workforce, it is often far more important to find meaning and fulfillment in their work than to make more money.

Sustaining Strong Job Satisfaction

Research shows that the cost of hiring and re-training employees is one of the highest of labor costs in organizations. Research also shows a strong correlation between job satisfaction and employee retention. Fortunately, there are a variety of approaches to support strong job satisfaction for employees.

Developing High-Performing Teams

Most of the significant accomplishments in organizations is done in teams. However, a team is often comprised of a wide diversity of values, perspectives and opinions among its members. So teams must be carefully planned, organized and supported. Also, a team is an organization — just a small one. Thus, team performance management is also critical to the success of a team.

Maintaining Strong Performance

Strong performance is the result of very effectively and efficiently achieving the goals, whether they are for an employee, team or the overall organization. Performance management means establishing the goals, monitoring their achievement and making the necessary corrections in order to achieve them even better.

Suggested Additional Readings


Learn More in the Library’s Blogs Related to Organizational Performance

In addition to the articles on this current page, also see the following blogs that have posts related to organizations. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “next” near the bottom of a post in the blog. The blog also links to numerous free related resources.


For the Category of Organizational Development:

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.


Overview of Nonprofit Fundraising Sources and Approaches

Business people looking a document discussing

Overview of Nonprofit
Fundraising Sources and Approaches

© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Sections in This Topic Include the Following

Basic Guidelines for Fundraising
Typical Funding Sources and Advantages-Disadvantages
of Each

Information for Smaller Nonprofits

Also consider
Related Library Topics


General Guidelines
for Fundraising

In addition to the guidelines included in the large amount of
other fundraising information referenced from the library:
· Ensure the board is strongly involved in fundraising
planning and implementation
· Develop fundraising goals to be the resources needed
to reach the strategic goals identified during strategic planning
· Identify a variety of funding sources for each goal and
the particular fundraising strategies preferred by each of the
sources (the above-mentioned Web page provides a good overview
of various strategies and where they should be used)
· Ensure your plans specify who will be doing what fundraising,
so you don’t have sources who become overwhelmed or irritated
by repeated solicitations from different people in your organization

“The Complete Guide to Nonprofit Management” by Smith,
Bucklin and Associates suggests:
· The most important aspect of fundraising is excellent
public relations, that is, ensuring that your community has a
strong, positive impression of your organization
· Establish an organizational structure to implement the
fundraising plan, including:

    Board Executive Committee – Establishes priorities
    and goals and approves the plan

    Outreach/Marketing Committee – Identifies potential
    donors and coordinates efforts to promote fundraising

    Fundraising Committee – Leads development and implementation
    of the plan, and approaches donors

    Volunteer Coordinator – Coordinates volunteer efforts,
    including identifying where volunteers might help, recruiting
    volunteers, ensuring they are effective and that they are recognized

    Information processing – Assign staff to develop and
    maintain the fundraising database

    Accounting – Be sure to include moneys raised in your
    accounting system

    Donation processing – Have staff available to process
    donations (cashing checks, sending notes of appreciation, updating
    the fundraising database, etc.)

· Most fundraising is done in the fall of the year when
corporations are doing their planning for the following year
· Corporations typically require a written proposal
· Foundations rarely fund operating costs, that is, costs
to support central administration of an organization, rather than
specific programs which directly deliver services
· Consider approaching a local advertising, marketing or
public relations firm for pro bono advice. Regularly send these
companies evidence of the successes of your organization to keep
them up to date on your organization.
· Consider using third-class mailing, which is cheaper
than first-class, but sometimes takes as much as two weeks longer
to arrive. Expedite arrival of third-class mail by using bar codes
and nine-digit zip codes.



Typical Funding Sources and Advantages/Disadvantages of Each
(Credit to Ellen M. Hatfield of the Twin Cities in Minnesota)

Source

Advantages

Disadvantages

Individuals · Largest source of giving
· Ongoing source one can build
· Once a giver, also an advocate
· Volunteers are a good source of money
· Costly to develop, small return
per individual unit
· Hard to generate unless broad-based direct service appeal

· Risky for the inexperienced
· Need significant assistance from the organization’s
board and volunteers

Large-Family Foundations · Source of large sums of money

· Accessible, professional staff
· Clear guidelines, process
· Most likely to research your request
· Board volunteers can help, not always key

· Start-up funds only
· Lengthy process
· More difficult to access through personal influence

· Proposals may be more lengthy

Community Foundations · Much like large-family
foundations
· Staff may be sufficient
· Host of foundations within
foundations
· Most money is earmarked, special funds
Small-Family Foundations · May fund ongoing operating
expenses
· Personal influence with board members helps
· Guidelines often broad
· Not very fussy about grant format
· Hard to access, no professional
staff
· Often not large sums of money
· Without personal influence, may not be possible
Large Corporations / Corporate
Foundations
· Can be source of large
sums of money
· Smaller amounts of money may be ongoing
· Often accessible, professional staff
· May be tied to volunteer involvement
· Business strategy may be clear
· Source of cause-related marketing
· Large sums of money aren’t
ongoing
· Hard to get around staff
· Must be within their guidelines
· Not likely to contribute if not headquartered locally
or have a public consumer base
· Often want board representation
Small Corporations · Very informal approach
· Money may be ongoing
· Personal connections will suffice
· Neighborhood focus will help
· Small amounts of money
· Narrow range of interest
· Personal contacts are key
Federated Funds (United Ways,
United Arts, Combined Health Appeal)
· Steady source of relatively
large sums of money
· Clear process
· Professional staff, can be agency staff driven
· Generally can’t be a start-up
organization
· Must be social service and fit priority focus
· Very lengthy entry process
· Very time consuming as must be part of yearly fund raising
process, with periodic in-depth review
Government · Large sums of money possible

· Process is set, clear
· Political clout helps
· May be source of ongoing money

· Application procedures
may be long, tedious
· May only pay by unit of service, fluctuates
· Unspent monies may be returned
· Difficult record keeping
Churches and Organizations · Often looking for group
projects
· In-kind services most likely

· Need to fit their service focus, neighborhood or religious
outlook

Information
for Smaller Nonprofits

For smaller nonprofits (e.g., with budgets under $100,000 or so),
Smith, Bucklin and Associates (in “The Complete Guide to
Nonprofit Management”) recommend:
· Start with internal solicitations to board members, staff
and members of your organization (if you are chartered on a membership
basis).
· Look to the donors who can make the largest contributions.
Write them, call them and arrange a visit. Offer a co-sponsorship
to events.
· Next, prepare a detailed donor list and offer them a
range of options.
· Then go to the smaller donations list.


For the Category of Fundraising (Nonprofit):

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.

Related Library Topics

Recommended Books


All About Nonprofit Fundraising – Guidelines and Resources

Fundraising on a notebook

All About Nonprofit Fundraising – Guidelines and Resources

This topic in the Library will help nonprofit leaders and staff learn to understand the various/varied elements of fundraising, to recognize the importance of the relationship between an organization
and its potential donors, and to construct and implement a strong fundraising plan/program for their nonprofits. In addition, much of the subject matter in this topic will help nonprofit leaders and staff recognize what it is that they don’t know about fundraising, and how to remedy that situation.

Be sure to also see the following blogs and the many posts published in the blogs:
Library’s Fundraising Blog and Nonprofits.

Sections of This Topic Include

Additional Resources

Also consider
Related Library Topics


Fundraising Basics – Sources and Responsibilities

Typical Funding Sources and Advantages and Disadvantages of Each

(Credit to Ellen M. Hatfield of the Twin Cities in Minnesota)

Source

Advantages

Disadvantages

Individuals · Largest source of giving
· Ongoing source one can build
· Once a giver, also an advocate
· Volunteers are a good source of money
· Costly to develop, small return per individual unit
· Hard to generate unless broad-based direct service appeal· Risky for the inexperienced
· Need significant assistance from the organization’s board and volunteers
Large-Family Foundations · Source of large sums of money

· Accessible, professional staff
· Clear guidelines, process
· Most likely to research your request
· Board volunteers can help, not always key

· Start-up funds only
· Lengthy process
· More difficult to access through personal influence· Proposals may be more lengthy
Community Foundations · Much like large-family foundations
· Staff may be sufficient
· Host of foundations within foundations
· Most money is earmarked, special funds
Small-Family Foundations · May fund ongoing operating expenses
· Personal influence with board members helps
· Guidelines often broad
· Not very fussy about grant format
· Hard to access, no professional
staff
· Often not large sums of money
· Without personal influence, may not be possible
Large Corporations / Corporate
Foundations
· Can be source of large sums of money
· Smaller amounts of money may be ongoing
· Often accessible, professional staff
· May be tied to volunteer involvement
· Business strategy may be clear
· Source of cause-related marketing
· Large sums of money aren’t ongoing
· Hard to get around staff
· Must be within their guidelines
· Not likely to contribute if not headquartered locally or have a public consumer base
· Often want board representation
Small Corporations · Very informal approach
· Money may be ongoing
· Personal connections will suffice
· Neighborhood focus will help
· Small amounts of money
· Narrow range of interest
· Personal contacts are key
Federated Funds (United Ways,
United Arts, Combined Health Appeal)
· Steady source of relatively large sums of money
· Clear process
· Professional staff, can be agency staff driven
· Generally can’t be a start-up
organization
· Must be social service and fit priority focus
· Very lengthy entry process
· Very time consuming as must be part of yearly fund raising process, with periodic in-depth review
Government · Large sums of money possible

· Process is set, clear
· Political clout helps
· May be source of ongoing money

· Application procedures may be long, tedious
· May only pay by unit of service, fluctuates
· Unspent monies may be returned
· Difficult record keeping
Churches and Organizations · Often looking for group projects · In-kind services most likely

· Need to fit their service focus, neighborhood or religious outlook

Who is Responsible for Fundraising in a Nonprofit?

by Hank Lewis

A Reader Wrote: “I have been looking around your web site/blog trying to find information about the role of employees in fundraising for an NPO. I see some information about the role of board members and volunteers, but I seem unable to find anything specific about employees….”.

It’s a “given” in the fundraising world that: “Everyone at a nonprofit has an impact on the organization’s ability to raise money” … even though not everyone is involved in “Asking.”

Although someone else might have the title, the CEO is also the chief development officer. S/he is the chief advocate for the organization and its mission, and should be the most knowledgeable person about how the NPO is pursuing that mission. S/he is the public face of the NPO, with the most credibility.

The CEO is (and should often be) involved in many of the major solicitations, either alone or with someone who is better suited to do the “Ask.”

Board Members, ideally, should all give to the best of their ability and should be involved in the process of identifying, cultivating and soliciting (other) major donors — but, they aren’t always wealthy, and they
don’t always have wealthy friends.

I refer to “Volunteer Leaders” as the people most involved with the identification, cultivation, evaluation and solicitation of major donors. They don’t have to be board members, but they must be committed
to raising (or helping raise) the needed funds.

Staff members fall into three categories: (1) Those who actually work at advancing and supporting the NPO’s development/fundraising efforts; (2) Administrative and support staff; and, (3) The program staffers who design and deliver the NPO’s services.

In the context of this posting, nothing needs be said about group #1.

The group #2 people have occasional contact with (prospective) donors, and how they treat those folks creates an impression that can/will impact the likelihood of giving.

The folks in group #3 have the most experience with advancing the mission. They design and implement the NPO’s programs, and they know the people being served. They are the best people to be describing how the donor’s money has or will impact people’s lives.

These folks don’t have to be involved in “Asking,” but they should be involved in the process of cultivating/educating prospective and current donors … ‘cause nobody can tell the story the way they can.

One more thought: Everybody should pass on to the development staff any (non-confidential) information they have that might help identify, cultivate, evaluate or solicit (potential) donors.

I hope I answered the reader’s question. If not, let me know.

Fundraising for New Nonprofits

by Hank Lewis

An email asked: “What advice is there for new nonprofits without a funding history? So many groups with a lot of potential just don’t know where to begin.”

The biggest mistake most new NPOs make is the assumption/belief that, because they want to do wonderful things, everyone (read: gov’t, corporations, foundations and “rich people”) will want to give them money.

The fact is that an NPO must prove itself — prove it can do what it says it can, prove it can be fiscally responsible, prove it is actually needed — before gov’t, corps and fndns will be willing to invest in it.

Of course (he says with tongue-in-cheek), that leaves rich people, and all new NPOs think that Bill Gates is going to send them a check — all they’ll have to do is write him a letter, then watch the mail.

Hey, don’t hold your breath on that one.

A major factor for getting money from rich people is having access to those people. If you have personal relationships with the wealthy, then it’ll be easy for you to pick up the phone and make an appointment to go see your “friend” and ask for that big check. The same if you know someone who has those connections and can/will do that for you.

Failing all that, it comes down to the hard realization that, if you don’t know someone with an “in,” you must rely on the tried and true methods for obtaining that initial funding.

If you can’t rely on outsiders (the gov’t, corps, fndns and the wealthy), it’s up to the insiders to make it happen.

For each new non-profit, the specifics may be different, but the general circumstances are pretty much the same. There must be an understanding that if the people who created the new organization can’t/won’t give of their own resources (to the extent they can) then why would anyone else want to … why should anyone else?

Once that is understood, the founders of that new NPO must take an inventory — who of the people that they know might come to care (as much as you do) about the reasons why the NPO was created … and eventually want to support that organization.

There must also be an evaluation of how those founders and the people with whom they have relationships can begin to make a difference. This step is often best accomplished with some expert guidance.

Many new NPOs bring in someone to speak with their leadership, to educate them as to the processes and procedures that are, typically, most effective, and to help them determine what might be most effective for them. Founders of many new NPOs also attend seminars/workshops designed to educate new NPO leaders.

Bottom line for a new NPO is — to paraphrase, “Only when you’ve helped yourself will others be willing to help you.” PROVE you’re worthy, and future funding will be a lot more likely.

Numerous Additional Resources About Basics of Fundraising


Fundraising Laws and Ethics

Laws

Ethics

Also consider
Business Ethics


Fundraising Leadership: Committees, Board and Other Volunteers

Role of the Nonprofit Board Fundraising Committee

One of the biggest misconceptions about the Fundraising Committee is that its members are to do the fundraising for the nonprofit. No, the job of the Fundraising Committee is to ensure that the fundraising is done very well. The actual fundraising should be done by all Board members, with various staff members supporting those Board members.

What’s the Primary Role of Any Board Committee?

The role of any Board Committee is, at a minimum, to ensure “best practices” in the activities, or the function, that the committee is assigned to. Just like people need to do certain things to stay healthy (such as eat, sleep and exercise), organizations need to do certain activities, too. Many people might refer to those activities as “best practices.” (There are many strong feelings about whether “best practices” even exist, but most people would assert that the phrase has more usefulness than not.)

When recurring crises occur, it’s usually because people are attending only to what’s urgent and not to what’s important. Best practices ensure that the most important activities are done. So Board committees should ensure “best practices” are implemented in the major functions in an organization, for example, in Board operations, planning, marketing, staffing, finances and (in the case of nonprofits) fundraising.

What’s the Primary Role of a Fundraising Committee? What Are Its Ongoing Responsibilities?

Notice the nature of the following activities — how they are not focused on very near-term, detailed tasks for Committee members to raise money. The following responsibilities should be included on a work plan for a Fundraising Committee. Notice that the activities are recurring — they should be done on an ongoing basis.

1. Ensure there’s a specific fundraising target

How much money needs to be raised? Usually the amount is the difference between expected revenues and expenses. Usually those revenues and expenses are identified during strategic or program planning.

2. Ensure prospect research occurs to identify how much money might be raised from different types of resources

Good prospect research will look at the nature of the nonprofit’s services and its locale, and identify similar nonprofits and the sources of funding used by them. For example, similar nonprofits might have raised 50% of funds from individuals, 20% from government contracts, 20% from grants and 10% from fees. That profile suggests the mix that the nonprofit might aim for. Good prospect research will go beyond searching a database of foundations to submit proposals to.

3. identify specific, potential sources of funds from a diverse mix of sources

Now the nonprofit is ready to start selecting specific sources of funds from individuals, foundations, government and/or fees. These activities should result in the names of specific sources, for example, names of people, foundations and government agencies, and/or the specific amounts of fees to charge for certain services. (The amounts of fees to charge might be recommended by, for example, a Marketing Committee.)

4. Develop an action plan about who is going to approach what source, how and by when

This responsibility includes identifying which Board members will approach what source, along with what staff members will support those Board members. All Board members should have assignments, not just the members of the Fundraising Committee.

5. Compile the results of items 1, 2, 3 and 4 into a Fundraising Plan that is approved by the Board

The Plan should include more than merely a listing of what foundations to approach. The Plan becomes the roadmap for generating sufficient revenue. It should include realistic expectations from a diversity of sources, and justify how those sources were identified. It should include an action plan (from step 4) that the Fundraising Committee ensures is implemented on a timely basis.

6. Ensure effective administrative systems to track grants and donations

As funding comes into the nonprofit, its various sources and amounts must be closely and accurately documented. Acknowledgements and receipts must be provided back to donors. Grant requirements must be monitored to ensure they are met. In the United States, fundraising information must be included on the IRS Form 990.

Summary — Job of the Fundraising Committee is to Ensure Planful, Strategic Fundraising

So, again, notice that the job of the Committee is NOT to just ask the Executive Director to provide a list of foundations to write grants to. It’s much more strategic than that. And its responsibilities are recurring — Committee members should never say they don’t have anything to do. Members of the Fundraising
Committee should not be picked because they are “big names” or “big pockets.” Popular and rich people rarely want to serve on Fundraising Committees. Many times, they’d rather write a check, than be expected to attend monthly meetings. And foundation officers see right through the “game” of listing big names on a list of Board members. Instead, select members who know how to think strategically, develop a plan and ensure that the plan is implemented.

Numerous Additional Resources About Basics of Fundraising Leadership

Also consider


Development Staff: Director of Development and Other Staff

Does Your Organization Need a Director of Development?

by Hank Lewis

I initially wrote this piece with the idea in mind that many NPOs don’t need DODs, but my wife read it and said I was totally wrong. So, the following is sort of a collaboration … actually, I won’t publish anything she doesn’t approve !!

Ideally, from day one, an organization should have someone who knows/understands the NPO, its mission, its leadership and its hopes and aspirations. This person should have the experience and skills to help the NPO plan for next week and next year.

This person should have input at all levels, should be able to guide/train the board members and the CEO, and should be able to bring to staff an awareness and understanding of how they affect the development process.

A large organization, with a large development staff, must have someone to coordinate the various programs and be sure that they support, not conflict with or duplicate each other. Sadly, the vast majority of new/nascent NPOs don’t have the money to hire a person with the requisite experience and capabilities.

Smaller organizations that live on grants, need a grants officer. If much of a NPO’s income is from events, then an event coordinator is needed. If one person can do both, all the better.

To hire a staff person to focus on one or two activities, and give that person the title of Director of Development, is to lie to that person, to that person’s next employer and to the board and staff of the NPO doing the hiring.

Hiring a person and giving them the title doesn’t mean that you’re actually getting all the experience/expertise that comes with a real director of development.

A DOD is a critical hire for an organization. The right person can greatly help ensure an organization’s future….

Numerous Additional Resources About Development Staff

Also consider


Fundraising Method: Direct Appeals

Direct Mail Donor Retention

by Jonathan Howard

You know that the key to net gains and year-to-year growth of your direct mail fundraising lies with your donor retention rate. Helping first time donors become loyal friends can generate as much as an 80 percent return on investment.

That’s a pretty great business model. But few nonprofits get it right. Here are some key reasons why American philanthropy’s donor retention stinks.

Stingy thank-yous. I just sent you money to change kids lives or save the world. Now I want swift assurance that my money is making that important difference. Instead, I get a form letter back, focused on the tax-deductibility of my gift from some mid-level employee in the development office. Often these aren’t even personally signed.

Awkward introductions. I’ve just taken one step into your world. Are you going let me know you’re happy to see me, bring me up to speed on your work and dreams and introduce me to other people I’d find interesting? That’s the job of the friendly welcome package that donors … the “package” they should get within two weeks of their gift. But generally don’t.

News I can’t use. My donation is not a license to bore me with “news” about your meetings and big shots, or just as bad, to give me no news at all. I want to know how you help me be more like the person I want to be: compassionate, effective, wise. Donor communications should be all about the donor, not the
organization. The word “you” should appear in every item.

Ineffective asks. Some nonprofits fail at mail because they don’t ask for repeat contributions soon enough or often enough. Others fail because they treat donors like automatic teller machines. Both groups fail because they don’t offer donors good reasons to give again. It’s not “mail” that donors dislike – it’s the lack of sincere respect and regard for them that turns donors off.

The answer isn’t turning off the mail. The answer is using mail to build an honest relationship of head and heart with your recent donors.

Numerous Additional Resources About Direct Appeals


Fundraising Method: Grants — Foundation and Corporate



(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Is Your Organization Ready to Start a Grants Program … or Even Submit your First Proposal? (Part 1 of 2)

By Lynn deLearie

In my (May 12, 2011) post, Grantsmanship: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, I quoted from a 2010 WealthEngine white paper stating that the average cost-per-dollar-raised for grants is 20 cents … an ROI of 500%. With such an impressive return on investment, starting a grants program at your NPO might seem like a great idea…

But, as Hank Lewis wrote in his (May 14, 2010) post, Grants: Free Money – Not Quite !! ,“Grants come with a variety of obligations. Corporations, foundations and government agencies don’t just give it away.
It takes more than mailing applications and waiting for the checks to arrive.”

So, what do you need to consider before starting a grants program?

I advise (potential) clients to consider the following four points before launching a grants program at their NPO:

Financial Readiness Hank wrote in his post, “The vast majority of grantors want to see your audited financial reports and your budgets. They want to know where the rest of your funding is from, and you will need to prove that you are fiscally responsible, can be trusted and that you operate in a business-like manner.”

In my experience, all of this is true. You will need to provide detailed financial information with most of your foundation grant applications. The exceptions may be with family foundations that don’t always require this level of detail.

A good example of what will be required can be found in the Missouri Common Grant Application, downloadable here.

The application requires the following financial attachments:

Internally prepared income statement for current fiscal year

AND A complete copy of organization’s audited/reviewed/compiled financial statements for the last fiscal year which includes two (2) years of financial information

OR An organization’s most recently filed Form 990 plus internally prepared financial statements for the past two (2) years.

Along with these organizational financial records, you will also need to provide a project budget, your long-term funding plan for the project, and often a budget justification. The Missouri Common Grant Application and Budget Templates provide good information on what will be required.

See Is Your Organization Ready to Start a Grants Program … or Even Submit your First Proposal? (Part 2).

Numerous Additional Resources About Grants: Foundations and Corporate


Grants Management

Grants management is about using the grant as the grantor intended, and reporting to the grantor on a periodic basis. The guidelines and procedures for managing specific grants depend very much on the terms of the grantor. The following links give you some idea of what’s generally involved in managing grants.

Designing Evaluation Methodologies to Include in Your Grants

Funders expect nonprofits to say how they will spend the funder’s money and do so in an effective fashion — and be able to prove that they spent the money in an effective fashion. Usually that proof requires an evaluation. Thus, funders often want nonprofits to include in their grant requests, descriptions of how they will evaluate the project being funded by the grants. The reader would benefit from reading:
Basic Guide to Program Evaluation


Fundraising Method: Grants — Government (Public Grants)

Introduction To Government Grants

By Jayme Sokolow

Every year, government agencies around the country provide over $200 billion in grants … for specific services to local communities. Today, there are approximately 2,000 federal grant programs and over 40,000 state grant programs.

But before you get all excited about all that government money, you must really understand what government grants are and who is eligible to apply for them.

What Is A Government Grant ??

A (federal, state, local) government grant is the money awarded to a nonprofit organization (NPO) consistent with a contract between the government and the NPO – where the latter provides the service for which the former pays. (Grants, of course, do not have to be repaid.)

There is an application process for all government grants, and not all applicants qualify. Then, when you receive a grant, you are agreeing to carry out the activities described in your grant application and to adhere to all the conditions of the award. All such grants include various conditions, one of which is always that the grantee must provide periodic financial and program reports on their “contractual”
activities. There Are Two Kinds of Federal Grants.

For a Direct Grant a you apply directly to federal agency … and there is great competition for these, as you (often) compete with many other nonprofits for funding.

With a Pass-Through Grant, a state government receives federal grant money and then passes on these funds to local nonprofit organizations. There may not be a lot of competition for these, and they are likely to be smaller dollar amounts than direct grants.

Examples of Federal and State Government Grants:

• US Department of Education: grants to help prepare underserved students to graduate high school and attend college.

• US Department of Health and Human Services: grants to provide comprehensive sickle cell disease education, outreach, and medical services.

• North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources: grants to municipalities to prepare for natural disasters such as floods or hurricanes.

Who Is Eligible to Receive Federal and State Grants:

Typically, most grantees fall into the following categories:
• Government organizations: State and Local Governments, Native American Tribal Governments.
• Educational organizations: school districts, private schools, institutions of higher education.
• Public housing organizations: public housing authorities, Indian housing authorities.
• Nonprofit organizations: nonprofit organizations having 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other kinds of NPOs. 392

To get an idea of the volume of federal grants, visit The Catalog of Federal and Domestic Assistance (www.cfda.gov), which lists every grant program administered by the federal government. For grant opportunities at the state level, visit your state government’s Internet site.

Numerous Additional Resources About Grants: Foundations and Corporate

Also consider


(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


Fundraising Method: Special Events

Special Events: Cost Per Dollar Raised

By Natalie Lewis

A recent email asked: “Do you have an article or statement on what is the standard “special event fundraising equation” used to determine financial success? Obviously, one would set a goal, and if that goal is set, you have been successful. Raising awareness and “making friends” is priceless. But, is there a basic non-profit formula goal such as ‘for every dollar spent to organize, coordinate, market, and produce the event, you would hope to raise two dollars?’”

Sadly, there is no “Special Event Fundraising Equation.”

The cost per dollar raised, or return on investment, is dependent on a number of factors. Since those factors have been addressed in prior postings*, I’ll keep it simple. (See: Special Events)

The first time, or even the first couple of times an organization runs an event, they’d be lucky to break even. Only after an NPO’s community/constituency is familiar with the event can there be any assurance that there will be a sufficient number of people interested in the event and willing to attend.

Over the years, as the event becomes a “tradition.” and the organization knows what works and what doesn’t, do the costs and income become predictable.

As the event “matures,” the gap between costs and “profit” increases. A fully mature event can generate two, three, even four times its cost … but that does not happen overnight.

As to setting a goal for an event, you can only do that after you’ve had a number of years of experience with that event. Setting a goal in the first couple of years would be an exercise in wishful thinking or in self-delusion. And remember, you only set a goal when you KNOW you can reach it. Failure to attain a fundraising goal sends a wrong message to your current and future donors.

Numerous Additional Resources About Special Events

Also consider


Fundraising Method: Annual Funds

The Annual Fund Is Obsolete

By Hank Lewis

After thirty years in the non-profit sector, I often find myself questioning, not what we do, but how we label what we do — and how those labels often limit us. The best example of that concept, I believe, is the label “Annual Fund.”

It seems as if, for as long as there have been formal development programs, there have been “Annual Funds.” Each year, goals are set, development staff gears up for another year of activity, constituents get letters and/or phone calls asking for a gift, development staff worries about making/exceeding their goals and they look forward to the end of the fiscal year, when they can put it all to bed and take a deep breath….

While going through this process, however, we are sending the wrong message, not only to our constituents, but also to ourselves. The message is that we should only ask for one gift per donor per year, and that the donor should only give once each year !

Somehow that seems contrary to what fundraising is all about.

By focusing on the (single) annual gift, we and our constituents lose sight of why the giving is important — what and who it supports. People become focused on the process, not on the reason for the process.

Let’s name the process (of raising money on a fiscal year basis) in honor of a founding member of our organization, after the organization itself, or what the funds support, but no more “Annual Fund.”

Let’s not allow what we call an activity to limit what we can accomplish via that activity. And let’s not stifle the creativity that takes us beyond mere process.

Additional Resources About Annual Funds


Fundraising Method: Major Gifts and Planned Giving

What is a Major Gift ??

By Hank Lewis

Many Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) use the term “Major Gifts” to refer to those that are larger than the usual range of gifts that arrive in the mail. Typically, $1,000 is the magic number.

But, unless an organization’s budget and/or the amount to be raised via the fundraising process is unusually small, gifts of $1,000 won’t significantly aid in pursuing financial goals.

A Major Gift, which could be a planned gift, is not based upon exceeding a specific dollar figure — as above, but requires:

1• Amounts that will significantly help to attain fundraising goals — 1% or more of the goal would be significant. If your goal is $1,000,000, at $1,000 each, you’d need 1,000 gifts; and, unless you have the prospect base with that many donors who have given at that level in the past, that’s not very likely. Realistically, for a goal of that size, gifts of $10,000 and up are necessary. (We will address the concept,
construction and use of a Gift Table in a subsequent posting.

2• That prospects be cultivated and solicited on a face-to-face basis. Consistent with the concept/practice of “development,” in order to get donors to want to make “major” gifts, there must be a relationship between the donor and the person doing the asking. And that person must also be one of the people, in not the person, doing the cultivating and educating of the prospective donor.

3• Ask amounts that are well thought out and well researched. When asking for ANY gift to a non-profit, it should always be for a specific dollar figure. For a major gift, it should be a figure based on the donor’s ability to give … and you should always be able to give the donor a good reason “why that amount” !! (For discussion in a future posting.)

4• The development and implementation of an individual plan, or strategy for getting each potential donor to the point where s/he is ready to make the gift you want him/her to make.

Numerous Additional Resources About Major Gifts and Planned Giving


Fundraising Method: Capital Campaign and Endowment Fundraising

Capital Campaigns – Part #1 of 14: What They Are

By Hank Lewis

This series of postings (don’t know yet how many will be in the series) is to help you understand and prepare for a capital campaign, so that, when you hire a staff campaign director or engage counsel, their time (and your money) will be used most effectively.

To start, a definition: A Capital Campaign is an intense effort to acquire sufficient commitments to add up to a specific large sum, for a specific valid/urgent purpose.

The word “Capital” refers to the money needed to erect/expand/renovate a building; it includes funding needed for the purchase/installation/overhaul of (major) equipment; and, has come to include funding to create/expand an endowment. (Endowment campaigns will be addressed in greater depth in a future posting.)

The term “campaign” has it’s origin in a military context — although it’s rarely used that way today. It referred to the actual period of time that the troops were in the field, engaged with the enemy. It was/is a period of action/activity that, ideally, had been planned very carefully. In this context, it is the period of time in which most of the needed dollars are solicited/pledged.

The “intensity” of the effort refers to having board members, staff and other volunteers commit the (additional) time and energy necessary to achieve the dollar goal in a specific (relatively short) timeframe. The typical campaign was designed to take 12 months – but it’s gotten a lot shorter. (More on that, later.)

Typically, a capital campaign solicits pledges – significant dollar commitments to be paid over an extended period. Fifteen/twenty years ago, the period was five years, but considering the societal changes and people’s reluctance to commit to that long an obligation, three years is now typical.

The “specific sum,” the goal of a campaign, is an amount that will allow the organization to pay for the (building/equipment) “project” that is outside its normal/ongoing budget requirements. This cannot be an arbitrarily chosen dollar figure voted on by a board or committee; it must be one that has been determined through a very careful/detailed process.

“Valid” means that it the nonprofit organization was asked to justify why the project was needed, the NPO could clearly explain/demonstrate that a real need exists in the community and that the project would address that need.

“Urgent” excludes any project for which the NPO could accumulate the funding over an extended period of time without the need for a special fundraising effort. It would also exclude any project for which there is not a demonstrable need for the service(s) that will be made available because of the project.

Numerous Additional Resources About Capital Campaigns


Fundraising Online Using the Internet/Web

Mobile Fundraising: Practical Advice

By Rick Christ

After some $40 million was raised in $10 gifts through cell phones for the Haiti earthquake response in January, 2010, every nonprofit had dreams of cell phones as mobile donation machines. Even for the Red Cross, those dreams seem to have evaporated.

However, mobile use among Americans has increased dramatically. It’s probably true that among the most passionate, most connected, most generous and successful Americans, smartphone use is even more ubiquitous. What are the implications for nonprofits, most of whom haven’t mastered the internet
yet? Here are some thoughts gathered at the Direct Marketing Association’s recent Mobile Marketing Day:

  • Text-to-give is NOT a significant part of fundraising.
  • Most smartphone users view much of their email on their phones, so make sure your email messages will render nicely on Apple and Android devices.
  • Every page on your website should be optimized for mobile browsers; otherwise, if donors click once and get garbage, they’re not likely to click again from their cell phones.
  • Mobile is ideal for getting special event attendees to connect with you in a way that will let you continue the conversation after the event.
  • QR codes let mobile users connect with you after seeing something in print, either at an event, in a publication, or on outdoor or transit media, even your direct mail letter.
  • Ask for mobile numbers (but don’t require it) on your donation form and newsletter signup form. If you can associate numbers with donors, you can track the impact of mobile communications, and you can reach out to donors via phone when their mail and email start bouncing.
  • Mobile users can give via their credit cards on a mobile-optimized donation form. Those gifts tend to be as much as 30% smaller than web page gifts sent from a laptop or desktop computer (but that means they’re 70% larger than the gift you wouldn’t get without such a page)
  • One organization indicated that up to ten percent of cell phone area codes do not match up with the supporter’s zip code, meaning that many people keep their old cell number even when they move.
  • If you believe in the future of mobile communications, get your own short code — the 5-digit numbers to which you can send a text message instead of having to enter a full 10-digit phone number. Don’t settle for a shared short code.
  • Apps are expensive and generally not productive unless you have killer content (think National Geographic).

Since the future of mobile is growing, it pays to recognize its potential for your organization, choose one area where you think mobile can be effective for your organization and get started. Your learning curve can match up with the growth of this channel.

Numerous Additional Resources About Fundraising Online

This topics has exploded! It would be extremely difficult to list most of the articles and sites in regard to this topic. Thanks to Jayne Cravens for suggesting many of the following sites!)

Also consider

Using Email and Social Media in Fundraising

Also consider
Social Networking

Fundraising Resources On the Net

Online Donation Services, eg, Credit Card services and Matching Programs

Online Shopping Malls that Donate to Nonprofits

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

General Resources About Online Fundraising


Fundraising Software

Donor Communications and Recognition

A Variety of Thoughts on Donor Recognition

By Hank Lewis

There are many different types of recognition programs, the most effective of which are often the face-to-face variety. Sometimes, the best form of recognition is a handshake offered by the appropriate person.

Another form of recognition that can touch a donor is a personal note from someone who has been impacted by the donor’s gift.

Recognition programs should be tailored to the needs of the programs being supported, the needs of the donors and the circumstances. The potential for these kinds of recognition programs is limited only by the limits of your creativity.

Speaking of Creativity, your website could be a great place to provide donor recognition. I don’t mean a page with lists of names. I’m thinking of the same kind of articles that’d go in your newsletter … about how a donor’s gift made a difference; a photo of a donor being thanked/congratulated by a highly recognizable, highly regarded person; a photo of a donor being inducted into your “honor society.” Again, the potential is limited only by the limits of your creativity.

Caution is urged for the creation of a permanent, wall-mounted, visual display. Use your wall space judiciously. It’s not infinite.

Typically, wall-mounted recognition is reserved for major gifts for capital campaigns, estate gifts, etc.

Many of the wall-mounted, permanent, recognition modules are impressive and well worth the money. But…. only under the right circumstances.

Using impressive wall-mounted displays for everything detracts from their significance.

When getting advice as to the type of recognition you might want to use for a program, don’t rely on vendors. Their advice must, by its very nature, be self-serving…. Not that they’d be dishonest — just that
there’s a built-in bias.

Many institutions divide their gifts along arbitrary lines for recognition purposes:
$1-$100=Friend; $101-$500=Good Friend; $501-$1,000=Very Good Friend;
$1,001-$5,000=Bosom Buddy; $5,001-$10,000=Blood Brother/Sister; etc.; etc.

The problem with that system is that it assumes every donor wants/needs to see his/her name on a list and/or wants/needs everyone else to see his/her name on a list. Some donors might even object to having their names list ed.

Numerous Additional Resources About Donor Recognition


Fundraising Planning (Tying It All Together)

The Planning Study: (Part #1 of 3 — Almost Always The First Step)

By Hank Lewis

Want to create a Major Gifts Program, a Bequest Program, a Special Event, a Recognition Program, a Capital Campaign ??

The most important information you’d want to have is whether your (prospective) constituents/donors will agree with what you want to do, and what would motivate those folks to want to support and/or participate in your activity.

The best way to get the best answers to those questions would be to ask. And, the best way to ask would be by means of a “Planning Study.”

That the “Study” is for “Planning” purposes suggests that you’ve not committed to taking a particular action and/or to creating a specific kind of program – even though you may have!!

When you ask someone to participate in this kind of “Study,” you are asking for their advice and saying that what you do (or don’t do) will be impacted by what they say (or don’t say).

Unlike the obsolete “feasibility study,” with all its “baggage,” a “Planning Study” asks in-depth questions about a broad range of subjects. Then, based on the study’s findings, an NPO will be able to proceed with programs/activities it knows will be supported by its constituents.

And, by the way, the reason the “Planning Study” is “almost always the first step” is because it is a strong means of cultivating the folks you hope will be your leaders and donors … when you do whatever it is that you’d like to do.

When you ask someone’s advice, they’re more likely to look upon you favorably … because you were smart enough to know to ask them ?

To quote an old fundraising saying: “If you want advice, ask for money; if you want money, ask for advice.” And a “Planning Study” is a great way to ask for advice.

Numerous Additional Resources About Planning Your Fundraising

Also consider
Planning (Basics)


Hiring Fundraisers and Paid Solicitors

Who/What Is A Fundraising Consultant??

By Hank Lewis

In the group of attendees for a recent class in Major Gifts Fundraising was a person identifying herself as a consultant, a member of a fundraising-consulting firm, who was shortly to be working with a client organization in the creation of a major gifts program.

This started me thinking. Who/what is a fundraising/development consultant??

My old dictionary defines a consultant as an expert who is called on for professional or technical advice or opinions.

In this context, I should think there’d be heavy emphasis on the “expert” part of the definition. The problem is that I “hear” many people describing themselves as development consultants that clearly don’t have the education/training and experience it takes to be an expert.

Folks that come from various areas “somewhat related” to development

i.e., marketing, public relations, special events, etc, even those from totally unrelated fields, feel comfortable hanging out their (fundraising) consultant shingle.

At various luncheons, workshops and seminars, I’ve met people who have worked as volunteers and think they now know enough that non-profits should risk their financial futures on them. And I’ve met folks from other fields, and those out of work, who think that “fundraising might be good to try,” and they want to start as consultants.

So, considering the above, I get the feeling that, to protect the non-profit sector from a “bad rap” and consultants (in general) from having a negative label hung on them/us, there needs to be established some set of criteria for who can/should be a fundraising consultant.

It has been suggested that one must have some sort of “credential” to be a fundraising consultant – that the CFRE (as an example) should be required and should be proof enough that the holder is qualified to be a consultant.

Realistically, however, having the CFRE attests only to the fact that the individual has demonstrated knowledge of the basics of fundraising. That’s not the equivalent of “expert“ !!

Like trusting the health of your loved ones to a physician with an on-line degree; there are many practitioners out there in fundraising-consulting-land to whom you’d not want to trust the financial health of your nonprofit organization.

Should You Hire a Fundraiser?

Also consider
Consultants (Hiring)

If So, How Much Should They Be Paid?

If You’re Asked to Be a Fundraiser

Potential Pitfalls with the IRS

You should carefully consider whether you should hire an outside fundraiser, or hire your own employee. The IRS pays increasing attention to the hiring of independent contractors.
Potential Issues in Hiring Consultants (general information and IRS-related issues)


Evaluating Your Fundraising Knowledge and Practices

To conduct a general audit of your fundraising practices, see

Also consider
Evaluations (all kinds)

Related — But Sometimes Not Necessarily Related — Topics
(Social Enterprise, Pro Bono, Sponsorship, Revenue Streams)

Social Enterprise

Gifts of Other Than Money

Cause-Marketing

Corporate Sponsorships

Building Multiple Revenue Sources (Diversifying Revenue Streams)

General Resources

Variety of Information for Beginners

Variety of Information for More Experienced Practitioners


For the Category of Fundraising (Nonprofit):

To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.

Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.